Safi Shams
University of Massachusetts Amherst
6 Papers
7 Citations
Safi Shams is an academic researcher from University of Massachusetts Amherst. The author has contributed to research in topics: Sociology of culture & Agency (sociology). The author has an hindex of 2, co-authored 6 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
Racial and gender trends and trajectories in access to managerial jobs.
TL;DR: It is shown that trajectories of managerial representation for each status group are much more complex than the common deductive approach leads us to believe, and the importance of interaction and contingency in the production of inequalities is underscore.
12
Book Review: The Explanation of Social Action by John Levi Martin:
TL;DR: In this paper, Backhouse argues that economic policies based on implications of models that are knowingly built with unrealistic assumptions or worse ideologically friendly assumption creates myths and it is difficult to see how economics could ever be truly scientific if economists insist on maintaining such myths.
2
Book Review: Luc Boltanski, Mysteries and Conspiracies: Detective Stories, Spy Novels and the Making of Modern Societies
TL;DR: The Ashgate Research Companion to Memory Studies as discussed by the authors is a welcome addition to the literature on memory studies, cultural studies, and cultural and global sociology, and it is a significant contribution to the burgeoning body of work that recognizes subjectivities and positionalities in memory research.
2
A genealogy of moral character: The cultural constitution of contention in Lowell, MA 1825–1845
TL;DR: This paper investigated the role of culture in the formation of the antagonism at the basis of contention and argued that the formation is an event at the level of meaning that establishes the moral disunity elementary to contentious claim-making.
2
The Governance of Economies and the Economics of Governance
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an overview of Roberts's arguments in The Logic of Discipline and argue that only in understanding the interactive force of the two can a systemic analysis of capitalism hope to be plausible.
1