TL;DR: In this article, the boundary value problems with a spectral parameter in equations and boundary conditions were studied in connection with specific physical processes, and the completeness and the basis property of eigenfunctions of such problems were investigated.
Abstract: Problems with a spectral parameter in equations and boundary conditions form an important part of spectral theory of linear differential operators. A bibliography of papers in which such problems were considered in connection with specific physical processes can be found in [1, 2]. Boundary value problems for ordinary differential operators with a spectral parameter in boundary conditions were considered in various settings in numerous papers [3–14]. The completeness and the basis property of eigenfunctions of boundary value problems with a spectral parameter in equations and boundary conditions were studied in more detail in [7, 8]. Consider the following boundary value problem for the Dirac system with the same spectral parameter in the equations and the boundary conditions:
TL;DR: In this paper, simple explicit solutions of the form (1) of the wave equation with three space variables x1, x2, and x3 were given. But they were not given for the case where the phase θ and the distortion factor g are given functions of the space variables and time and the function f(θ) describing the wave shape.
Abstract: of hyperbolic equations, where the phase θ and the distortion factor g are given functions of the space variables and time and the function f(θ) describing the wave shape is arbitrary. The examples of the plane wave with θ = x1−ct and g = 1 and the spherical wave with θ = |x|−ct and g = |x|−1, where |x| = (x1 + x2 + x3) , were given in [1] for the wave equation with three space variables x1, x2, and x3. We are interested in simple explicit solutions of the form (1) of the wave equation
TL;DR: In this article, the authors prove the existence of strong solutions of the problem under the assumption that there exists an upper solution u and a lower solution u almost everywhere on (x;t)2 QT.
Abstract: where T =( S[0;T))[f(x; 0)j x2 g is the parabolic boundary of the cylinderQT , the function g : QT R! R equals the dierence between compositionally measurable functions g2(x;t;u )a nd g1(x;t;u) nondecreasing with respect to u. The continuity of g(x;t;u) with respect to the phase variable u is not assumed. A strong solution of problem (1), (2) is dened as a function u2 W 2;1 1 (QT ) with the zero trace on T which satises Eq. (1) for almost all (x;t)2 QT . An upper (lower) solution of problem (1), (2) is dened as a function u (u )f romW 2;1 1 (QT )w ith a nonnegative (nonpositive) trace on T which satises the inequality Lu(x;t )+ g1 (x;t; u(x;t) ) g2 (x;t; u(x;t)) [respectively, Lu(x;t )+ g1 (x;t;u(x;t)+) g2 (x;t;u(x;t))] almost everywhere on QT . Using the abstract scheme of the method of upper and lower solutions [2], they prove propositions about the existence of strong solutions of problem (1), (2) under the assumption that there exist an upper solution u and a lower solution u of this problem; moreover, u u almost everywhere on QT . In this case, we require that the A1-condition be satised for Eq. (1), namely, there exists a no-more-than countable setfSi ;i 2 Ig of surfaces Si = (x;t;u)2 R n+2 j u = ’i(x;t); (x;t)2 QT ;’ i2 W 2;1 loc;1 (QT );
TL;DR: In this article, a real integrable function q(x) on arbitrary n = 1, 2, 3,..., and m = 0, 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 38
Abstract: were constructed in [1] for a real integrable function q(x) on [0, `] and for arbitrary n = 1, 2, 3, . . . and m = 0, 1, 2, . . . Here λn is the nth eigenvalue, sn ≡ √ λn, yn(x) is the nth normalized eigenfunction, and λn,m(q), sn,m(q), and yn,m(q, x) are quantities that can be constructed explicitly via the function q(x). In particular, the λn,0 ≡ (nπ/`) are the eigenvalues of the degenerate problem, the yn,0(x) ≡ √ 2/` sin(nπx/`)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors considered the Verigin-problem with strongly (L, p)-sectorial operator M and showed that P+P = PP+ = P+ and Q+Q = QQ+ = Q+, where Q− = Q−Q+, choose T ∈ R+ and P−u(0) = u0, P+u(T ) = uT (2)
Abstract: P+ ∈ L (U), Q+ ∈ L (F), where Γ+ ⊂ C is a closed contour lying in the right half-plane and bounding a domain containing the set σ +(M) = {μ ∈ σ(M) : Reμ > 0}, R μ(M) = (μL−M)−1L, Lμ(M) = L(μL−M)−1. Let the operator M be strongly (L, p)-sectorial [2]. Then there exist projections P ∈ L (U) and Q ∈ L (F); moreover, P+P = PP+ = P+ and Q+Q = QQ+ = Q+. We set P− = P − P+ and Q− = Q−Q+, choose T ∈ R+, and consider Verigin’s problem P−u(0) = u0, P+u(T ) = uT (2)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proved existence theorems for the common Lyapunov function of a family of asymptotically stable dynamical systems, which they called as stable systems.
Abstract: The paper proves existence theorems for the common Lyapunov function of a family of asymptotically stable dynamical systems. The theorems generalize and develop the results announced in [1].