S Hendriks
National Institutes of Health
28 Papers
94 Citations
S Hendriks is an academic researcher from National Institutes of Health. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Clinical trial. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 21 publications. Previous affiliations of S Hendriks include University of Amsterdam.
Chat about Author
Papers
Artificial gametes: a systematic review of biological progress towards clinical application
TL;DR: A systematic review of the literature indicated that in animals live births have already been achieved using artificial gametes of varying (cell type) sources and in humans, normal developmental potential, epigenetic and genetic stability and birth of children has not been reported following the use of human artificialgametes.
104
Ethical Challenges of Risk, Informed Consent, and Posttrial Responsibilities in Human Research with Neural Devices: A Review
S Hendriks,Christine Grady,Khara M. Ramos,Winston Chiong,Joseph J. Fins,Paul J. Ford,Sara Goering,Henry T. Greely,Katrina Hutchison,Katrina Hutchison,Michael L. Kelly,Scott Y. H. Kim,Eran Klein,Eran Klein,Sarah H. Lisanby,Helen S. Mayberg,Hannah Maslen,Franklin G. Miller,Karen S. Rommelfanger,Sameer A. