Sofie Sebuødegård
University of Washington
35 Papers
92 Citations
Sofie Sebuødegård is an academic researcher from University of Washington. The author has contributed to research in topics: Breast cancer screening & Mammography. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 35 publications. Previous affiliations of Sofie Sebuødegård include Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences.
Chat about Author
Papers
Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Per Skaane,Andriy I. Bandos,Loren T. Niklason,Sofie Sebuødegård,Bjørn Helge Østerås,Randi Gullien,David Gur,Solveig Hofvind +7 more
TL;DR: Addition of digital breast tomosynthesis to digital mammography resulted in significant gains in sensitivity and specificity, and Synthetic mammography in combination with digital breastTomosynthesis had similar sensitivity and Specificity to digital Mammography in conjunction with computer-aided detection.
153
Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Per Skaane,Sofie Sebuødegård,Andriy I. Bandos,David Gur,Bjørn Helge Østerås,Randi Gullien,Solveig Hofvind +6 more
TL;DR: DBT-supplemented screening resulted in significant increases in screen-detected cancers and specificity, however, no significant change was observed in the rate, size, node status, or grade of interval cancers.
119
Women treated with breast conserving surgery do better than those with mastectomy independent of detection mode, prognostic and predictive tumor characteristics
TL;DR: Women treated with BCT have significantly better breast cancer-specific survival and a lower risk of dying from breast cancer compared to women treated with mastectomy, independent of detection mode, prognostic and predictive tumor characteristic.
114
Mammographic Performance in a Population-based Screening Program: Before, during, and after the Transition from Screen-Film to Full-Field Digital Mammography
Solveig Hofvind,Per Skaane,Joann G. Elmore,Sofie Sebuødegård,Solveig Roth Hoff,Christoph I. Lee +5 more
TL;DR: After the initial transitional phase from SFM to FFDM, population-based screening with FFDM is associated with less harm because of lower recall and biopsy rates and higher positive predictive values after biopsy than screening with SFM.
Mode of detection: an independent prognostic factor for women with breast cancer.
TL;DR: Investigating breast cancer survival and risk of breast cancer death by detection mode (screen-detected, interval, and detected outside the screening programme), adjusting for prognostic and predictive tumour characteristics found detection mode is an independent prognostic factor for women diagnosed with breast cancer.
35