Scispace (Formerly Typeset)
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Language Testing
  4. 2020
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Language Testing
  4. 2020
Showing papers in "Language Testing in 2020"
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219898380•
Predicting L2 reading proficiency with modalities of vocabulary knowledge: A bootstrapping approach:

[...]

Stuart McLean1, Stuart McLean2, Jeffrey Stewart3, Aaron Olaf Batty•
University of St Andrews1, Osaka Jogakuin College2, Tokyo University of Science3
27 Jan 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: This paper used L2 written receptive vocabulary knowledge as a justification for the assessment of L2 reading proficiency, and found that the relationship between vocabularies and reading proficiency is well-studied.
Abstract: Vocabulary’s relationship to reading proficiency is frequently cited as a justification for the assessment of L2 written receptive vocabulary knowledge. However, to date, there has been relatively ...

109 citations

Journal Article•10.1177/0265532220943483•
Test review: Current options in at-home language proficiency tests for making high-stakes decisions

[...]

Daniel R. Isbell1, Benjamin Kremmel2•
University of Hawaii1, University of Innsbruck2
16 Jul 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: In 2019, the administration of high-stakes language proficiency tests has been disrupted in many parts of the world as a result of the 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: Administration of high-stakes language proficiency tests has been disrupted in many parts of the world as a result of the 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic. Institutions that rely on test scores have...

62 citations

Journal Article•10.1177/0265532220911626•
Effect of prompt type on test-takers’ writing performance and writing strategy use in the continuation task:

[...]

Bibing Shi, Liyan Huang1, Xiaofei Lu2•
South China Normal University1, Pennsylvania State University2
18 Mar 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: The continuation task as discussed by the authors ) is a reading-writing integrated task in which test-takers read an incomplete story and then write the continuation and ending of the story, has been increasingly use.
Abstract: The continuation task, a new form of reading-writing integrated task in which test-takers read an incomplete story and then write the continuation and ending of the story, has been increasingly use...

54 citations

Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219879044•
Developing tools for learning oriented assessment of interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice:

[...]

Lyn May1, Fumiyo Nakatsuhara2, Daniel M. K. Lam2, Evelina D. Galaczi3•
Queensland University of Technology1, University of Bedfordshire2, University of Cambridge3
01 Apr 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors report on a project in which they developed tools to support the classroom assessment of learners' interactional competence (IC) and provided learning oriented feedback in the contex...
Abstract: In this paper we report on a project in which we developed tools to support the classroom assessment of learners’ interactional competence (IC) and provided learning oriented feedback in the contex...

48 citations

Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219871470•
Is anybody listening?:The nature of second language listening in integrated listening-to-summarize tasks

[...]

Anchana Rukthong1, Tineke Brunfaut2•
Prince of Songkla University1, Lancaster University2
01 Nov 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: This article used integrated test tasks, such as listening-to-speak or reading-towrite, to assess second language assessment, despite relatively limited empirical insights into what they assess, and found that most of the test tasks were ineffective.
Abstract: Integrated test tasks, such as listening-to-speak or reading-to-write, are increasingly used in second language assessment despite relatively limited empirical insights into what they assess. Most ...

43 citations

Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219860077•
Managing proposal sequences in role-play assessment: Validity evidence of interactional competence across levels:

[...]

Soo Jung Youn1•
Northern Arizona University1
01 Jan 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the nature of interactional competence at various levels of achievement in the context of role-play speaking assessment, and report an investigation of the qualitative study of the interactions among participants.
Abstract: This qualitative study reports an investigation of the nature of interactional competence at various levels of achievement in the context of role-play speaking assessment. The focal point of this s...

43 citations

Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219888617•
Clozing the gap: How far do cloze items measure?:

[...]

