Slavko Gajevic

TL;DR: This paper examined media coverage of animal-human hybrid embryos in the context of a highly efficient public relations campaign by a coalition of scientists and scientific organisations in the United Kingdom, and argued that while science communicators won a convincing media victory, the broad (and unintended) effects of such campaigns highlight concerns about media independence, and the openness and quality of public and scientific debate about controversial science.

TL;DR: The authors examines the media debates around animal-human admixed embryos as a struggle for favorable coverage between different groups of news sources, and offers insights into the quiet tactical work of media management that usually underpins such struggles.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a model for the analysis of a journalistic argument, based on Van Dijk's model of editorials and the model of argument developed by Toulmin, which is applied to editorials on the Yugoslav conflicts of the 1990s published by two newspapers, the American The New York Times and the Serbian Politika.

TL;DR: This paper analyzed how newspaper editorials on the Yugoslav conflicts of the 1990s contributed to the modern understanding of the transnational community, and found that journalists, in their coverage on armed conflicts, conceptualized the Transnational community primarily as a discursive community.