Example of Social Science Japan Journal format
Recent searches

Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format Example of Social Science Japan Journal format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Social Science Japan Journal — Template for authors

Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Social Sciences (all) #85 of 260 up up by 33 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 49 Published Papers | 74 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 05/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.5
SJR: 0.641
SNIP: 1.243
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.3
SJR: 0.297
SNIP: 0.958
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.0
SJR: 1.844
SNIP: 2.237
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 0.801
SNIP: 2.155

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

0.815

14% from 2018

Impact factor for Social Science Japan Journal from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 0.815
2018 0.947
2017 0.5
2016 0.278
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.5

36% from 2019

CiteRatio for Social Science Japan Journal from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.5
2019 1.1
2018 1.0
2017 0.7
2016 0.6
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 14% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 36% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.3

3% from 2019

SJR for Social Science Japan Journal from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.3
2019 0.292
2018 0.14
2017 0.201
2016 0.174
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.154

6% from 2019

SNIP for Social Science Japan Journal from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.154
2019 1.222
2018 1.246
2017 0.895
2016 0.483
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Social Science Japan Journal

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Oxford University Press

Social Science Japan Journal

Social Science Japan Journal (SSJJ) publishes high-quality, refereed scholarly articles on modern Japan. All social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, history, law, political science, and sociology) are represented, including studies of Japans international relation...... Read More

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
05 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1369-1465
i
Impact Factor
Low - 0.278
i
Acceptance Rate
Not provided
i
Frequency
Not provided
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
unsrt
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
C. W. J. Beenakker. Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97(6):067007, 2006.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1093/SSJJ/JYW017
Capital in the Twenty-First Century
Susumu Cato1

Abstract:

It is difficult to think of a recent book by a social scientist, and impossible to think of one by an economist, that is of as much potential interest to historians as Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Its central question is an inherently historical one about the relationship between capital accumulation ... It is difficult to think of a recent book by a social scientist, and impossible to think of one by an economist, that is of as much potential interest to historians as Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Its central question is an inherently historical one about the relationship between capital accumulation and inequality in the very long run. And the theory that Piketty proposes by way of an answer—that rising inequality is inherent to the dynamics of capitalism—depends for its persuasiveness on the historical analysis he draws on to substantiate it. The book also deserves historians’ attention for Piketty’s admonishment of economists for “their absurd claim to greater scientific legitimacy, despite the fact that they know almost nothing about anything” (p. 32), and his enthusiasm for the study of history as an antidote. Indeed, in Piketty’s mind, his book is “as much a work of history as of economics” (p. 33). Certainly historians will learn a great deal from the impressive research program that Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez, Anthony Atkinson, and others have undertaken on the history of inequality. Yet if Piketty had wanted to write a book that was just about inequality, he would not have called it “Capital.” He has bigger fish to fry—no less than the relationship between economic growth, capital accumulation, and inequality—but the book disappoints when it comes to linking its larger claims to historical analysis. The crucial question that Piketty addresses is whether, in the process of economic development, the convergence or divergence of incomes and wealth dominates. Piketty argues that the “lessons of history” reveal capitalism’s structural tendency to generate higher levels of inequality over time, belying the claims of optimists embodied in the so-called Kuznets curve, that inequality increases during the early stage of economic growth but declines later on. Instead, what Piketty describes as “the fundamental force for divergence” kicks in when the economy grows slowly—when the growth rate (g) is lower than the return on capital (r)—which he claims is the rule in capitalism. That means that over time the capital stock takes on “disproportionate importance” relative to economic output and returns to capitalists increase relative to returns to labor. Most of Capital in the Twenty-First Century is taken up with an analysis of historical trends to support the book’s controversial claim that capitalism breeds inequality. Piketty begins with economic growth, claiming that, despite “the spectacular increase in standards of living since the Industrial Revolution” (p. 87), growth rates will decline in the future. He contends that population growth “explains” half of the economic growth that has occurred in the world since the beginning of the nineteenth century, and suggests the implausibility of equally high rates of population growth in the future. Yet his analysis elides the complexity of the historical relationship between population and economic growth; as Piketty’s nemesis, Simon Kuznets, pointed out many years ago, the historical association between population growth and economic growth is loose over time and across countries and, even when it exists, does not necessarily imply causation (Kuznets, “Population and Economic Growth,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 111, no. 3 [1967]: 170–193). It is for this reason that historians tend to look to growth in output per head, rather than the number of heads, for explanations of economic growth. When Piketty turns to productivity growth, he is also confident that it will be lower in the future than the past but, in historical terms, he is on still thinner ice. He never actually offers any explanation of “the spectacular increase in per capita output” (p. 93) in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, so it is unclear what basis he has for concluding that the forces that drove economic growth in the past will no longer operate in the future. Strikingly, when Piketty alludes to the dynamics that foster economic growth—technology, innovation, knowledge diffusion—there is one word that he never uses: capital. There have been serious debates in economic history about the importance of capital formation in the process of economic development, with the Industrial Revolution being an especially striking case in point. Yet Piketty omits any historical analysis of the productive role of capital—capital to buy machines or to hold inventories—capital, that is, in the most prosaic sense of the term. The omission puts him on an entirely different wavelength than historians who study the role of capital in the economies of the past, and surely explains why he relies so little on their work. The modest attention that Piketty pays to the role that capital plays in the process of economic development stems from his definition of capital as “the sum total of nonhuman assets that can be owned and exchanged on some market” (p. 46). Thus, capital can include machines and inventories but it can also include residential property and financial assets. Indeed, Piketty’s capital is so encompassing as to be amorphous, which explains why in part II, on the historical dynamics of capital, we experience a growing sense of abstraction. As a historian of capital, Piketty is a “lumper” not a “splitter” with his sights set on measuring the historical relationship between aggregate capital and national income. Prior to World War I, what Piketty emphasizes is the overall stability of the capital-income ratio. Then history changes radically with the shocks of World War I and the Depression and we witness a collapse in the capital-income ratio in Europe—where “[b]y the mid564 Featured Reviews read more read less
312 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1093/SSJJ/JYN058
Securing Japan: Tokyo's Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia
Yujen Kuo1

