Scispace (Formerly Typeset)
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Component-Based Software Engineering
  4. 2006
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Component-Based Software Engineering
  4. 2006
Showing papers presented at "Component-Based Software Engineering in 2006"
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_27•
Dynamic reconfiguration and access to services in hierarchical component models

[...]

Petr Hnětynka1, Frantisek Plasil1•
Charles University in Prague1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors address the unavoidable problem of dynamic reconfiguration in component-based systems with a hierarchical component model and present a solution based on allowing several well defined patterns of dynamic re-figuration and introducing a utility interface concept, which allows using a service provided under the SOA paradigm.
Abstract: This paper addresses the unavoidable problem of dynamic reconfig-uration in component-based system with a hierarchical component model. The presented solution is based on (1) allowing several well defined patterns of dynamic reconfiguration and on (2) introducing a utility interface concept, which allows using a service provided under the SOA paradigm from a component-based system. The paper is based on our experience with non-trivial case studies written for component-based systems SOFA and Fractal.

65 citations

Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_9•
Designing software architectures with an aspect-oriented architecture description language

[...]

Jennifer Pérez1, Nour Ali1, José A. Carsí1, Isidro Ramos1•
Polytechnic University of Valencia1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an Aspect-Oriented Architecture Description Language (AOADL) to specify software architectures of complex, dynamic and distributed software systems, and demonstrate how PRISMA AOADL improves the management, maintainability and reusability of software architectures introducing the notion of aspect in its ADL.
Abstract: A great deal of languages have emerged and have demonstrated the advantages that Aspect-Oriented Programming offers. For this reason, the aspect-oriented approach is being introduced into the early phases (analysis and design) of the software life cycle. In this work, we present an Aspect-Oriented Architecture Description Language (AOADL) to specify software architectures of complex, dynamic and distributed software systems. This AOADL follows the PRISMA approach, which integrates the advantages of Component-Based Software Development (CBSD) and Aspect-Oriented Software Development (AOSD). The PRISMA AOADL combines components and aspects in an elegant and novel way achieving a better management of crosscutting-concerns. In addition, it is independent of the technology, and it has great expressive power in order to facilitate the automatic code generation from its specifications. In this work, we demonstrate how PRISMA AOADL improves the management, maintainability and reusability of software architectures introducing the notion of aspect in its ADL.

45 citations

Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_25•
A qos driven development process model for component-based software systems

[...]

Heiko Koziolek1, Jens Happe1•
University of Oldenburg1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: In this article, the authors extend an existing component-based development process model by Cheesman and Daniels to explicitly include early, model-based quality of service (QoS) analyses.
Abstract: Non-functional specifications of software components are considered an important asset in constructing dependable systems, since they enable early Quality of Service (QoS) evaluations. Several approaches for the QoS analysis of component-based software architectures have been introduced. However, most of these approaches do not consider the integration into the development process sufficiently. For example, they envision a pure bottom-up development or neglect that system architects do not have complete information for QoS analyses at their disposal. We extent an existing component-based development process model by Cheesman and Daniels to explicitly include early, model-based QoS analyses. Besides the system architect, we describe further involved roles. Exemplary for the performance domain, we analyse what information these roles can provide to construct a performance model of a software architecture.

42 citations

Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_31•
Virtualization of Service Gateways in Multi-provider Environments

[...]

Yvan Royon1, Stéphane Frénot1, Frédéric Le Mouël1•
Institut national des sciences Appliquées de Lyon1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: A multi-user, multi-service execution environment, which is a virtualized service gateway that isolates services from different providers, while still permitting on-demand collaboration, is defined.
Abstract: Today we see more and more services, such as entertainment or home automation, being brought to connected homes. These services are published and operated by a variety of service providers. Currently, each provider sells his own box, providing both connectivity and a closed service environment. The open service paradigm aims at mixing all services within the same box, thus opening the service delivery chain for home users. However, open service gateways still lack important mechanisms. Multiple service providers can access and use the same gateway concurrently. We must define what this use is, i.e. we must define a notion of user. Also, service providers should not interfere with each other on the gateway, except if explicitly required. In other words, we must isolate services from different providers, while still permitting on-demand collaboration. By combining all these mechanisms, we are defining a multi-user, multi-service execution environment, which we call a virtualized service gateway. We implement part of these features using OSGi technology.

