About: Physics Education is an academic journal published by IOP Publishing. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Science education & Computer science. It has an ISSN identifier of 0031-9120. Over the lifetime, 4837 publications have been published receiving 28387 citations.
TL;DR: This article conducted a cross-age study to find out and report the range and nature of school students' understanding of the nature of science and found that students often misinterpret information and experiences presented in the classroom and laboratory.
Abstract: This book should be of interest to all science educators, whether they teach students, advise or inspect or are involved in planning a science curriculum. The content is essentially an account of a research project undertaken to find out and to report the range and nature of school students' understanding of the nature of science. The authors designed a cross-age study, giving the same task to samples of pupils of three different ages: 9, 12 and 16 years. The collected data were analysed to see the ways in which understanding seemed to change with age and experience. The researchers' interest in students' ideas about science has grown from their observation that learners' responses to observations and ideas are constrained and limited in significant ways by their perception of the nature of scientific work and of scientific knowledge. The result is that students often misinterpret information and experiences presented in the classroom and laboratory. The authors hope that, by knowing more about these misperceptions, we may understand better the processes of science content learning and hence achieve more effective teaching. The book is divided into three sections. In the first 70 pages the authors set out the arguments for giving the nature of science a more prominent place in the curriculum. Next they present an overview of the major schools of thought about science and scientific knowledge, followed by a summary of previous research on students' ideas about the nature of science. The section concludes with the questions, methods and tools used in the research. In the next 60 pages the main findings of the study are presented and discussed. In the final chapter the authors bring together the theoretical arguments for the place of teaching about the nature of science with the results of the research study and consider the possible implications for science teaching in schools, discussing ways in which the curriculum could be adapted to assist students to become better citizens in a modern technological world. The book is well laid out, carefully planned and argued at every stage, with excellent clear headings and summaries. It is possible to read it on a superficial level, dwelling more on the conclusions, or to select sections for closer study using either the index or section headings. There are several appendices, one of which contains the 174 references to other publications quoted in the text. There is considerable food for thought and/or discussion or debate, not only for new teachers but as timely reminders to those who have been in the classroom, laboratory or management for many years, about their aims and objectives and whether they are being realized. This is a volume which should find its way into the resource library of every science teaching department.
TL;DR: In this article, a simple and novel method for identifying misconceptions is described, which utilizes the Certainty of Response Index (CRI) in conjunction with answers to multiple choice questions.
Abstract: We describe a simple and novel method for identifying misconceptions. This approach utilizes the Certainty of Response Index (CRI) in conjunction with answers to multiple choice questions.
TL;DR: In this paper, a discussion of the teaching of energy in science education is presented, with the focus on conceptual change in fourth-and fifth-year pupils and their acceptance of (or growth towards) scientific ideas.
Abstract: It is important to recognise that the frameworks here are not meant to categorise youngsters in the way they think. They are a useful means of analysing and describing the complex responses they provide as they discuss the concept of energy. Viennot's (1979) work has shown that formal teaching is not always successful at changing students' ideas. In her study, Engel (1982) found a confusing picture of conceptual change in fourth-and fifth-year pupils - certainly no clear-cut pattern of acceptance of (or growth towards) scientific ideas because of classroom teaching. The debate about the teaching of energy is not a new one, as the letters columns of the long established journals testify. Certainly if youngsters are to be encouraged to undergo conceptual change towards the scientific view, then both the content and practice of science education must change. Conceptual change, one might say, is two way. Pupils' ideas must be valued and built on. Interesting examples are Solomon's (1982) development of `useless' energy, Schmid's (1982) `energy carriers' and Hartel's (1982) circuitry. The frameworks described here are not the full range of possible ones. Rather than simply speculate at quite what students understand by it all, we have to begin to find out. Then both student and teacher can come to know both their own - and each other's - meanings for energy.
TL;DR: In this paper, a method of measuring the volume of small objects based on Archimedes' principle is described, which involves suspending an object in a water-filled container placed on electronic scales.
Abstract: A little-known method of measuring the volume of small objects based on Archimedes' principle is described, which involves suspending an object in a water-filled container placed on electronic scales. The suspension technique is a variation on the hydrostatic weighing technique used for measuring volume. The suspension method was compared with two other traditional water displacement methods of measuring volume, i.e. placing an object in a measuring cylinder and recording the rise in the water level and immersing the object in a water-filled container with an overflow spout to record the volume of overflow. The accuracy and precision of the three methods was compared using ten accurately machined PVC cylinders ranging in volume from 1.5 to 15.7 ml. The mean difference between the actual and measured volumes was 3.3 ± 7.3%, -1.6 ± 7.2% and 0.03 ± 0.45%, for the level, overflow and suspension methods respectively. Each measurement was repeated twice to obtain the reproducibility of the three displacement techniques. The reproducibility was -1.7 ± 8.5%, 0.09 ± 3% and -0.04 ± 0.43% for the level, overflow and suspension techniques respectively. The results show that the suspension technique is more accurate and precise than the traditional water displacement methods and is more accurate than measuring volume using Vernier calliper measurements.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the contribution that one area of informal learning - hands-on, interactive centres -can make to science education and show that interactive centres can make a significant contribution in science education.
Abstract: This article examines the contribution that one area of informal learning - hands-on, interactive centres - can make to science education.