Jonathan Trace
01 Apr 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: The cloze test was originally designed to measure reading and passage comprehension in L1 readers, and it has been used for L2 assessment purposes as discussed by the authors.However, there remain disputes about whether or not cloze tests should be used in L2 readers.
Abstract: Originally designed to measure reading and passage comprehension in L1 readers, cloze tests continue to be used for L2 assessment purposes. However, there remain disputes about whether or not cloze...

29 citations

Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219859881•
Examining the assessment literacy required for interpreting score reports: A focus on educators of K–12 English learners:

[...]

Ahyoung Alicia Kim1, Mark Chapman1, Akira Kondo1, Carsten Wilmes1•
University of Wisconsin-Madison1
01 Jan 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: This article investigated the assessment literacy required for K-12 educators to interpret score reports from a K -12 English language proficiency assessment and found that the assessment in concern is ACCESS for E...
Abstract: This study investigated the assessment literacy required for K–12 educators to interpret score reports from a K–12 English language proficiency assessment. The assessment in concern is ACCESS for E...

27 citations

Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219893384•
Mapping the fluctuating effect of strategy use ability on English reading performance for nursing students: A multi-layered moderation analysis approach:

[...]

Yuyang Cai1, Antony John Kunnan2•
Shanghai University of International Business and Economics1, University of Macau2
01 Apr 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: In this paper, an essential hypothesis of modern language assessment theory pertains to the interaction between strategy use ability (strategic competence) and second language knowledge, and how they interac...
Abstract: An essential hypothesis of modern language assessment theory pertains to the interaction between strategy use ability (strategic competence) and second language knowledge. However, how they interac...

26 citations

Journal Article•10.1177/0265532220927407•
Drawing on repeat test takers to study test preparation practices and their links to score gains

[...]

Ute Knoch1, Annemiek Huisman1, Cathie Elder1, Xiaoxiao Kong1, Angela McKenna1 •
University of Melbourne1
18 Jun 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: A key concern of washback research in language testing is with the value of test preparation for facilitating learning and improving test performance Although test takers may draw on a wide range as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: A key concern of washback research in language testing is with the value of test preparation for facilitating learning and improving test performance Although test takers may draw on a wide range

20 citations

Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219862265•
Pseudowords and guessing in the Yes/No format vocabulary test:

[...]

Xian Zhang1, Jianda Liu2, Haiyang Ai3•
University of North Texas1, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies2, University of Cincinnati3
01 Jan 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: This paper investigated guessing in the YN format vocabulary test and found that one hundred-and-five university students took a YN test, a translation task and a multiple-choic...
Abstract: The main purpose of this study is to investigate guessing in the Yes/No (YN) format vocabulary test. One-hundred-and-five university students took a YN test, a translation task and a multiple-choic...
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219861042•
What does the analysis of C-test gaps tell us about the construct of a C-test? A comparison of foreign and heritage language learners’ performance:

[...]

Anastasia Drackert1, Anna Timukova1•
Ruhr University Bochum1
01 Jan 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: The authors investigates whether the aspects of language proficiency of C-tests can accurately measure general language proficiency, in view of the ubiquitous increase in the use of c-tests, which are almost unanimously believed to measure general English proficiency.
Abstract: In view of the ubiquitous increase in the use of C-tests, which are almost unanimously believed to measure general language proficiency, this study investigates whether the aspects of language prof...
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219898635•
A comparison of holistic, analytic, and part marking models in speaking assessment:

[...]

Nahal Khabbazbashi1, Evelina D. Galaczi2•
University of Bedfordshire1, University of Cambridge2
24 Jan 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: The authors examined holistic, analytic, and part marking models in terms of their measurement properties and impact on candidate CEFR classifications in a semi-direct online semi-supervised setting.
Abstract: This mixed methods study examined holistic, analytic, and part marking models (MMs) in terms of their measurement properties and impact on candidate CEFR classifications in a semi-direct online spe...
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219876226•
Fitting MD analysis in an argument-based validity framework for writing assessment: Explanation and generalization inferences for the ECPE

[...]