40 citations

Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_8•
A symmetric and unified approach towards combining aspect-oriented and component-based software development

[...]

Davy Suvee1, Bruno De Fraine1, Wim Vanderperren1•
Vrije Universiteit Brussel1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: A novel component model is introduced that does not employ specialized aspect constructs for modularizing crosscutting concerns and an expressive configuration language is provided that allows to describe both regular and aspect-oriented interactions amongst components.
Abstract: In this paper, we propose a novel approach towards integrating the ideas behind Aspect-Oriented and Component-Based Software Development. Our approach aims at achieving a symmetric, unified component architecture that treats aspects and components as uniform entities. To this end, a novel component model is introduced that does not employ specialized aspect constructs for modularizing crosscutting concerns. Instead, an expressive configuration language is provided that allows to describe both regular and aspect-oriented interactions amongst components. This paper presents the ongoing FuseJ research, a first experiment for realizing this symmetric and unified aspect/component architecture.

38 citations

Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_28•
MADCAR: an abstract model for dynamic and automatic (re-)assembling of component-based applications

[...]

Guillaume Grondin1, Noury Bouraqadi1, Laurent Vercouter2•
École des Mines de Douai1, Mines ParisTech2
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: MaDcAr is introduced, an abstract model of dynamic automatic adaptation engines for (re-)assembling component-based software that aims at being a conceptual framework for developing customizable engines reusable in multiple applications and execution contexts.
Abstract: Dynamicity is an important requirement for critical software adaptation where a stop can be dangerous (e.g. for humans or environment) or costly (e.g. power plants or production lines). Adaptation at run-time is also required in context-aware applications where execution conditions often change. In this paper, we introduce MaDcAr, an abstract model of dynamic automatic adaptation engines for (re-)assembling component-based software. MaDcAr aims at being a conceptual framework for developing customizable engines reusable in multiple applications and execution contexts. Besides, MaDcAr provides a uniform solution for automating both the construction of application from scratch and the adaptation of existing component assemblies.

37 citations

Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_18•
A process for resolving performance trade-offs in component-based architectures

[...]

Egor Bondarev1, Michel R. V. Chaudron1•
Eindhoven University of Technology1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: Techniques that support the exploration of the quality properties of component-based architectures deployed on multiprocessor platforms are presented and special attention is paid to real-time properties and efficiency of resource use.
Abstract: Designing architectures requires the balancing of multiple system quality objectives. In this paper, we present techniques that support the exploration of the quality properties of component-based architectures deployed on multiprocessor platforms. Special attention is paid to real-time properties and efficiency of resource use. The main steps of the process are (1) a simple way of modelling properties of software and hardware components, (2) from the component properties, a model of an execution architecture is composed and analyzed for system-level quality attributes, (3) for the composed system, selected execution scenarios are evaluated, (4) Pareto curves are used for making design trade-offs explicit. The process has been applied to several industrial systems. A Car Radio Navigation system is used to illustrate the method. For this system, we consider architectural alternatives, show their specification, and present their trade-off with respect to cost, performance and robustness.

34 citations

Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_6•
From specification to experimentation: a software component search engine architecture

[...]

