Example of Social Currents format
Recent searches

Example of Social Currents format Example of Social Currents format Example of Social Currents format Example of Social Currents format Example of Social Currents format Example of Social Currents format Example of Social Currents format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Social Currents format Example of Social Currents format Example of Social Currents format Example of Social Currents format Example of Social Currents format Example of Social Currents format Example of Social Currents format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Social Currents — Template for authors

Publisher: SAGE
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Social Sciences (all) #44 of 260 down down by 5 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 130 Published Papers | 382 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 18/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.5
SJR: 0.641
SNIP: 1.243
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.3
SJR: 0.297
SNIP: 0.958
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.0
SJR: 1.844
SNIP: 2.237
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 0.801
SNIP: 2.155

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

2.9

4% from 2019

CiteRatio for Social Currents from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.9
2019 2.8
2018 2.4
2017 2.5
2016 3.1
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.673

33% from 2019

SJR for Social Currents from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.673
2019 1.004
2018 1.075
2017 0.968
2016 0.855
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.217

2% from 2019

SNIP for Social Currents from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.217
2019 1.188
2018 1.042
2017 1.365
2016 1.127
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 4% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 33% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 2% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Social Currents

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

SAGE

Social Currents

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Social Currents formatting guidelines as mentioned in SAGE author instructions. The current version was created on 18 Jul 2020 and has been used by 129 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

i
Last updated on
18 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
2329-4965
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SageV
i
Citation Type
Numbered (Superscripted)
25
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M and Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 1982; 25(7): 4515–4532. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/2329496516686620
Predatory Inclusion and Education Debt: Rethinking the Racial Wealth Gap:
Louise Seamster1, Raphaël Charron-Chénier2
03 Jan 2017 - Social currents

Abstract:

Analyses of the recent surge in racial wealth inequality have tended to focus on changes in asset holdings. Debt patterns, by contrast, have remained relatively unexplored. Using 2001 to 2013 data ... Analyses of the recent surge in racial wealth inequality have tended to focus on changes in asset holdings. Debt patterns, by contrast, have remained relatively unexplored. Using 2001 to 2013 data ... read more read less
218 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/2329496517704872
Wealth Inequality and Carbon Emissions in High-income Countries:
Kyle W. Knight1, Juliet B. Schor2, Andrew K. Jorgenson2
27 Apr 2017 - Social currents

Abstract:

This study contributes to the emerging literature on connections between climate change and economic inequality by investigating the relationship between domestic wealth inequality and consumption-... This study contributes to the emerging literature on connections between climate change and economic inequality by investigating the relationship between domestic wealth inequality and consumption-... read more read less
184 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/2329496513514032
The Relational Generation of Workplace Inequalities
Donald Tomaskovic-Devey1
01 Feb 2014 - Social currents

Abstract:

In this article, I outline a dynamic, relational theory of workplace inequalities. I begin with the basic model offered by Charles Tilly in Durable Inequality that categorical distinctions, such as gender or education, are mapped, exaggerated, and naturalized within organizational divisions of labor. This argument is attracti... In this article, I outline a dynamic, relational theory of workplace inequalities. I begin with the basic model offered by Charles Tilly in Durable Inequality that categorical distinctions, such as gender or education, are mapped, exaggerated, and naturalized within organizational divisions of labor. This argument is attractive in the generality and simplicity of its causal account, yet fairly weak in specifying (1) core organizational processes, (2) the micro-foundations and interactions that generate inequalities, and (3) the potential of intersectional dynamics to disrupt the durability of categorical inequalities. I offer an integrated interactional-organizational-institutional perspective on the relational processes that generate inequalities. read more read less
183 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/2329496515604644
Contemporary Religion and the Cisgendering of Reality
J. E. Sumerau1, Ryan T. Cragun1, Lain A. B. Mathers2
01 Sep 2016 - Social currents

Abstract:

This article outlines a generic process in the reproduction of inequality we name cisgendering reality. Based on 114 responses from transgender Mormons and systematic reviews of religious, transgen... This article outlines a generic process in the reproduction of inequality we name cisgendering reality. Based on 114 responses from transgender Mormons and systematic reviews of religious, transgen... read more read less
108 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/2329496514540132
Environmental Disputes and Opportunity-Threat Impacts Surrounding Natural Gas Fracking in Louisiana:
Anthony E. Ladd1
20 Aug 2014 - Social currents

Abstract:

Despite the increasing socioenvironmental controversy over the use of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing technology in unconventional natural gas development (i.e., fracking), few sociological studies have used citizen interview narratives to examine attitudes toward shale fracking at the local level. Drawing on soc... Despite the increasing socioenvironmental controversy over the use of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing technology in unconventional natural gas development (i.e., fracking), few sociological studies have used citizen interview narratives to examine attitudes toward shale fracking at the local level. Drawing on sociological research, discursive documents, and in-depth interview data collected from regional stakeholder groups/citizens, this article offers a qualitative analysis of the environmental disputes and opportunity-threat impacts perceived to surround natural gas exploration and hydraulic fracking in the Haynesville Shale region of Louisiana. The narratives reveal that the fracking dispute largely revolves around divergent diagnostic and prognostic beliefs about shale gas development, as well as whether the perceived economic opportunities of development outweigh the alleged socioenvironmental risks to the Haynesville community. Some conclusions about the utility of qualitative research ... read more read less
89 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Social Currents.

It automatically formats your research paper to SAGE formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Social Currents format uses SageV citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Social Currents in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Social Currents guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Social Currents guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Social Currents guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Social Currents?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Social Currents citation style.

4. Can I use the Social Currents templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Social Currents.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Social Currents that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Social Currents that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Social Currents?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Social Currents.

7. Where can I find the template for the Social Currents?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Social Currents's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Social Currents's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Social Currents an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Social Currents is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Social Currents?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Social Currents?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Social Currents?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Social Currents, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Social Currents's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Social Currents?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Social Currents. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Social Currents?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Social Currents are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Social Currents?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Social Currents's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Social Currents in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Social Currents Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Social Currents formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template