Xun Yan1, Shelley Staples2•
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign1, University of Arizona2
01 Apr 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: The argument-based approach to validity (Kane, 2013) focuses on two steps: (1) making claims about the proposed interpretation and use of test scores as a coherent, interpretive argument; (2) e...
Abstract: The argument-based approach to validity (Kane, 2013) focuses on two steps: (1) making claims about the proposed interpretation and use of test scores as a coherent, interpretive argument; and (2) e...
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532220927756•
Book review: Handbook of Diagnostic Classification Models: Models and Model Extensions, Applications, Software Packages:

[...]

Tingting Fan1•
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics1
05 Jun 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: Geranpayeh, A., and Taylor, L. as discussed by the authors (2013). Examining listening: Research and practice in assessing second language listening listening, vol. 30. UCLES/Cambridge University Press.
Abstract: Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press. Geranpayeh, A., & Taylor, L. (Eds.). (2013). Examining listening: Research and practice in assessing second language listening. Studies in Language Testing, vol. 30. UCLES/Cambridge University Press. Khalifa, H., & Weir, C. J. (2009). Examining reading: Research and practice in assessing second language reading. Studies in Language Testing, vol. 29. UCLES/Cambridge University Press. Milanovic, M., & Saville, N. (1996). Considering the impact of Cambridge EFL examinations. UCLES internal report. O’Sullivan, B. (2000). Towards a model of performance in oral language testing (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). University of Reading, UK. Shaw, S., & Weir, C. (2007). Examining writing: Research and practice in assessing second language writing. Studies in Language Testing, vol. 26. UCLES/Cambridge University Press. Taylor, L. (Ed.). (2011). Examining Speaking: Research and practice in assessing second language speaking. Studies in Language Testing, vol. 30. UCLES/Cambridge University Press. Weir, C. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514577
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219876527•
Development and validation of a Chinese character acquisition assessment for second-language kindergarteners:

[...]

Stephanie W. Y. Chan1, WM Cheung1, Yanli Huang1, Wai-Ip Lam1, Chin-Hsi Lin1 •
University of Hong Kong1
01 Apr 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: The authors studied the L2 Chinese education for kindergarteners and found that these kindergarteners' L2 skills were significantly worse than those of their older peers, with existing studies focusing on school-age pop-up children.
Abstract: Demand for second-language (L2) Chinese education for kindergarteners has grown rapidly, but little is known about these kindergarteners’ L2 skills, with existing studies focusing on school-age pop...
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219900228•
Do experience and text quality matter for raters’ decision-making behaviors?:

[...]

Özgür Şahan1, Salim Razi2•
Bursa Technical University1, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University2
27 Jan 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: This article examined the decision-making behaviors of raters with varying levels of experience while assessing EFL essays of distinct qualities and found that the data were collected from 28 raters, with varying level of experience.
Abstract: This study examines the decision-making behaviors of raters with varying levels of experience while assessing EFL essays of distinct qualities. The data were collected from 28 raters with varying l...
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219898382•
Validity evidence for a sentence repetition test of Swiss German Sign Language

[...]

Tobias Haug, Aaron Olaf Batty1, Martin Venetz, Christa Notter, Simone Girard-Groeber, Ute Knoch2, Mireille Audeoud •
Keio University1, University of Melbourne2
23 Jan 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors seek evidence of validity according to the socio-cognitive framework for a new sentence repetition test (SRT) for young deaf L1 Swiss German Sign Language (DSGS) users.
Abstract: In this study we seek evidence of validity according to the socio-cognitive framework (Weir, 2005) for a new sentence repetition test (SRT) for young Deaf L1 Swiss German Sign Language (DSGS) users...
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219879654•
Evaluating subscore uses across multiple levels: A case of reading and listening subscores for young EFL learners:

[...]

