Example of Journal of English Linguistics format
Recent searches

Example of Journal of English Linguistics format Example of Journal of English Linguistics format Example of Journal of English Linguistics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Journal of English Linguistics format Example of Journal of English Linguistics format Example of Journal of English Linguistics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Journal of English Linguistics — Template for authors

Publisher: SAGE
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Language and Linguistics #152 of 879 down down by 19 ranks
Linguistics and Language #170 of 935 down down by 21 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 51 Published Papers | 84 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 19/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.1
SJR: 0.832
SNIP: 1.154
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.5
SJR: 1.614
SNIP: 2.163
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.8
SJR: 1.269
SNIP: 1.936
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.3
SJR: 0.947
SNIP: 1.603

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

0.962

11% from 2018

Impact factor for Journal of English Linguistics from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 0.962
2018 0.864
2017 0.609
2016 0.84
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.6

CiteRatio for Journal of English Linguistics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.6
2019 1.6
2018 1.6
2017 1.4
2016 1.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 11% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.518

20% from 2019

SJR for Journal of English Linguistics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.518
2019 0.644
2018 0.703
2017 0.606
2016 0.233
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.187

33% from 2019

SNIP for Journal of English Linguistics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.187
2019 1.76
2018 1.342
2017 1.017
2016 1.245
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 20% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 33% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Journal of English Linguistics

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

SAGE

Journal of English Linguistics

Journal of English Linguistics: The EDitor invites submissions on the modern and historical periods of the English language. JEngL normally publishes synchronic and diachronic studies on subjects from Old and Middle English to modern English grammar, corpus linguistics, and di...... Read More

Language and Linguistics

Linguistics and Language

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
18 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0075-4242
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.762
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SageV
i
Citation Type
Numbered (Superscripted)
25
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M and Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 1982; 25(7): 4515–4532. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/0075424207311247
Fleeing, Sneaking, Flooding A Corpus Analysis of Discursive Constructions of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press, 1996-2005
Costas Gabrielatos, Paul Baker1

Abstract:

This paper examines the discursive construction of refugees and asylum seekers (and to a lesser extent immigrants and migrants) in a 140-million-word corpus of UK press articles published between 1996 and 2005. Taking a corpus-based approach, the data were analyzed not only as a whole, but also with regard to synchronic varia... This paper examines the discursive construction of refugees and asylum seekers (and to a lesser extent immigrants and migrants) in a 140-million-word corpus of UK press articles published between 1996 and 2005. Taking a corpus-based approach, the data were analyzed not only as a whole, but also with regard to synchronic variation, by carrying out concordance analyses of keywords which occurred within tabloid and broad-sheet newspapers, and diachronic change, albeit mainly approached from an unusual angle, by investigating consistent collocates and frequencies of specific terms over time. The analyses point to a number of (mainly negative) categories of representation, the existence and development of nonsensical terms (e.g., illegal refugee), and media confusion and conflation of definitions of the four terms under examination. The paper concludes by critically discussing the extent to which a corpus-based methodological stance can inform critical discourse analysis. read more read less
608 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/0075424206290692
Mobility, Indexicality, and the Enregisterment of “Pittsburghese”
Barbara Johnstone1, Jennifer Andrus1, Andrew E. Danielson2

Abstract:

This article explores the sociolinguistic history of a U.S. city. On the basis of historical research, ethnography, discourse analysis, and sociolinguistic interviews, the authors describe how a set of linguistic features that were once not noticed at all, then used and heard primarily as markers of socioeconomic class, have ... This article explores the sociolinguistic history of a U.S. city. On the basis of historical research, ethnography, discourse analysis, and sociolinguistic interviews, the authors describe how a set of linguistic features that were once not noticed at all, then used and heard primarily as markers of socioeconomic class, have come to be linked increasingly to place and “enregistered” as a dialect called “Pittsburghese.” To explain how this has come about, the authors draw on the semiotic concept of “orders of indexicality.” They suggest that social and geographical mobility during the latter half of the twentieth century has played a crucial role in the process. They model a particularistic approach to linguistic and ideological change that is sensitive not only to ideas about language that circulate in the media but also to the life experiences of particular speakers; and they show how an understanding of linguistic variation, language attitudes, and the stylized performance of dialect is enhanced by expl... read more read less
589 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/00754240122005305
Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis
Pepi Leistyna1

Abstract:

It is imperative that linguists and educators (and all social theorists and cultural workers for that matter) move beyond the mainstream conceptual limitations of discourse presented as multiple utterances produced within a social context. Unfortunately, this definition, virtually disconnected from the historical, economic, s... It is imperative that linguists and educators (and all social theorists and cultural workers for that matter) move beyond the mainstream conceptual limitations of discourse presented as multiple utterances produced within a social context. Unfortunately, this definition, virtually disconnected from the historical, economic, social, and institutional relations within which language is produced, only invokes analysis around such depoliticized aspects as semantics, pragmatics, and the paralinguistics of body language and prosodics. Over the past century, more critical understandings of language, from Valentin Volosinov and Mikhail Bakhtin to Michel Foucault and beyond, have given rise to definitions of the concept of discourse that are far more socially and politically revealing. From such critical perspectives, discourse has evolved into the complex “ways in which reality is perceived through and shaped by historically and socially constructed ways of making sense, that is, language, complex signs, and practices that order and sustain particular forms of social existence” (Leistyna 1996, 336). As Stuart Hall (1997, 6) observes, read more read less
482 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/00754240022005117
Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language:

Abstract:

Language is arguably the most distinctive characteristic of the human species; we are not just creatures that walk upright or that use tools or even that know. We are creatures that talk, Homo loquens. Because language is at the center of our humanity, it is a matter of central importance and interest to us. People like to ta... Language is arguably the most distinctive characteristic of the human species; we are not just creatures that walk upright or that use tools or even that know. We are creatures that talk, Homo loquens. Because language is at the center of our humanity, it is a matter of central importance and interest to us. People like to talk about talk; they are interested in the way they use language; they know, at least subliminally, that language is important. Because linguists are people who are supposed to know something serious, important, and real about language, they have a special obligation to pass on what they know to the general public. Steven Pinker makes an effort to inform nonlinguists about the mysteries of linguistic theories and facts. Whether or not one agrees with Pinker’s theoretical stances, one must applaud his clarity of exposition, his skill at argumentation, and his perceptions of the wider implications of linguistic matters. Words and Rules is an extended exposition of certain propositions, some fairly basic and some engagingly speculative. Specifically, the book proposes and cites evidence for a series of oppositions involving linguistic and mental structure: read more read less
428 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/00754249922004426
Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and Its Social Significance
Edgar W. Schneider1

Abstract:

Whenever a new textbook appears in an embattled market segment, one of the main questions to ask is how it compares with its established competitors and whether it is sufficiently distinct and innovative to stand a chance of breaking into occupied territory. In the present case, the answer is clearly in the affirmative. Al th... Whenever a new textbook appears in an embattled market segment, one of the main questions to ask is how it compares with its established competitors and whether it is sufficiently distinct and innovative to stand a chance of breaking into occupied territory. In the present case, the answer is clearly in the affirmative. Al though there is no dearth of surveys of sociolinguistics, Chambers’s book is differ ent, and it is well worth reading and buying for at least two reasons. First, it is the matically more focused than all competing books: While in all other sociolinguistic handbooks we find chapters on “macro-sociolinguistic” topics such as accents and dialects, “language in society,” multilingualism, language policy, or even pidgins and creoles, this is the only book that concentrates exclusively upon descriptive correlational micro-sociolinguistics, the Labovian-style paradigm of variation and change in the narrow sense. Second, although this volume is clearly also conceived and structured as a textbook, it is much more than that, as is indicated by the word “theory” in its title. In addition to the overview of issues, assumptions, and problems that may be expected, the author presents pleas for new, disputed, or idiosyncratic positions, open to discussion and of substantive interest to the specialist, irrespective of whether or not one would agree. In the following discussion, I will be treating these two levels consecutively. The book is very clearly structured. After an introductory chapter with defini tions and theoretical groundwork, there are three chapters on the most important so ciological categories, class, gender, and age, respectively, before the concluding section attempts an overall explanatory account of covariation phenomena. Chapter 1, “Correlations,” explains some basic notions of sociolinguistics, including varia tion, variables, and the methodological advantages of quantification, and then sets off the variationist framework from the categorical thinking which has prevailed in linguistics outside sociolinguistic circles. A theory of parole/performance, like the sociolinguistic understanding of language, must be consistent with theories of lan guage/competence like the Chomskyan paradigm, the author claims, although he is read more read less
358 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Journal of English Linguistics.

It automatically formats your research paper to SAGE formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Journal of English Linguistics format uses SageV citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Journal of English Linguistics in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Journal of English Linguistics guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Journal of English Linguistics guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Journal of English Linguistics guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Journal of English Linguistics?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Journal of English Linguistics citation style.

4. Can I use the Journal of English Linguistics templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Journal of English Linguistics.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Journal of English Linguistics that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Journal of English Linguistics that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Journal of English Linguistics?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Journal of English Linguistics.

7. Where can I find the template for the Journal of English Linguistics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Journal of English Linguistics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Journal of English Linguistics's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Journal of English Linguistics an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Journal of English Linguistics is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Journal of English Linguistics?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Journal of English Linguistics?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Journal of English Linguistics?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Journal of English Linguistics, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Journal of English Linguistics's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Journal of English Linguistics?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Journal of English Linguistics. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Journal of English Linguistics?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Journal of English Linguistics are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Journal of English Linguistics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Journal of English Linguistics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Journal of English Linguistics in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Journal of English Linguistics Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Journal of English Linguistics formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template