Vinicius Cardoso Garcia1, Daniel Lucrédio2, Frederico Araújo Durão1, Eduardo Cruz Reis Santos1, Eduardo Santana de Almeida1, Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes2, Silvio Romero de Lemos Meira1 •
Recife Center for Advanced Studies and Systems1, University of São Paulo2
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: This paper presents a software component search engine, from the early specification and design steps to two experiments performed to evaluate its performance, and points out possible improvements and future research directions.
Abstract: This paper presents a software component search engine, from the early specification and design steps to two experiments performed to evaluate its performance. After the experience gained from the use of this first version, several improvements were introduced. The current version of the engine combines text mining and facet-based search. The experiments indicated, so far, that using these two techniques together is better than using them separately. From the experience obtained in these experiments and in industrial tests, we point out possible improvements and future research directions, which are presented and discussed at the end of the paper.

33 citations

Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_21•
On-Demand quality-oriented assistance in component-based software evolution

[...]

Chouki Tibermacine1, Régis Fleurquin1, Salah Sadou1•
Sewanee: The University of the South1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: A solution that aims at assisting the software maintainer during an evolution activity on his demand, which requires the definition of a documentation during development, organized in the form of bindings between formal descriptions of architectural decisions and their targeted quality attributes.
Abstract: During an architectural evolution of a component-based software, certain quality attributes may be weakened. This is due to the lack of an explicit definition of the links between these non-functional characteristics and the architectural decisions implementing them. In this paper, we present a solution that aims at assisting the software maintainer during an evolution activity on his demand. It requires the definition of a documentation during development, organized in the form of bindings between formal descriptions of architectural decisions and their targeted quality attributes. Through an assistance algorithm, the approach uses this documentation in order to notify the maintainer of the possible effects of architectural changes on quality requirements. We also present a prototype tool which automates our proposals. This tool and the overall approach has been experienced on a real-world software in order to validate them.

24 citations

Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_10•
A component model engineered with components and aspects

[...]

Lionel Seinturier1, Nicolas Pessemier1, Laurence Duchien1, Thierry Coupaye2•
French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation1, Orange S.A.2
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: AOKell as discussed by the authors is a reflective component framework where application components are managed by other, so-called, control components and where aspects glue together application components and control components, and the originality of AOKell is to provide an aspect-oriented approach to integrate these two dimensions.
Abstract: This paper presents AOKell, a framework for engineering component-based systems This framework implements the Fractal model, a hierarchical and dynamic component model The novelty of this paper lies in the presentation of AOKell, an implementation of the Fractal model with aspects Two dimensions can be isolated with Fractal: the functional dimension, which is concerned with the definition of application components, and the control dimension, which is concerned with the technical services (eg lifecycle, binding, persistence, etc) that manage components The originality of AOKell is, first, to provide an aspect-oriented approach to integrate these two dimensions, and second, to apply a component-based approach for engineering the control dimension Hence, AOKell is a reflective component framework where application components are managed by other, so-called, control components and where aspects glue together application components and control components

22 citations

Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_1•
Defining and checking deployment contracts for software components

[...]

Kung-Kiu Lau1, Vladyslav Ukis1•
University of Manchester1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: This paper presents an approach to component deployment which not only defines better deployment contracts but also checks them in the deployment phase.
Abstract: Ideally in the deployment phase, components should be composable, and their composition checked. Current component models fall short of this ideal. Most models do not allow composition in the deployment phase. Moreover, current models use only deployment descriptors as deployment contracts. These descriptors are not ideal contracts. For one thing, they are only for specific containers, rather than arbitrary execution environments. In any case, they are checked only at runtime, not deployment time. In this paper we present an approach to component deployment which not only defines better deployment contracts but also checks them in the deployment phase.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_5•
Multi criteria selection of components using the analytic hierarchy process

[...]

