About: Chaplaincy Today is an academic journal. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Pastoral care & Health care. Over the lifetime, 130 publications have been published receiving 591 citations.
TL;DR: This paper focused on seven categories of self-report response bias that may impact chaplaincy research: social desirability, acquiescence, leniency or harshness, critical event or recency, halo effect, extreme response style and midpoint response style.
Abstract: Chaplaincy research is dominated by self-report data collected directly from research subjects or participants. Self-report response bias is the research measurement inaccuracy that originates with the respondent. A review of research published in The Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling (1998–2008) found that all but one of thirty-eight research articles used self-report data. Of this total, less than half acknowledged methodological limitations, and only two acknowledged the potential impact of self-report response bias.This article focuses on seven categories of self-report response bias that may impact chaplaincy research: social desirability, acquiescence, leniency or harshness, critical event or recency, halo effect, extreme response style and midpoint response style. Although these biases have the potential to impact self-report data, the data themselves are not inherently flawed. This discussion offers recommendations for addressing self-report response bias during the research process. It also s...
TL;DR: The impact of daily visits from Chaplains on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was investigated in this paper, where a pilot study was conducted to evaluate the impact of these visits on patients.
Abstract: (2001). The Impact of Daily Visits from Chaplains on Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Pilot Study. Chaplaincy Today: Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 5-11.
TL;DR: The development of the concept of spiritual risk is described and how measures to screen for spiritual risk can be developed and tested are described, and the implications of screening forspiritual risk for the work of chaplains and other health professionals are discussed.
Abstract: Recent research about religion and health points toward the concept of spiritual risk, being at risk for poor health outcomes as a result of underdeveloped, conflicted, overwhelmed, or negative spirituality. This paper will: 1) describe the development of the concept of spiritual risk, 2) define the concept of spiritual risk, 3) describe the need for screening for spiritual risk, 4) describe how measures to screen for spiritual risk can be developed and tested, and 5) discuss the implications of screening for spiritual risk for the work of chaplains and other health professionals.
TL;DR: This article demonstrates how guidelines and preferred practices for quality palliative/hospice care, written by the National Consensus Project and the National Quality Forum, may be operationalized in practice.
Abstract: (2008). The National Agenda for Quality Palliative Care: The Essential Elements of Spirituality in End-of-life Care. Chaplaincy Today: Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 15-21.