Example of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming format
Recent searches

Example of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming format Example of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming format Example of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming format Example of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming format Example of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming format Example of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming format Example of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming format Example of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming format Example of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming format Example of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming format Example of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Theory and Practice of Logic Programming — Template for authors

Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Computational Theory and Mathematics #42 of 133 down down by 18 ranks
Theoretical Computer Science #43 of 120 down down by 18 ranks
Artificial Intelligence #106 of 227 down down by 43 ranks
Hardware and Architecture #77 of 157 down down by 37 ranks
Software #191 of 389 down down by 70 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 156 Published Papers | 546 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 04/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

IEEE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.9
SJR: 0.679
SNIP: 1.934
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.3
SJR: 0.73
SNIP: 1.279
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.9
SJR: 0.638
SNIP: 1.44
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
Good
CiteRatio: 3.8
SJR: 0.373
SNIP: 0.98

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.076

3% from 2018

Impact factor for Theory and Practice of Logic Programming from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.076
2018 1.111
2017 0.875
2016 1.38
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.5

13% from 2019

CiteRatio for Theory and Practice of Logic Programming from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.5
2019 3.1
2018 3.7
2017 3.9
2016 3.6
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 3% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 13% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.685

14% from 2019

SJR for Theory and Practice of Logic Programming from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.685
2019 0.798
2018 0.658
2017 0.524
2016 0.86
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.383

18% from 2019

SNIP for Theory and Practice of Logic Programming from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.383
2019 1.685
2018 1.542
2017 1.534
2016 1.776
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 14% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 18% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Theory and Practice of Logic Programming

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Cambridge University Press

Theory and Practice of Logic Programming

Theory and Practice of Logic Programming emphasises both the theory and practice of logic programming. Logic programming applies to all areas of artificial intelligence and computer science and is fundamental to all of them. Among the topics covered are AI applications that us...... Read More

Computer Science

i
Last updated on
04 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1471-0684
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.925
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
unsrt
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
G E Blonder, M Tinkham, and T M Klapwijk. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25(7):4515–4532, 1982. 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S1471068403001674
Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach

Abstract:

The work reported here introduces Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP), a formalism that combines results of Logic Programming and Defeasible Argumentation. DeLP provides the possibility of representing information in the form of weak rules in a declarative manner, and a defeasible argumentation inference mechanism for warrant... The work reported here introduces Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP), a formalism that combines results of Logic Programming and Defeasible Argumentation. DeLP provides the possibility of representing information in the form of weak rules in a declarative manner, and a defeasible argumentation inference mechanism for warranting the entailed conclusions. In DeLP an argumentation formalism will be used for deciding between contradictory goals. Queries will be supported by arguments that could be defeated by other arguments. A query $q$ will succeed when there is an argument ${\mathcal A}$ for $q$ that is warranted, i.e. the argument ${\mathcal A}$ that supports $q$ is found undefeated by a warrant procedure that implements a dialectical analysis. The defeasible argumentation basis of DeLP allows to build applications that deal with incomplete and contradictory information in dynamic domains. Thus, the resulting approach is suitable for representing agent's knowledge and for providing an argumentation based reasoning mechanism to agents. read more read less
View PDF
949 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S1471068414000076
Inference and learning in probabilistic logic programs using weighted Boolean formulas

Abstract:

Probabilistic logic programs are logic programs in which some of the facts are annotated with probabilities. This paper investigates how classical inference and learning tasks known from the graphical model community can be tackled for probabilistic logic programs. Several such tasks such as computing the marginals given evid... Probabilistic logic programs are logic programs in which some of the facts are annotated with probabilities. This paper investigates how classical inference and learning tasks known from the graphical model community can be tackled for probabilistic logic programs. Several such tasks such as computing the marginals given evidence and learning from (partial) interpretations have not really been addressed for probabilistic logic programs before. The rst contribution of this paper is a suite of ecient algorithms for various inference tasks. It is based on a conversion of the program and the queries and evidence to a weighted Boolean formula. This allows us to reduce the inference tasks to well-studied tasks such as weighted model counting, which can be solved using state-of-the-art methods known from the graphical model and knowledge compilation literature. The second contribution is an algorithm for parameter estimation in the learning from interpretations setting. The algorithm employs Expectation Maximization, and is built on top of the developed inference algorithms. The proposed approach is experimentally evaluated. The results show that the inference algorithms improve upon the state-of-the-art in probabilistic logic programming and that it is indeed possible to learn the parameters of a probabilistic logic program from interpretations. read more read less
View PDF
331 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S1471068419000450
ASP-Core-2 Input Language Format

