Example of Clinical Nursing Research format
Recent searches

Example of Clinical Nursing Research format Example of Clinical Nursing Research format Example of Clinical Nursing Research format Example of Clinical Nursing Research format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Clinical Nursing Research format Example of Clinical Nursing Research format Example of Clinical Nursing Research format Example of Clinical Nursing Research format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Clinical Nursing Research — Template for authors

Publisher: SAGE
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Nursing (all) #24 of 112 up up by 2 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 214 Published Papers | 586 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 16/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.1
SJR: 1.073
SNIP: 2.014
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.6
SJR: 0.548
SNIP: 1.189
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.0
SJR: 0.924
SNIP: 1.356
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.2
SJR: 1.4
SNIP: 2.223

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.538

3% from 2018

Impact factor for Clinical Nursing Research from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.538
2018 1.5
2017 1.466
2016 1.311
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.7

17% from 2019

CiteRatio for Clinical Nursing Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.7
2019 2.3
2018 2.1
2017 2.2
2016 2.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 3% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 17% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.515

7% from 2019

SJR for Clinical Nursing Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.515
2019 0.483
2018 0.475
2017 0.471
2016 0.457
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.989

15% from 2019

SNIP for Clinical Nursing Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.989
2019 0.858
2018 0.774
2017 0.89
2016 0.701
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Clinical Nursing Research

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

SAGE

Clinical Nursing Research

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Clinical Nursing Research formatting guidelines as mentioned in SAGE author instructions. The current version was created on 16 Jun 2020 and has been used by 321 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Nursing

i
Last updated on
16 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1054-7738
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.745
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SageV
i
Citation Type
Numbered (Superscripted)
25
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M and Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 1982; 25(7): 4515–4532. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/1054773818803170
The Use of Videoconferencing for Qualitative Interviewing: Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations:
Elliane Irani1

Abstract:

Interviewing is a useful method to collect qualitative research data about phenomena that cannot be directly observed. Traditionally, in-person interviews have been perceived as the gold standard because they represent a natural encounter where the interviewer communicates and builds rapport with participants while observing ... Interviewing is a useful method to collect qualitative research data about phenomena that cannot be directly observed. Traditionally, in-person interviews have been perceived as the gold standard because they represent a natural encounter where the interviewer communicates and builds rapport with participants while observing their body language and the environment. In previous years, there has been a debate about the use of the telephone to conduct interviews for qualitative research (Novick, 2008). Telephone interviewing was perceived as a more accepted approach for structured quantitative data collection due to its limited potential to connect with participants, stimulate a natural conversation, and observe nonverbal cues. More recently, with advancements in communication technology and due to the wide availability of the Internet, videoconferencing is gaining increased attention as an alternative to traditional modes of interviews for qualitative research. Videoconferencing as a communication technology allows for a real-time, online synchronous conversation to occur, with the ability to send and receive audiovisual information (Salmons, 2012). Compared with other online methods for qualitative data collection (i.e., email interviews, online forums, and instant messaging), videoconferencing more closely resembles the in-person qualitative interview (Tuttas, 2015). read more read less
View PDF
252 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/10547739922158368
Tattooing and body piercing. Body art practices among college students.
Judith Greif1, Walter R. Hewitt Jr. Jr1, Myrna L. Armstrong2

Abstract:

Tattooing and body piercing are increasing, especially among college students. A study of 766 tattooed and/or body-pierced college students in 18 universities across the United States and one in Australia was conducted to discover the demographic characteristics, motivational factors, and health concerns. The traditional coll... Tattooing and body piercing are increasing, especially among college students. A study of 766 tattooed and/or body-pierced college students in 18 universities across the United States and one in Australia was conducted to discover the demographic characteristics, motivational factors, and health concerns. The traditional college time of 18 to 22 years of age (69%) was when they obtained their tattoo (73%) and/or body piercing (63%). More frequent health problems and impulsive decision making were noted for those with body piercing when compared to those tattooed. Three cases of hepatitis were reported. Health professionals should openly discuss body art with students, convey a nonjudgmental attitude, and assist with informed decision-making information to either reduce risks or dissuade. Open communication and applicable health education will be very important. read more read less
203 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/10547738221125632
COVID Symptoms, Symptom Clusters, and Predictors for Becoming a Long-Hauler Looking for Clarity in the Haze of the Pandemic

