About: International Journal of Reliability and Safety is an academic journal published by Inderscience Publishers. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Computer science & Reliability (statistics). It has an ISSN identifier of 1479-389X. Over the lifetime, 252 publications have been published receiving 2008 citations. The journal is also known as: IJRS.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors define the validation measure between prediction and data as the shortest possible distance given the imprecision about the distributions and their dependencies, and define the unification between these two concepts.
Abstract: Validation is the assessment of the match between a model's predictions and empirical observations. It can be complex when either data or the prediction is characterised as an uncertain number (i.e. interval, probability distribution, p-box, or more general structure). Validation could measure the discrepancy between the shapes of the two uncertain numbers representing prediction and data, or it could characterise the differences between realisations drawn from the respective uncertain numbers. The unification between these two concepts relies on defining the validation measure between prediction and data as the shortest possible distance given the imprecision about the distributions and their dependencies.
TL;DR: The proposed algorithm is able to solve the risk-energy constrained REQPP for the continuity of communication and fulfills the needs of multi-constrained path whereas its time-complexity is of the order of Dijkstra's algorithm.
Abstract: In this paper, a new variant of the Quickest Path Problem (QPP) is addressed with additional factors of risk and energy which leads to the evaluation of Risk-Energy Constrained Quickest Path Proble...
TL;DR: In this paper, a survey of inverse reliability measures and their advantages compared with the direct measures of safety such as probability of failure and reliability index is presented. But the authors focus on different advantages of inverse measures, such as improved computational efficiency of Reliability-Based Design Optimisation (RBDO), accuracy in Response Surface Approximation (RSAs), and easy estimates of resources needed for achieving target safety levels.
Abstract: Several inverse reliability measures (e.g. Probabilistic Performance Measure (PPM) and Probabilistic Sufficiency Factor (PSF)) that are essentially equivalent have been introduced in recent years as measures of safety. The different names for essentially the same measure reflect the fact that different researchers focused on different advantages of inverse measures. These advantages include improved computational efficiency of Reliability-Based Design Optimisation (RBDO), accuracy in Response Surface Approximations (RSAs) and easy estimates of resources needed for achieving target safety levels. This paper surveys these inverse measures and describes their advantages compared with the direct measures of safety such as probability of failure and reliability index. Methods to compute the inverse measures are also described. RBDO with inverse measure is demonstrated with a beam design example.
TL;DR: A new form of imprecise probabilities for reliability assessment based on generalised intervals is presented and a logic coherence constraint is proposed in the new form.
Abstract: Different representations of imprecise probabilities have been proposed, where interval-valued probabilities are used such that uncertainty is distinguished from variability. In this paper, we present a new form of imprecise probabilities for reliability assessment based on generalised intervals. Generalised intervals have group properties under the Kaucher arithmetic, which provides a concise representation and calculus structure as an extension of precise probabilities. With the separation between proper and improper interval probabilities, focal and non-focal events are differentiated based on the associated modalities and logical semantics. Focal events have the semantics of critical, uncontrollable, and specified in probabilistic analysis, whereas the corresponding non-focal events are complementary, controllable, and derived. A logic coherence constraint is proposed in the new form. Because of the algebraic properties of generalised intervals, conditional interval probability can be directly defined based on marginal interval probabilities. A Bayes' rule with generalised intervals allows us to interpret the logic relationship between interval prior and posterior probabilities. The imprecise Dirichlet model is also extended with the logic coherence constraint.
TL;DR: In this paper, the reliability evaluation of complex multidisciplinary engineering systems with feedback coupling is considered, and two algorithms are developed to evaluate the reliability of such systems with a traditional 'black box' or fully coupled approach.
Abstract: This paper develops two algorithms that address the reliability evaluation of complex multidisciplinary engineering systems. In particular, systems with feedback coupling - a common characteristic of many multidisciplinary analyses - are considered. In such analyses, iterative convergence loops are needed to resolve inconsistencies in feedback variables. Assessing the reliability of such systems with a traditional 'black box' or fully coupled approach requires Multidisciplinary Analysis (MDA) convergence loops nested inside iterative loops for probabilistic analysis. The resulting computational effort is unacceptable for most high fidelity analyses. Therefore, this paper proposes two first-order reliability analysis methods that efficiently apply probabilistic analysis to multidisciplinary systems with feedback using a decoupling approach. The first method uses a First-Order Second Moment (FOSM) technique to characterise intermediate variables while applying more rigorous reliability analysis on the system as a whole. The second algorithm gives a specific solution to a decoupled first-order reliability analysis formulation as an optimisation problem. Each method is applied to an illustrative mathematical model and compared to otherwise equivalent coupled approaches with respect to accuracy and computational effort.