Valerie J. Karplus
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
116 Papers
334 Citations
Valerie J. Karplus is an academic researcher from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computable general equilibrium & Emissions trading. The author has an hindex of 27, co-authored 97 publications. Previous affiliations of Valerie J. Karplus include Carnegie Mellon University & Tsinghua University.
Chat about Author
Papers
•Journal Article
Equity and emissions trading in China
TL;DR: This paper analyzed the distributional aspects of a Chinese emissions-trading scheme from ethical, economic, and stated-preference perspectives, and conducted a survey among Chinese climate-policy experts on the basis of the simulated model impacts.
5
Expanding international GHG emissions trading: The role of Chinese and U.S. participation
Tianyu Qi,Niven Winchester,Valerie J. Karplus,Xiliang Zhang +3 more
- 15 Apr 2013
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider the implications of expanding these linkages further to include China and (or) the United States, and analyse the individual and combined impact of including China and US in an integrated global emissions trading market.
Innovating Up, Down, and Sideways: The (Unlikely) Institutional Origins of Experimentation in China's Plug-in Electric Vehicle Industry
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present evidence that independent domestic Chinese firms, those with no historic partnerships with international joint venture firms, are undertaking a surprising diversity of innovation in China's plug-in electric vehicle sector.
5
Expert elicitation of the timing and uncertainty to establish a geologic sequestration well for CO2 in the United States.
Emily J Moore,Valerie J. Karplus,M. G. Morgan +2 more
TL;DR: Estimated time to establish a geologic sequestration well for CO2 in the U.S. is between 5.5 and 9.6 years, with an upper bound of 12 years.
4
Institutions and Emissions Trading in China
Valerie J. Karplus
- 01 May 2018
TL;DR: The authors examines interactions between state control and an emissions trading system and identifies a tension in its design in China: state-controlled firms most likely to comply with the system may operate in the least market-oriented settings.