Abstract:

Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) is defined as persistent symptoms after apparent recovery from acute COVID-19 infection, also known as COVID-19 long-haul. We performed a retrospective review of electronic health records (EHR) from the University of California COvid Research Data Set (UC CORDS), a de-identified EHR of... Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) is defined as persistent symptoms after apparent recovery from acute COVID-19 infection, also known as COVID-19 long-haul. We performed a retrospective review of electronic health records (EHR) from the University of California COvid Research Data Set (UC CORDS), a de-identified EHR of PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2-positive patients in California. The purposes were to (1) describe the prevalence of PASC, (2) describe COVID-19 symptoms and symptom clusters, and (3) identify risk factors for PASC. Data were subjected to non-negative matrix factorization to identify symptom clusters, and a predictive model of PASC was developed. PASC prevalence was 11% (277/2,153), and of these patients, 66% (183/277) were considered asymptomatic at days 0–30. Five PASC symptom clusters emerged and specific symptoms at days 0–30 were associated with PASC. Women were more likely than men to develop PASC, with all age groups and ethnicities represented. PASC is a public health priority. read more read less
View PDF
176 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/1054773816666280
Why Is the One-Group Pretest–Posttest Design Still Used?:
Thomas R. Knapp1, Thomas R. Knapp2

Abstract:

The one-group pretest-posttest pre-experimental design has been widely criticized, yet continues to be used in some clinical nursing research studies. This editorial explains what is wrong with the design, suggests reasons for its continued use, and gives some recommendations regarding what can be done about it. The one-group pretest-posttest pre-experimental design has been widely criticized, yet continues to be used in some clinical nursing research studies. This editorial explains what is wrong with the design, suggests reasons for its continued use, and gives some recommendations regarding what can be done about it. read more read less
View PDF
166 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/1054773804267878
Chronic disease self-management improved with enhanced self-efficacy.
Kathleen Farrell1, Mona Wicks, Judy C. Martin

Abstract:

This pilot study used a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design to examine if participation in a chronic disease self-management program (CDSMP) improved self-efficacy, self-efficacy health, and self-management behaviors in an underserved, poor, rural population. The sample, recruited from two clinics in a south central st... This pilot study used a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design to examine if participation in a chronic disease self-management program (CDSMP) improved self-efficacy, self-efficacy health, and self-management behaviors in an underserved, poor, rural population. The sample, recruited from two clinics in a south central state, consisted of 48 adults (59.70 +/- 11.22 years) and was 79.2% Caucasian (n = 38) and 20.8% (n = 10) African American. Trained lay leaders with chronic illnesses directed the interactive CDSMP based on Bandura's self-efficacy theory that included strategies for personal exercise program development, cognitive symptom management, problem solving, and communication skills. Program-specific paper-and-pencil instruments were completed prior to and immediately after completion of the 6-week program. Significant improvements (p <.10) in self-efficacy, self-efficacy health, and self-management behaviors occurred. Results underscore the need to evaluate intervention programs for specific populations and for a new paradigm that focuses on patient-provider partnerships that can improve health outcomes in underserved, poor, rural populations. read more read less
146 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Clinical Nursing Research.

It automatically formats your research paper to SAGE formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Clinical Nursing Research format uses SageV citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Clinical Nursing Research in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Clinical Nursing Research guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Clinical Nursing Research guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Clinical Nursing Research guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Clinical Nursing Research?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Clinical Nursing Research citation style.

4. Can I use the Clinical Nursing Research templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Clinical Nursing Research.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Clinical Nursing Research that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Clinical Nursing Research that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Clinical Nursing Research?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Clinical Nursing Research.

7. Where can I find the template for the Clinical Nursing Research?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Clinical Nursing Research's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Clinical Nursing Research's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Clinical Nursing Research an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Clinical Nursing Research is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Clinical Nursing Research?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Clinical Nursing Research?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Clinical Nursing Research?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Clinical Nursing Research, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Clinical Nursing Research's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Clinical Nursing Research?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Clinical Nursing Research. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Clinical Nursing Research?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Clinical Nursing Research are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Clinical Nursing Research?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Clinical Nursing Research's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Clinical Nursing Research in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Clinical Nursing Research Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Clinical Nursing Research formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template