Scispace (Formerly Typeset)
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Journal of Fluency Disorders
  4. 2006
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Journal of Fluency Disorders
  4. 2006
Showing papers in "Journal of Fluency Disorders in 2006"
Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2006.02.002•
Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering (OASES): Documenting multiple outcomes in stuttering treatment

[...]

J. Scott Yaruss1, Robert W. Quesal2•
University of Pittsburgh1, Western Illinois University2
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: This paper summarizes scale development, reliability and validity assessment, and scoring procedures so clinicians and researchers can use the OASES to add to the available evidence about the outcomes of a variety of treatment approaches for adults who stutter.

521 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2006.04.001•
Altered Auditory Feedback and the Treatment of Stuttering: A Review

[...]

Michelle Lincoln1, Ann Packman1, Mark Onslow1•
University of Sydney1
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: There is no reason to accept a recent suggestion that AAF devices would be a defensible clinical option for children, and critical knowledge about the effect of AAF during conversational speech and in everyday speaking situations is missing.

136 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2005.11.005•
Phonological encoding in the silent speech of persons who stutter.

[...]

Jayanthi Sasisekaran1, Luc De Nil1, Ron Smyth1, Carla J. Johnson1•
University of Toronto1
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: Results indicated that PWS were significantly slower in phoneme monitoring compared to PNS, which was interpreted to suggest a specific deficiency at the level of phonological monitoring, rather than a general monitoring, reaction time or auditory monitoring deficit in PWS.

92 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2006.05.003•
Effects of stuttering severity and therapy involvement on attitudes towards people who stutter

[...]

Rodney Gabel1•
Bowling Green State University1
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: Findings of this study support past research studies that has found that individuals who stutter mildly are perceived more positively than those who are severe and that PWS that attend therapy are perceivedMore positively than Those who do not attend therapy.

68 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2006.08.001•
Phoneme monitoring in silent naming and perception in adults who stutter.

[...]

Jayanthi Sasisekaran1, Luc De Nil1•
University of Toronto1
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: It is suggested that PWS were slower in the encoding of segmental, phonological units during silent naming, and absence of such differences in perception ruled out a general monitoring deficit in PWS.

62 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2006.08.003•
Frequency of stuttering during challenging and supportive virtual reality job interviews

[...]

Shelley B. Brundage1, Ken Graap, Kathleen F. Gibbons1, Mirtha Ferrer, Jeremy Brooks •
George Washington University1
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: This paper developed a VR job interview environment which allowed experimental control over communication style and gender of interviewers, and indicated that interviewer communication style affected the amount of stuttering produced by participants, with more stuttering observed during challenging virtual interviews.

61 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2006.05.002•
A qualitative study of how African American men who stutter attribute meaning to identity and life choices.

[...]

Derek E. Daniels1, Fran Hagstrom2, Rodney Gabel1•
Bowling Green State University1, University of Arkansas2
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: Results indicated that the interaction of communication, ethnicity, and culture affected how the participants perceived themselves, their stuttering, and their life choices.

59 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2006.06.001•
A cross-cultural, long-term outcome evaluation of the ISTAR Comprehensive Stuttering Program across Dutch and Canadian adults who stutter.

[...]

Marilyn Langevin1, Wendy J. Huinck2, Deborah Kully1, Herman F.M. Peters2, Holly Lomheim1, Marian Tellers •
University of Alberta1, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre2
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: Overall, results suggest that, the CSP appears to be similarly effective in both cultures and thus, sufficiently sensitive to the culture of Dutch adults who stutter.

53 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2006.04.004•
The effect of SpeechEasy on stuttering frequency in laboratory conditions.

[...]

Joy Armson1, Michael Kiefte1, Jessica Mason1, Dayani De Croos1•
Dalhousie University1
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: Although stuttering reduced in the SpeechEasy device compared to the baseline conditions during at least one of three speech tasks for most participants, degree and pattern of benefit varied greatly across participants.

51 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2006.07.002•
Comparing judgments of stuttering made by students, clinicians, and highly experienced judges

[...]

Shelley B. Brundage1, Anne K. Bothe2, Amy N. Lengeling, Jeffrey J. Evans3•
George Washington University1, University of Georgia2, Pearson Education3
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: These results replicate previous findings of high agreement coexisting with low accuracy in students' judgments of stuttering, extending those findings to show that similar problems are evident in judgments made by practicing clinicians.

40 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2005.12.001•
The relationship between pre-treatment clinical profile and treatment outcome in an integrated stuttering program.

