Steve Williams
Texas Southern University
19 Papers
211 Citations
Steve Williams is an academic researcher from Texas Southern University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Risk perception & Affect (psychology). The author has an hindex of 12, co-authored 19 publications. Previous affiliations of Steve Williams include National University of Singapore & University of Arkansas – Fort Smith.
Chat about Author
Papers
Mood and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Effects of Positive Affect on Employee Organizational Citizenship Behavior Intentions
Steve Williams,Wong Tze Shiaw +1 more
TL;DR: It is revealed that the amount of positive affect currently experienced by an employee significantly influenced the employee's intention to perform specific acts of organizational citizenship.
295
Justice and organizational citizenship behavior intentions: Fair rewards versus fair treatment.
TL;DR: In a sample of 114 employees from various industries, organizations, and positions, the likelihood of organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB) increased when employee perceptions of fair treatment by supervisors became more positive.
250
Affective influences on risk perceptions and risk intention
TL;DR: The effects of affect, as measured by the dispositional traits of positive affectivity and negative affectivity (NA), on risk perceptions and risk intentions were tested among 149 managers from a variety of industries and companies as mentioned in this paper.
75
The Effects of Mood on Managerial Risk Perceptions: Exploring Affect and the Dimensions of Risk
TL;DR: Positive affect increased the likelihood that people who perceived situations as risky would select riskier courses of action, and their beliefs that they could influence risky outcomes increased.
72
Type A behavior pattern and escalating commitment.
John Schaubroeck,Steve Williams +1 more
TL;DR: Global Type A behavior pattern and the underlying dimension of achievement strivings were positively related to the desire to continue the same course of action in the high prior-responsibility condition but not in the low prior- Responsibility condition.
65