João W. Cangussu1, Kendra C. Cooper1, Eric Wong1•
University of Texas at Dallas1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: An empirical study using AHP to rank components for data compression, which provides a clear indication that AHP is appropriate for the task of selecting components when several criteria must be considered.
Abstract: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been successfully used in the past for the selection of components, as presented in case studies in the literature. In this paper, an empirical study using AHP to rank components is presented. The components used in the study are for data compression; each implements one of the Arithmetic Encoding (AREC), Huffman coding (HUFF), Burrows-Wheeler Transform (BWT), Fractal Image Encoding (FRAC), and Embedded Zero-Tree Wavelet Encoder (EZW) algorithms. The ranking is a semi-automated approach that is based on using rigorously collected data for the components' behavior; selection criteria include maximum memory usage, total response time, and security properties (e.g., data integrity). The results provide a clear indication that AHP is appropriate for the task of selecting components when several criteria must be considered. Though the study is limited to select components based on multiple non-functional criteria, the approach can be expanded to include multiple functional criteria.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_7•
Architectural building blocks for plug-and-play system design

[...]

Shangzhu Wang1, George S. Avrunin1, Lori A. Clarke1•
University of Massachusetts Amherst1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: This paper proposes a component-based specification approach that allows designers to experiment with alternative interaction semantics and is also integrated with design-time verification to provide feedback about the correctness of the overall system design.
Abstract: One of the distinguishing features of distributed systems is the importance of the interaction mechanisms that are used to define how the sequential components interact with each other. Given the complexity of the behavior that is being described and the large design space of various alternatives, choosing appropriate interaction mechanisms is difficult. In this paper, we propose a component-based specification approach that allows designers to experiment with alternative interaction semantics. Our approach is also integrated with design-time verification to provide feedback about the correctness of the overall system design. In this approach, connectors representing specific interaction semantics are composed from reusable building blocks. Standard communication interfaces for components are defined to reduce the impact of changing interactions on components' computations. The increased reusability of both components and connectors also allows savings at model-construction time for finite-state verification.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_15•
A formal component framework for distributed embedded systems

[...]

Christo Angelov1, Krzysztof Sierszecki1, Nicolae Marian1, Jinpeng Ma1•
University of Southern Denmark1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: This paper presents a formal specification of the COMDES framework, focusing on the main architectural issues and the specific line of reasoning that was followed while developing a hierarchy of executable models describing relevant aspects of system structure and behaviour.
Abstract: The widespread use of embedded systems mandates the development of industrial software design methods based on formal models (frameworks) and prefabricated components. This paper presents a formal specification of the COMDES framework, focusing on the main architectural issues and the specific line of reasoning that was followed while developing a hierarchy of executable models describing relevant aspects of system structure and behaviour. The above framework has been used to systematically define a hierarchy of reusable and reconfigurable components – simple and composite function blocks, reconfigurable state machines and function units – implementing the executable models presented in the paper.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_30•
Towards encapsulating data in component-based software systems

[...]

Kung-Kiu Lau1, Faris M. Taweel1•
University of Manchester1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: This paper proposes an approach for encapsulating data by separating it from control and computation in component models, which are tightly coupled, making reasoning difficult.
Abstract: A component-based system consists of components linked by connectors. Data can reside in components and/or in external data stores. Operations on data, such as access, update and transfer are carried out during computations performed by components. Typically, in current component models, control, computation and data are mixed up in the components, while control and data are both communicated by the connectors. As a result, such systems are tightly coupled, making reasoning difficult. In this paper we propose an approach for encapsulating data by separating it from control and computation.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_17•
Service policy enhancements for the OSGi service platform

[...]

Nico Goeminne1, Gregory De Jans1, Filip De Turck1, Bart Dhoedt1, Frank Gielen1 •
Ghent University1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: Two approaches are presented for enhancing the OSGi Service Platform with policies; the first approach extends the platform while the second one adapts the plug-in components.
Abstract: New content and service providers emerge every day. Each player offers new software components or services to support their technology. In these multi-vendor environments there is a genuine need for integration and interoperability. Integration and interoperability is a first step, once this is achieved components can seamlessly use services from different providers, and that is when service policies come into play. A policy mechanism allows fine grained control over the service usage. The OSGi Service Platform allows seamless integration of components and services but lacks a well defined mechanism for dynamic service policy management. Two approaches are presented for enhancing the OSGi Service Platform with policies. The first approach extends the platform while the second one adapts the plug-in components. Finally they are compared and evaluated against multiple requirements; usability, performance, transparency and backward compatibility.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_11•
CBSE in small and medium-sized enterprise: experience report

[...]