Ikkyu Choi, Spiros Papageorgiou
01 Apr 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: This article argued that reporting a subscore is not always justified, and that the subscore should provide reliable and distinct information to be worth repurchasing, and not just to report a score.
Abstract: Stakeholders of language tests are often interested in subscores. However, reporting a subscore is not always justified; a subscore should provide reliable and distinct information to be worth repo...
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532220927751•
An analysis of TOEFL® Primary™ repeaters: How much score change occurs?:

[...]

Yeonsuk Cho, Ian Blood
17 Jun 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: The authors examined how much change in TOEFL reading and listening scores can be expected in relation to the time interval between test administrations and the test records of 5213 learners. But they did not examine the effect of test administrations on the test scores.
Abstract: In this study, we examined how much change in TOEFL® Primary™ listening and reading scores can be expected in relation to the time interval between test administrations. The test records of 5213 yo...
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532220909310•
An innovative measure of orthographic processing: Development and initial validation:

[...]

Yi-Jui Iva Chen1, Yi-Jui Iva Chen2, Mark Wilson, Robin C. Irey2, Mary K. Requa2, Mary K. Requa3 •
University of South Florida1, University of California, Berkeley2, San Francisco State University3
01 Mar 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: Orthographic processing is essential when learning to recognize words as discussed by the authors, the ability to perceive, access, differentiate, and manipulate orthographic knowledge is essential for learning to recognise words.
Abstract: Orthographic processing – the ability to perceive, access, differentiate, and manipulate orthographic knowledge – is essential when learning to recognize words. Despite its critical importance in l...
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532220930348•
Change in home language environment and English literacy achievement over time: A multi-group latent growth curve modeling investigation:

[...]

Hyunah Kim1, Christine Barron1, Jeanne Sinclair2, Eunice Eunhee Jang1•
University of Toronto1, University of the Incarnate Word2
30 Jun 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: In most studies investigating the educational outcomes of linguistically diverse students, variables that identify this population have been considered as static variables as mentioned in this paper, owing to the dynamic nomenclature of this population.
Abstract: In most studies investigating the educational outcomes of linguistically diverse students, variables that identify this population have been considered as static. In reality, owing to the dynamic n...
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532220928533•
An introduction to Language Testing’s first Virtual Special Issue: Investigating consequences of language test use:

[...]

Carol A. Chapelle1•
Iowa State University1
12 Jun 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: The Virtual Special Issues as mentioned in this paper is a new resource for language testing readers that will highlight important topics and trends in the field by curating previously published articles and articles about language testing.
Abstract: Virtual Special Issues are a new resource for Language Testing readers. The Virtual Special Issues will highlight important topics and trends in the field by curating previously published articles ...
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532220934203•
A Bayesian approach to improving measurement precision over multiple test occasions

[...]

Alistair Van Moere, Sean Hanlon
25 Jun 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: In language assessment and in educational measurement more broadly, there is a tendency to interpret scores from single-administration tests as accurate indicators of a latent trait (e.g., reading) as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: In language assessment and in educational measurement more broadly, there is a tendency to interpret scores from single-administration tests as accurate indicators of a latent trait (e.g., reading ...
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532220934202•
Repeated test-taking and longitudinal test score analysis:

[...]