Abstract:

For the past sixty years, the U.S. government has assumed that Japan's security policies would reinforce American interests in Asia. The political and military profile of Asia is changing rapidly, however. Korea's nuclear program, China's rise, and the relative decline of U.S. power have commanded strategic review in Tokyo ju... For the past sixty years, the U.S. government has assumed that Japan's security policies would reinforce American interests in Asia. The political and military profile of Asia is changing rapidly, however. Korea's nuclear program, China's rise, and the relative decline of U.S. power have commanded strategic review in Tokyo just as these matters have in Washington. What is the next step for Japan's security policy? Will confluence with U.S. interests-and the alliance-survive intact? Will the policy be transformed? Or will Japan become more autonomous? Richard J. Samuels demonstrates that over the last decade, a revisionist group of Japanese policymakers has consolidated power. The Koizumi government of the early 2000s took bold steps to position Japan's military to play a global security role. It left its successor, the Abe government, to further define and legitimate Japan's new grand strategy, a project well under way-and vigorously contested both at home and in the region. Securing Japan begins by tracing the history of Japan's grand strategy-from the Meiji rulers, who recognized the intimate connection between economic success and military advance, to the Konoye consensus that led to Japan's defeat in World War II and the postwar compact with the United States. Samuels shows how the ideological connections across these wars and agreements help explain today's debate. He then explores Japan's recent strategic choices, arguing that Japan will ultimately strike a balance between national strength and national autonomy, a position that will allow it to exist securely without being either too dependent on the United States or too vulnerable to threats from China. Samuels's insights into Japanese history, society, and politics have been honed over a distinguished career and enriched by interviews with policymakers and original archival research. Securing Japan is a definitive assessment of Japanese security policy and its implications for the future of East Asia. read more read less
199 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1093/SSJJ/JYM029
Jobless Youths and the NEET Problem in Japan

Abstract:

This paper empirically examines the determinants of non-employed young Japanese people, whose number increased from the 1990s to the beginning of the 2000s. Non-working unmarried persons aged 15–34, who do not attend school, are classified into three types: ‘job seekers’ (type 1), who search for jobs; ‘non-job seekers’ (type ... This paper empirically examines the determinants of non-employed young Japanese people, whose number increased from the 1990s to the beginning of the 2000s. Non-working unmarried persons aged 15–34, who do not attend school, are classified into three types: ‘job seekers’ (type 1), who search for jobs; ‘non-job seekers’ (type 2), who express a desire to work but do not search for jobs, and ‘non-job seekers’ (type 3), who express no desire to work. Those in type 2 and type 3, non-job seekers, are defined to be ‘NEET’ or ‘not in employment, education or training’. Multinomial logistic regression results show that young persons whose expected returns from working are low—such as females, older people, the less educated and the long-term jobless—tend to refrain from working and become non-job seekers. Moreover, there is evidence of an income effect that makes youths from wealthy families more likely to be type 3 non-job seekers. However, the number of jobless youths from lower-income households has been increasing and hence, the income effect on type 3 jobless has become less relevant recently. As a result, young, less-educated males from poor families in Japan have become more likely to lose interest in work rather than those in middle-income families. read more read less
View PDF
119 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Social Science Japan Journal.

It automatically formats your research paper to Oxford University Press formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Social Science Japan Journal format uses unsrt citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Social Science Japan Journal in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Social Science Japan Journal guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Social Science Japan Journal guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Social Science Japan Journal guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Social Science Japan Journal?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Social Science Japan Journal citation style.

4. Can I use the Social Science Japan Journal templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Social Science Japan Journal.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Social Science Japan Journal that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Social Science Japan Journal that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Social Science Japan Journal?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Social Science Japan Journal.

7. Where can I find the template for the Social Science Japan Journal?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Social Science Japan Journal's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Social Science Japan Journal's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Social Science Japan Journal an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Social Science Japan Journal is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Social Science Japan Journal?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Social Science Japan Journal?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Social Science Japan Journal?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Social Science Japan Journal, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Social Science Japan Journal's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Social Science Japan Journal?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Social Science Japan Journal. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Social Science Japan Journal?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Social Science Japan Journal are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Social Science Japan Journal?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Social Science Japan Journal's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Social Science Japan Journal in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Social Science Japan Journal Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Social Science Japan Journal formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template