Reda Kadri, François Merciol1, Salah Sadou1•
Sewanee: The University of the South1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an experiment carried out in using CBSE within the framework of a partnership between a small and medium-sized enterprise and an academic research team, by hoping that this would be an answer to the above questions.
Abstract: Although the CBSE has a great success in software engineering, only large scale companies use it through their research and development department. Small and medium size enterprises still have some hesitations that deprives them of the various advantages offered by CBSE. This is mainly due to the economic constraints that large companies don't have. How can we make them benefit from this technology? Do they have to develop their own models? Should they obtain a modified version of this technology? What will happen to the code that already exists? What are the costs of such migration? How to proceed? In this paper we present an experiment carried out in using CBSE within the framework of a partnership between a small and medium-sized enterprise and an academic research team. We present the results and the way in which this migration has been performed, by hoping that this would be an answer to the above questions.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_3•
Behavioral compatibility without state explosion: design and verification of a component-based elevator control system

[...]

Paul C. Attie1, David H. Lorenz2, Aleksandra Portnova3, Hana Chockler•
American University of Beirut1, University of Virginia2, Northeastern University3
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a method for designing component-based systems and verifying their behavioral compatibility and temporal behavior that is not susceptible to state explosion, which is mostly automatic, with little manual deduction required, and does not analyze a large system of connected components at once, but instead analyzes components two at-a-time.
Abstract: Most methods for designing component-based systems and verifying their compatibility address only the syntactic compatibility of components; no analysis of run-time behavior is made. Those methods that do address run-time behavior suffer from state-explosion: the exponential increase of the number of global states, and hence the complexity of the analysis, with the number of components. We present a method for designing component-based systems and verifying their behavioral compatibility and temporal behavior that is not susceptible to state explosion. Our method is mostly automatic, with little manual deduction required, and does not analyze a large system of connected components at once, but instead analyzes components two-at-a-time. This pair-wise approach enables the automatic verification of temporal behavior, using model-checking, in time polynomial in the number and size of all components. Our method checks that behavior of a pair of interacting components conforms to given properties, specified in temporal logic. Interaction of the components is captured in a product of their behavioral automata, which are provided as a part of each component's interface. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method by applying it to the design and verification of a component-based elevator control algorithm.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_2•
GLoo: a framework for modeling and reasoning about component-oriented language abstractions

[...]

Markus Lumpe1•
Iowa State University1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: This paper presents GLoo, a framework for modeling and reasoning about open-ended language mechanisms for object- and component-oriented software development, and presents an encoding of the traits concept as an example of how to add support for a new and readily available language abstraction to the GLoo framework.
Abstract: The most important contribution to the success or failure of a software project comes from the choice of the programming languages being used and their support in the target environment. The choice of a suitable implementation language is not a guarantor for success, but an unsuitable language may result in a long, error-prone, and costly implementation, often resulting in an unstable product. In this paper, we present GLoo, a framework for modeling and reasoning about open-ended language mechanisms for object- and component-oriented software development. At the heart of GLoo is a small dynamic composition language that provides abstractions to (i) define and/or import reusable software components, (ii) introduce new compositional language abstractions, and (iii) build executable and reusable component-oriented specifications. To demonstrate its flexibility and extensibility, we then present an encoding of the traits concept as an example of how to add support for a new and readily available language abstraction to the GLoo framework.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_23•
Defining “predictable assembly”

[...]