Abstract:

Standardization of solver input languages has been a main driver for the growth of several areas within knowledge representation and reasoning, fostering the exploitation in actual applications. In this document, we present the ASP-CORE-2 standard input language for Answer Set Programming, which has been adopted in ASP Compet... Standardization of solver input languages has been a main driver for the growth of several areas within knowledge representation and reasoning, fostering the exploitation in actual applications. In this document, we present the ASP-CORE-2 standard input language for Answer Set Programming, which has been adopted in ASP Competition events since 2013. read more read less
View PDF
322 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S1471068418000054
Multi-shot ASP solving with clingo
Martin Gebser, Roland Kaminski1, Benjamin Kaufmann1, Torsten Schaub1

Abstract:

We introduce a new flexible paradigm of grounding and solving in Answer Set Programming (ASP), which we refer to as multi-shot ASP solving, and present its implementation in the ASP system clingo. Multi-shot ASP solving features grounding and solving processes that deal with continuously changing logic programs. In doing so, ... We introduce a new flexible paradigm of grounding and solving in Answer Set Programming (ASP), which we refer to as multi-shot ASP solving, and present its implementation in the ASP system clingo. Multi-shot ASP solving features grounding and solving processes that deal with continuously changing logic programs. In doing so, they remain operative and accommodate changes in a seamless way. For instance, such processes allow for advanced forms of search, as in optimization or theory solving, or interaction with an environment, as in robotics or query answering. Common to them is that the problem specification evolves during the reasoning process, either because data or constraints are added, deleted, or replaced. This evolutionary aspect adds another dimension to ASP since it brings about state changing operations. We address this issue by providing an operational semantics that characterizes grounding and solving processes in multi-shot ASP solving. This characterization provides a semantic account of grounder and solver states along with the operations manipulating them. The operative nature of multi-shot solving avoids redundancies in relaunching grounder and solver programs and benefits from the solver's learning capacities. clingo accomplishes this by complementing ASP's declarative input language with control capacities. On the declarative side, a new directive allows for structuring logic programs into named and parameterizable subprograms. The grounding and integration of these subprograms into the solving process is completely modular and fully controllable from the procedural side. To this end, clingo offers a new application programming interface that is conveniently accessible via scripting languages. By strictly separating logic and control, clingo also abolishes the need for dedicated systems for incremental and reactive reasoning, like iclingo and oclingo, respectively, and its flexibility goes well beyond the advanced yet still rigid solving processes of the latter. read more read less
View PDF
316 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Theory and Practice of Logic Programming.

It automatically formats your research paper to Cambridge University Press formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Theory and Practice of Logic Programming format uses unsrt citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Theory and Practice of Logic Programming in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Theory and Practice of Logic Programming guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Theory and Practice of Logic Programming guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Theory and Practice of Logic Programming guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Theory and Practice of Logic Programming citation style.

4. Can I use the Theory and Practice of Logic Programming templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Theory and Practice of Logic Programming.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Theory and Practice of Logic Programming that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming.

7. Where can I find the template for the Theory and Practice of Logic Programming?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Theory and Practice of Logic Programming's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Theory and Practice of Logic Programming's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Theory and Practice of Logic Programming is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Theory and Practice of Logic Programming?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Theory and Practice of Logic Programming?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Theory and Practice of Logic Programming?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Theory and Practice of Logic Programming's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Theory and Practice of Logic Programming?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Theory and Practice of Logic Programming. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Theory and Practice of Logic Programming?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Theory and Practice of Logic Programming are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Theory and Practice of Logic Programming?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Theory and Practice of Logic Programming's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Theory and Practice of Logic Programming in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Theory and Practice of Logic Programming formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template