Example of Australian Health Review format
Recent searches

Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format Example of Australian Health Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Australian Health Review — Template for authors

Publisher: CSIRO Publishing
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Health Policy #109 of 242 down down by 3 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 442 Published Papers | 1109 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 27/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 1.216
SNIP: 3.119
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.3
SJR: 0.603
SNIP: 1.079
open access Open Access

Dove Medical Press

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.7
SJR: 0.591
SNIP: 0.83
open access Open Access

Dove Medical Press

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.8
SJR: 0.885
SNIP: 1.285

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.32

7% from 2018

Impact factor for Australian Health Review from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.32
2018 1.228
2017 1.036
2016 1.343
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.5

14% from 2019

CiteRatio for Australian Health Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.5
2019 2.2
2018 2.1
2017 2.1
2016 1.9
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 7% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 14% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.644

14% from 2019

SJR for Australian Health Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.644
2019 0.566
2018 0.531
2017 0.55
2016 0.468
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.909

5% from 2019

SNIP for Australian Health Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.909
2019 0.956
2018 0.711
2017 0.801
2016 0.689
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 14% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 5% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Australian Health Review

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

CSIRO Publishing

Australian Health Review

Australian Health Review explores major national and international health issues and questions. Topics covered by the Journal include all aspects of health policy and management, healthcare delivery systems, workforce, health financing and other matters of interest to those wo...... Read More

Health Policy

Medicine

i
Last updated on
27 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0156-5788
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.704
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
CSIRO Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al., 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder, G. E., Tinkham, M. and Klapwijk, T. M. (1982). Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge im-balance, and supercurrent conversion, Phys. Rev. B 25(7), 4515–4532. URL: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article
Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires
01 Aug 2006 - Australian Health Review
3,059 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article
Redefining Health Care: Creating Value-Based Competition on Results
01 Nov 2006 - Australian Health Review

Abstract:

A solution to get the problem off, have you found it? Really? What kind of solution do you resolve the problem? From what sources? Well, there are so many questions that we utter every day. No matter how you will get the solution, it will mean better. You can take the reference from some books. And the redefining health care ... A solution to get the problem off, have you found it? Really? What kind of solution do you resolve the problem? From what sources? Well, there are so many questions that we utter every day. No matter how you will get the solution, it will mean better. You can take the reference from some books. And the redefining health care creating value based competition on results is one book that we really recommend you to read, to get more solutions in solving this problem. read more read less
965 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1071/AH000216
The burden of disease and injury in Australia
Colin Mathers, Theo Vos, Christopher Stevenson
01 Jan 2000 - Australian Health Review

Abstract:

Reviewed by Don Hindle, Visiting Professor, School of Health Services Management,University of New South Wales
View PDF
770 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1071/AH080766
A decade of data linkage in Western Australia: strategic design, applications and benefits of the WA data linkage system
01 Nov 2008 - Australian Health Review

Abstract:

Objectives: The report describes the strategic design, steps to full implementation and outcomes achieved by the Western Australian Data Linkage System (WADLS), instigated in 1995 to link up to 40 years of data from over 30 collections for an historical population of 3.7 million. Staged development has seen its expansion, ini... Objectives: The report describes the strategic design, steps to full implementation and outcomes achieved by the Western Australian Data Linkage System (WADLS), instigated in 1995 to link up to 40 years of data from over 30 collections for an historical population of 3.7 million. Staged development has seen its expansion, initially from a linkage key to local health data sets, to encompass links to national and local health and welfare data sets, genealogical links and spatial references for mapping applications. Applications: The WADLS has supported over 400 studies with over 250 journal publications and 35 graduate research degrees. Applications have occurred in health services utilisation and outcomes, aetiologic research, disease surveillance and needs analysis, and in methodologic research. Benefits: Longitudinal studies have become cheaper and more complete; deletion of duplicate records and correction of data artifacts have enhanced the quality of information assets; data linkage has conserved patient privacy; community machinery necessary for organised responses to health and social problems has been exercised; and the commercial return on research infrastructure investment has exceeded 1000%. Most importantly, there have been unbiased contributions to medical knowledge and identifiable advances in population health arising from the read more read less
View PDF
544 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1071/AH09794
The reported benefits of telehealth for rural Australians
Jennifer Moffatt1, Diann Eley1
25 Aug 2010 - Australian Health Review

Abstract:

Objective.A literature review was conducted to identify the reported benefits attributed to telehealth for people living and professionals working in rural and remote areas of Australia. Data sources.Scopus and relevant journals and websites were searched using the terms: telemedicine, telehealth, telepsychiatry, teledermatol... Objective.A literature review was conducted to identify the reported benefits attributed to telehealth for people living and professionals working in rural and remote areas of Australia. Data sources.Scopus and relevant journals and websites were searched using the terms: telemedicine, telehealth, telepsychiatry, teledermatology, teleradiology, Australia, and each state and territory. Publications since 1998 were included. Study selection.The initial search resulted in 176 articles, which was reduced to 143 when research reporting on Australian rural, regional or remote populations was selected. Data synthesis.A narrative review was conducted using an existing ‘benefits’ framework. Patients are reported to have benefited from: lower costs and reduced inconvenience while accessing specialist health services; improved access to services and improved quality of clinical services. Health professionals are reported to have benefited from: access to continuing education and professional development; provision of enhanced local services; experiential learning, networking and collaboration. Discussion.Rural Australians have reportedly benefited from telehealth. The reported improved access and quality of clinical care available to rural Australians through telemedicine and telehealth may contribute to decreasing the urban–rural health disparities. The reported professional development opportunities and support from specialists through the use of telehealth may contribute to improved rural medical workforce recruitment and retention. What is known about the topic?An extensive international literature has reported on the efficacy of telehealth, and to a lesser extent the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of telemedicine. Systematic reviews conclude that the quality of the studies preclude definitive conclusions being drawn about clinical and cost-effectiveness, although there is some evidence of effective clinical outcomes and the potential for cost-benefits. Little attention has been paid to the benefits reported for people who live in rural and remote Australia, despite this being a rationale for the use of telehealth in rural and remote locations. What does this paper add?Patients in rural and remote locations in Australia are reported to benefit from telehealth by increased access to health services and up-skilled health professionals. Health professionals are reported to benefit from telehealth by up-skilling from increased contact with specialists and increased access to professional development. The review findings suggest that one strategy, the increased use of telehealth, has the potential to reduce the inequitable access to health services and the poorer health status that many rural Australians experience, and contribute to addressing the on-going problem of the recruitment and retention of the rural health workforce. What are the implications for practitioners?The use of telehealth appears to be a path to up-skilling for rural and remote practitioners. read more read less
372 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Australian Health Review.

It automatically formats your research paper to CSIRO Publishing formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Australian Health Review format uses CSIRO Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Australian Health Review in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Australian Health Review guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Australian Health Review guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Australian Health Review guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Australian Health Review?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Australian Health Review citation style.

4. Can I use the Australian Health Review templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Australian Health Review.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Australian Health Review that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Australian Health Review that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Australian Health Review?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Australian Health Review.

7. Where can I find the template for the Australian Health Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Australian Health Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Australian Health Review's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Australian Health Review an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Australian Health Review is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Australian Health Review?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Australian Health Review?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Australian Health Review?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Australian Health Review, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Australian Health Review's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Australian Health Review?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Australian Health Review. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Australian Health Review?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Australian Health Review are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Australian Health Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Australian Health Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Australian Health Review in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Australian Health Review Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Australian Health Review formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template