Dick Hamlet1•
Portland State University1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: Predictable assembly in component-based software development intuitively means the ability to predict effectively properties of a system, making essential use of properties of its components as discussed by the authors, but it is difficult to give a formal definition, because the idea is a large, vague one.
Abstract: Predictable assembly in component-based software development intuitively means the ability to predict effectively properties of a system, making essential use of properties of its components. A formal definition is difficult to give, because the idea is a large, vague one. As an outgrowth of an informal workshop, this paper frames a mathematical definition. A somewhat surprising consequence of the formal definition is that assembly is usually predictable, but each particular case requires engineering effort to establish.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_26•
An enhanced composition model for conversational enterprise javabeans

[...]

Franck Barbier
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: This paper proposes and describes an appropriate Java library in order to increase the composition power of EJBs and includes a support for a broadcast communication mode which is, a priori, incompatible with non reentrance, a key characteristic of EjBs.
Abstract: When designing applications with Enterprise JavaBeans (EJBs) and more specifically with Stateful Session Beans, a major difficulty (or even an impossibility) is being able to properly transform business models and more precisely UML 2 models, into such component types, while including the expression of their mutual compositions. This contradicts with the spirit of the emerging Model-Driven Architecture (MDA) software engineering paradigm based on the definition of seamless model transformations. In this scope, this paper proposes and describes an appropriate Java library in order to increase the composition power of EJBs. The proposition includes a support for a broadcast communication mode (assimilated to “horizontal composition” in the paper) which is, a priori, incompatible with non reentrance, a key characteristic of EJBs. Besides, “vertical composition” is the counterpart of “horizontal compo-sition”. “Vertical composition” enables the consistent hierarchical combination of composite behaviors and compound behaviors, both being specified and implemented by means of UML 2 State Machine Diagrams.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_29•
Adaptation of monolithic software components by their transformation into composite configurations based on refactoring

[...]

Gautier Bastide1, Abdelhak Seriai1, Mourad Oussalah2•
École des Mines de Douai1, University of Nantes2
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: In this article, an approach aiming at adapting component structures instead of adapting component services is presented, which focuses on transforming a software component from a monolithic configuration to a composite one.
Abstract: We present in this paper an approach aiming at adapting component structures instead of adapting component services. It focuses on transforming a software component from a monolithic configuration to a composite one. Among the motivations of this kind of adaptation, we note its possible application to permit flexible deployment of software components and flexible loading of component service-code according to the available resources (CPU, memory). This adaptation is based on the analysis and the instrumentation of component codes.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_22•
Components have test buddies

[...]

Pankaj Jalote1, Rajesh Munshi1, Todd Probsting1•
Microsoft1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors study the role of testing of other components in finding defects in a component by analyzing defect data of an earlier version of Windows, and show that testing of the other components often is the largest source of defect detection.
Abstract: Most large software systems are architected as component-based systems. In such systems, components are developed and tested separately. As components cooperate for providing services, testing of a component also reveals defects in other components. In this paper we study the role testing of other components plays in finding defects in a component by analyzing defect data of an earlier version of Windows. Our analysis shows that testing of other components often is the largest source of finding defects in a component. The analysis also shows that though many components reveal defects in a component, often a small set of components – the Test Buddies – exists whose testing reveals the vast majority of the defects found by testing other components. The Test Buddies of a component are those with a heavy interaction with the component and represent the high priority customers for testing. The Test Buddy information for a system can be determined by the test data of an earlier release, and then can be used in different ways to improve the testing.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_4•
Verification of component-based software application families

[...]

