T.D. Howell
IBM
26 Papers
752 Citations
T.D. Howell is an academic researcher from IBM. The author has contributed to research in topics: Signal & Communication channel. The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 26 publications. Previous affiliations of T.D. Howell include Quantum Corporation & University of California, Berkeley.
Chat about Author
Papers
Identification of nonlinear write effects using pseudorandom sequences
TL;DR: A technique is described which is easily applied, clearly separates linear from nonlinear effects, can be related to the underlying physical processes, and provides a good basis for modeling the channel.
214
Error rate performance of experimental gigabit per square inch recording components
TL;DR: In this article, the authors measured the on-track and off-track error-rate performance of several combinations of experimental heads and disks using a partial-response channel at approximately 1 Gb/in/sup 2.
149
Patent
Decoding the output signal of a partial-response class-IV communication or recording device channel
Francois Dolivo,Gottfried Ungerboeck,T.D. Howell +2 more
- 15 Oct 1985
TL;DR: In this paper, a maximum-likelihood sequence decoder is used with a partial-response signaling system for processing sequences of sampled values from a communication channel or recording device, which can be duobinary, dicode, or partial response class-IV.
76
Patent
Method and apparatus for decoding the output signal of a partial-response communication or recording-device channel
Francois Dolivo,Gottfried Ungerboeck,T.D. Howell +2 more
- 11 Jul 1984
TL;DR: In this paper, a maximum-likelihood sequence decoder is used with a partial-response signaling system for processing sequences of sampled values from a communication channel or recording device, which can be duobinary, dicode, or partial response class-IV.
62
Global properties of tensor rank
TL;DR: The dependence of tensor rank on the underlying ring of scalars is considered in this paper, where it is shown that the integers are, in a certain sense, the worst scalars.
48