Staffan I. Lindberg
University of Gothenburg
191 Papers
890 Citations
Staffan I. Lindberg is an academic researcher from University of Gothenburg. The author has contributed to research in topics: Democracy & Democratization. The author has an hindex of 40, co-authored 181 publications. Previous affiliations of Staffan I. Lindberg include Kent State University & Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Chat about Author
Papers
A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it?
TL;DR: A third wave of autocratization is manifestukuyama and others declared liberal democracy's eternal dominance, less than 30 years after Fukuyama et al..
949
Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach
Michael Coppedge,Michael Coppedge,John Gerring,David Altman,Michael Bernhard,M. Steven Fish,Allen Hicken,Matthew Kroenig,Staffan I. Lindberg,Kelly M. McMann,Pamela Paxton,Holli A. Semetko,Svend-Erik Skaaning,Jeffrey K. Staton,Jan Teorell +14 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue for an approach to conceptualize and measure regimes such that meaningful comparisons can be made through time and across countries, and review some of the payoffs such an approach might bring to the study of democracy.
•Book
Democracy and Elections in Africa
Staffan I. Lindberg
- 01 Aug 2006
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an overview of elections in Africa, by Year Appendix 1: Overview of Elections in Africa by year Appendix 2: Changes in Civil Liberties Rankings Appendix 3: About the Freedom House Civil Liberties Index Appendix 4: A Data Set on Elections in Sub-Saharan Africa Notes References Index
562
Regimes of the World (RoW): Opening New Avenues for the Comparative Study of Political Regimes
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a regime typology that distinguishes cases classified with a high degree of certainty from those with "upper" and "lower" bounds in each category.
Are African Voters Really Ethnic or Clientelistic? Survey Evidence from Ghana
TL;DR: The extent to which elections fulfill that mission is to a signifi cant extent dependent on citizens' rationale for how they behave at the polls as discussed by the authors, which is the core institution of modern liberal democracy whereby the right of the people to self-government can be exercised is competitive and participa tory elections.
417