Fei Xie1, James C. Browne2•
Portland State University1, University of Texas at Austin2
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an approach which facilitates formal verification of component-based software application families using model checking, which enables effective compositional reasoning by facilitating formulation of component properties and their environment assumptions.
Abstract: We present a novel approach which facilitates formal verification of component-based software application families using model checking. This approach enables effective compositional reasoning by facilitating formulation of component properties and their environment assumptions. This approach integrates bottom-up component verification and top-down system verification based on the concept of application family architectures (AFA). The core elements of an AFA are architectural styles and reusable components. Reusable components of a family are defined in the context of its architectural styles and their correctness properties are verified in bottom-up component compositions. Top-down system verification utilizes architectural styles to guide decomposition of properties of a system into properties of its components and formulation of assumptions for the component properties. The component properties are reused if already verified; otherwise, they are verified top-down recursively. Architectural style guided property decomposition facilitates reuse of verified component properties. Preliminary case studies have shown that our approach achieves order-of-magnitude reduction on verification complexities and realizes major verification reuse.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_24•
A tool to generate an adapter for the integration of web services interface

[...]

Kwangyong Lee1, Juil Kim2, Woojin Lee2, Kiwon Chong2•
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute1, Soongsil University2
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: The concept of the adapter for the integration of web services interface, the architecture of the tool, the process, and the algorithm to generate an adapter are described, which will help developers integrate several web services when they develop applications.
Abstract: As the number of available web services is steadily increasing, many applications are being developed by reusing web services. Accordingly, a tool to generate an adapter which integrates interfaces of several web services is proposed in this paper. The concept of the adapter for the integration of web services interface is described. The purpose of the adapter is to help developers use several web services with little effort for their application development. Then, implementation of the tool to generate an adapter is presented. The architecture of the tool, the process, and the algorithm to generate an adapter are described. The tool will help developers integrate several web services when they develop applications.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_20•
Impact of virtual memory managers on performance of J2EE applications

[...]

Alexander Ufimtsev1, Alena Kucharenka1, Liam Murphy1•
University College Dublin1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the impact of operating system's Virtual Memory Managers (VMMs) on performance of enterprise applications by taking various popular branches of the Linux kernel and modifying their VMM settings, one can see the effects it introduces on ECPerf J2EE Benchmark.
Abstract: We investigate the impact of Operating System's Virtual Memory Managers (VMMs) on performance of enterprise applications. By taking various popular branches of the Linux kernel and modifying their VMM settings, one can see the effects it introduces on ECPerf J2EE Benchmark. JBoss application server is used to run ECPerf. Our tests show that even the change of one parameter in VMM can have significant performance impacts. Performance of various kernel branches is compared. Parameter sensitivity and influence of specific settings are presented.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_13•
Generic component lookup

[...]

Till G. Bay1, Patrick Eugster2, Manuel Oriol1•
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne1, Purdue University2
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a generic model of component lookup, applicable to settings as diverse as tagged sets, classic white pages, or even method dispatch, and illustrate their model through various examples of existing lookup schemes.
Abstract: The possibilities currently offered to conduct business at an electronic level are immense. Service providers offer access to their attendances through components placed on the Internet; such components can be combined to build applications, which can themselves be used as components by further business units. The final leg of the way to this paradigm has been paved by the advent of service-oriented architectures in general, and Web Services in particular. With protocols existing for any parties to communicate, the most critical ingredient to the success of a business idea remains the task of choosing one's business partners. At a technical level, this translates to the issue of identifying which components represent the most adequate services to build a final application. While each middleware technology and system proposed in the past has been described with its scheme for “looking up” components, this paper chooses the more difficult approach of trying to distill the fundamentals of component lookup. We propose a generic model of component lookup — applicable to settings as diverse as tagged sets, classic white pages, or even method dispatch — and its implementation. We illustrate our model through various examples of existing lookup schemes. It turns out that in our generic context the common distinction between name-based and type-based lookup becomes rather artificial.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_16•
A prototype tool for software component services in embedded real-time systems

[...]

