About: Perspectives on Work is an academic journal. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Industrial relations & Social movement. It has an ISSN identifier of 1534-9276. Over the lifetime, 5 publications have been published receiving 47 citations.
TL;DR: The authors argue that changes in Italy's political environment, specifically the demise of the old party system and various strate gic changes by the Italian unions themselves brought about this reversal of fortune; it promises to be much more stable than previous efforts at recasting Italian labor relations.
Abstract: ing political power, membership loss, and significant interand intraunion con flicts, Italy's three major union confeder ations the Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (CGIL), the Confed erazione Italiana dei Sindacati Lavora tori (CISL), and the Unione Italiana dei Lavoratori (UIL), have reemerged as key actors in Italy's political economy How did this turnaround occur and how sta ble is the new position of Italian labor? We argue that changes in Italy's political environment, specifically the demise of the old party system and various strate gic changes by the Italian unions them selves brought about this reversal of fortune; it promises to be much more stable than previous efforts at recasting Italian labor relations
TL;DR: Diversity affinity groups can be defined as groups of employees within an organization who share a common identity, defined by race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or shared extra-organizational values or interests as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Diversity affinity groups can be defined as groups of employees within an organization who share a common identity, defined by race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or shared extra-organizational values or interests. Such groups may be more or less formally organized, and their relationship with management may vary from being adversarial to being cooperative or even fully co-opted by management. They operate outside the jurisdiction of collective bargaining laws. In some ways, it is nothing new to find workers banding together on the basis of their shared ethnicity, gender, religion or other commonalities. In the nineteenth century, craft unions were regularly organized according to ethnic and religious affiliations, and in the twentieth century, industrial unions like the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters were organized along lines of social identity as well. But in the early 1970s, diversity affinity groups first started cropping up in large companies--the most well known being the pioneering Black Caucus at Xerox Corporation. Unlike their predecessors in the labor movement, the members of these groups are generally white collar. And, of course, they are not formally recognized--in law or in practice--as legal representatives of workers' interests. For these reasons, some dismiss these groups as mere window dressing--a distraction from stronger forms of worker voice, or, worse, employer dominated vehicles of worker co-optation. Yet, others have come to see them as an important part of the fabric of America's ever-evolving system of industrial relations (...).