Tina Managhan
Oxford Brookes University
8 Papers
46 Citations
Tina Managhan is an academic researcher from Oxford Brookes University. The author has contributed to research in topics: International relations & The Imaginary. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 6 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
Highways, heroes, and secular martyrs: the symbolics of power and sacrifice
TL;DR: The authors examines the subtle and not so subtle shifts in Canadian political culture that have taken place in, through and alongside the so-called return of the Canadian warrior, arguing that the sacralisation of violence which has refound this political community has been enabled by a remasculinised aesthetic that delimits the progressive liberalism which animated the Canada of old.
30
•Book
Gender, Agency and War: The Maternalized Body in US Foreign Policy
Tina Managhan
- 26 Jan 2012
TL;DR: The Vicissitudes of Life: Women's Complex Entanglement with Peace and War as mentioned in this paper is a seminal work on reading international relations through bodies, reading the maternal body as political event, and understanding the centrality of the Maternal Body to sovereign representation.
19
Shifting the gaze from hysterical mothers to ‘deadly dads’: spectacle and the anti-nuclear movement
TL;DR: This article used the trope of "hysterical motherhood" to elucidate one of the unique forms that women's protest action took at the height of the American anti-nuclear movement, arguing that its tactical effectiveness lay in its ability to redirect the societal gaze from the 'hystericized' bodies of women to the bodies and practices of militarised men.
8
We all dreamed it: the politics of knowing and un-knowing the “war on terror”
TL;DR: In this article, Baudrillard's particular quote is introduced to raise questions about the politics of knowing and un-knowing in International Relations, with specific reference to risk and the "war on terror".
Unknowing the “War on Terror” : The Pleasures of Risk
Tina Managhan
- 14 Feb 2020
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate the order of things that has made this war intelligible in both mainstream and critical approaches to Security Studies and International Relations, and bring to light and theorize the obscene pleasures of the "War on Terror" and its supplementary precautionary risk logic.
3