Frank Lüders1, Daniel Flemström1, Anders Wall, Ivica Crnkovic1•
Mälardalen University College1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: In this paper, a component model based on binary components and targeting the broader domain of embedded real-time systems has been proposed, inspired by component models for the desktop and information systems domains in the sense that a basic component model is extended with a set of services.
Abstract: The use of software component models has become popular during the last decade, in particular in the development of software for desktop applications and distributed information systems. However, such models have not been widely used in the domain of embedded real-time systems. There is a considerable amount of research on component models for embedded real-time systems, or even narrower application domains, which focuses on source code components and statically configured systems. This paper explores an alternative approach by laying the groundwork for a component model based on binary components and targeting the broader domain of embedded real-time systems. The work is inspired by component models for the desktop and information systems domains in the sense that a basic component model is extended with a set of services for the targeted application domain. A prototype tool for supporting these services is presented and its use illustrated by a control application.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_12•
Supervising distributed black boxes

[...]

Philippe Mauran, Gérard Padiou, Xuan Loc Pham Thi1•
College of Information Technology1
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: A supervision service fitted for software components is introduced, proposing an instrumentation protocol that keeps the opacity of components, with respect to their implementation, whilst it allows to instrument components independently from their design.
Abstract: Software components bring in an interesting alternative to the traditional, centralized, approach to software development. The core idea is indeed to enable the (end) user to build and customize his own application, by assembling pre-existing (“off the shelf”) components. However, picking predefined, off-the-shelf components raises the question of the suitability of these components to a peculiar use. In this setting, the ability to supervise and adapt components appears to be crucial, in order to make the component-oriented approach to software design really effective. The fact that a component is and must remain a black box for its clients makes a significant difference as regards instrumentation, and thus supervision of components. This paper introduces a supervision service fitted for software components. The main features of this service are that: –it proposes an instrumentation protocol that keeps the opacity of components, with respect to their implementation, whilst it allows to instrument components independently from their design. – it facilitates the supervision of components by providing a simple coupling between the component's internal control, and the control provided by the user of the component, based on user-specified criteria. This paper motivates the interest of such a supervision service, outlines its implementation, and illustrates its use.
Book Chapter•10.1007/11783565_19•
A model transformation approach for the early performance and reliability analysis of component-based systems

[...]

Vincenzo Grassi1, Raffaela Mirandola2, Antonino Sabetta1•
University of Rome Tor Vergata1, Polytechnic University of Milan2
29 Jun 2006
TL;DR: A model-based approach is proposed whose goal is to support the derivation of sufficiently detailed prediction models from high level models of component-based systems, focusing on the prediction of performance and reliability.
Abstract: The adoption of a “high level” perspective in the design of a component-based application, without considering the specific features of some underlying supporting platform, has the advantage of focusingon the relevant architectural aspects and reasoning about them in a platform independent way, omitting unnecessary details that could even not be known at the earliest development stages.On the other hand, many of the details that are typically neglected in this high-level perspective must necessarily be taken into account to obtain a meaningful evaluation of different architectural choices in terms of extra-functional quality attributes, like performance or reliability. Toward the reconciliation of these two contrasting needs, we propose a model-based approach whose goal is to support the derivation of sufficiently detailed prediction models from high level models of component-based systems, focusing on the prediction of performance and reliability. We exploit for this purpose a refinement mechanism based on the use of model transformation techniques.

Tools

SciSpace AgentBiomedical AgentSciSpace RecruitSciSpace for EnterpriseAgent GalleryChat with PDFLiterature ReviewAI WriterFind TopicsParaphraserCitation GeneratorExtract DataAI DetectorCitation Booster

Learn

ResourcesLive Workshops

SciSpace

CareersSupportBrowse PapersPricingSciSpace Affiliate ProgramCancellation & Refund PolicyTermsPrivacyData Sources

Directories

PapersTopicsJournalsAuthorsConferencesInstitutionsCitation StylesWriting templates

Extension & Apps

SciSpace Chrome ExtensionSciSpace Mobile App

Contact

support@scispace.com
SciSpace

© 2026 | PubGenius Inc. | Suite # 217 691 S Milpitas Blvd Milpitas CA 95035, USA

soc2
Secured by Delve