Anthony Green1, Alistair Van Moere•
University of Bedfordshire1
23 Oct 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: This paper studied the effect of repeated test-taking in Chinese civil service examinations and found that the value of their cumulative investment in learning, as expressed by their test scores, may fall as well as rise over time.
Abstract: This Special Issue of Language Testing is devoted to research into repeated test taking and associated issues. Although repeated test taking is beginning to attract increased research attention, it is far from a new phenomenon. According to Elman (2000), most of those entering for the highly competitive civil service examinations in Qing era China repeatedly entered and repeatedly failed: “For most, persistence . . . was a way of life” (p. 147). It was also regarded as a sign of strength of character and rectitude. Zhang Jian, winner of first place in the palace examinations (the highest level of the system) in 1894, was celebrated as the embodiment of resoluteness. His eventual triumph only came after almost 20 years of repeated failure. Although examination success may represent the culmination of many years of study, many repeating candidates have been frustrated to find that the value of their cumulative investment in learning, as expressed by their test scores, may fall as well as rise over time. In his classic paper on the statistics of examinations, Edgeworth (1888) observed that “It is said to be a frequent occurrence at some of our civil service examinations that a candidate, when examined for the second time, after a year’s hopeful study of a subject, obtains fewer marks in it than he had obtained at the first examination” (p. 606). Edgeworth understood this element of luck in examination results as a problem of measurement error, attributable to a wide range of factors. He also saw that taking multiple tests would reduce the relative impact of error:
Journal Article•10.25384/SAGE.C.5043396.V1•
Understanding writing quality change: A longitudinal study of repeaters of a high-stakes standardized English proficiency test:

[...]

You-Min Lin, Michelle Y. Chen
28 Jun 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: This paper examined the writing score and writing feature changes of 562 repeat test takers who took the Canadian English Language Proficiency Index Program-General (CELPIP-General) test at least twice.
Abstract: This study examined the writing score and writing feature changes of 562 repeat test takers who took the Canadian English Language Proficiency Index Program–General (CELPIP–General) test at least t...
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219901105•
Book review: Examining Young Learners: Research and Practice in Assessing the English of School-age Learners:

[...]

Xiangdong Gu1, Yuhong Lin1•
Chongqing University1
24 Jan 2020-Language Testing
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532220924013•
K. Zechner and K. Evanini (Eds.), Automated Speaking Assessment: Using Language Technologies to Score Spontaneous Speech:

[...]

J. Dylan Burton1•
Michigan State University1
23 May 2020-Language Testing
TL;DR: This resourceful and insightful book provides an intact and thorough historical narrative of key issues at the heart of the social consequences of testing for language-minoritized bilinguals in the United States, and it serves as an important starting point for language testing scholars’ reflections on their roles in the field with respect to testtaskers’ perspectives and experiences.
Abstract: thorough foray into the history of discrimination based on testing in the United States is commendable and the deep analysis of negative testing consequences for various communities is absolutely imperative, the scope of the book is wide and its history long. This speaks again to the book’s general accessibility and its range in terms of various audiences, each concerned with language testing in myriad ways and to various degrees. These quibbles aside, Schissel achieves what she sets out to do in this resourceful and insightful book. It provides an intact and thorough historical narrative of key issues at the heart of the social consequences of testing for language-minoritized bilinguals in the United States, and it serves as an important starting point for language testing scholars’ reflections on their roles in the field with respect to testtaskers’ perspectives and experiences.
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532220925422•
R. J. Mislevy, Sociocognitive Foundations of Educational Measurement:

[...]

Eunice Eunhee Jang
13 May 2020-Language Testing
Journal Article•10.1177/0265532219892879•
Book Review: Assessing L2 Listening: Moving Towards Authenticity

[...]

Franz Holzknecht1•
University of Innsbruck1
01 Apr 2020-Language Testing

Tools

SciSpace AgentBiomedical AgentSciSpace RecruitSciSpace for EnterpriseAgent GalleryChat with PDFLiterature ReviewAI WriterFind TopicsParaphraserCitation GeneratorExtract DataAI DetectorCitation Booster

Learn

ResourcesLive Workshops

SciSpace

CareersSupportBrowse PapersPricingSciSpace Affiliate ProgramCancellation & Refund PolicyTermsPrivacyData Sources

Directories

PapersTopicsJournalsAuthorsConferencesInstitutionsCitation StylesWriting templates

Extension & Apps

SciSpace Chrome ExtensionSciSpace Mobile App

Contact

support@scispace.com
SciSpace

© 2026 | PubGenius Inc. | Suite # 217 691 S Milpitas Blvd Milpitas CA 95035, USA

soc2
Secured by Delve