[...]

Wendy J. Huinck1, Marilyn Langevin2, Deborah Kully2, Kees Graamans1, Herman F.M. Peters1, Wouter Hulstijn3 •
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre1, University of Alberta2, Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information3
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: The findings show that, based on treatment gains, specific subgroups can be identified, each requiring different treatment approaches and underlines the necessity of developing a better understanding of how various dimensions of stuttering relate to treatment outcome.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2006.01.003•
Transcending Stuttering: The Inside Story

[...]

Jim Tsiamtsiouris1•
City University of New York1
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2005.12.002•
A response to Bernstein Ratner (2005)

[...]

Joseph S. Attanasio1•
Montclair State University1
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: In this article, the authors clarify statements made by Bernstein Ratner in her article, "Evidence-based practice in stuttering: Some questions to consider" (JFD, 2005).
Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2006.04.002•
Disfluency data of German preschool children who stutter and comparison children.

[...]

Ulrich Natke1, Patricia Sandrieser1, Reinhard Pietrowsky1, Karl Theodor Kalveram1•
University of Düsseldorf1
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: How German-speaking preschool children who stutter and who do not stutter display stuttering-like and normal disfluencies including number of iterations is described and how powerful classification measures for the diagnosis of stuttering are explained is explained.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2006.05.001•
Nonword repetition skills in young children who do and do not stutter.

[...]

Julie D. Anderson1, Stacy A. Wagovich2, Nancy E. Hall3•
Indiana University1, University of Missouri2, University of Maine3
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: Findings lend support to previous work, suggesting that nonword repetition skills differ for CWS compared with CWNS, and that these findings cannot be attributed to (a) weak language performance on the part of CWS, or (b) the occurrence of stuttering in the course of nonword production.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2005.11.004•
The transition to increased automaticity during finger sequence learning in adult males who stutter.

[...]

Sarah Smits-Bandstra1, Luc F. De Nil1, Luc F. De Nil2, Elizabeth Rochon1, Elizabeth Rochon3 •
University of Toronto1, University Health Network2, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute3
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: Results suggested that control subjects transitioned to quick, accurate and increasingly automatic performance on the sequencing task after practice, while PWS did not, which may have important clinical implications for stuttering treatment effectiveness.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2006.04.003•
Speech and nonspeech sequence skill learning in adults who stutter.

[...]

Sarah Smits-Bandstra1, Luc F. De Nil1, Luc F. De Nil2, Jean A. Saint-Cyr2, Jean A. Saint-Cyr1 •
University of Toronto1, University Health Network2
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: Results partially supported the inference that PWS demonstrated differences in early stages of sequence skill learning compared to PNS, and summarized the reviewed literature concerning the performance of PWS on speech and nonspeech sequencing tasks over practice.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2006.07.001•
Auditory abilities of speakers who persisted, or recovered, from stuttering

[...]

Peter Howell1, Stephen Davis1, Sheila M. Williams1•
University College London1
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: Backward masking performance at teenage is one factor that distinguishes speakers who persist in their stutter from those who recover, and hearing disorders have been implicated in other language disorders.
Journal Article•10.1016/J.JFLUDIS.2006.08.002•
Effects of perceptual and conceptual similarity in lexical priming of young children who stutter: Preliminary findings

[...]

Kia N. Hartfield1, Edward G. Conture1•
Vanderbilt University1
01 Jan 2006-Journal of Fluency Disorders
TL;DR: Findings were taken to suggest that CWS tend to organize lexical information functionally more so than physically and that this tendency may relate to difficulties establishing normally fluent speech and language.

Tools

SciSpace AgentBiomedical AgentSciSpace RecruitSciSpace for EnterpriseAgent GalleryChat with PDFLiterature ReviewAI WriterFind TopicsParaphraserCitation GeneratorExtract DataAI DetectorCitation Booster

Learn

ResourcesLive Workshops

SciSpace

CareersSupportBrowse PapersPricingSciSpace Affiliate ProgramCancellation & Refund PolicyTermsPrivacyData Sources

Directories

PapersTopicsJournalsAuthorsConferencesInstitutionsCitation StylesWriting templates

Extension & Apps

SciSpace Chrome ExtensionSciSpace Mobile App

Contact

support@scispace.com
SciSpace

© 2026 | PubGenius Inc. | Suite # 217 691 S Milpitas Blvd Milpitas CA 95035, USA

soc2
Secured by Delve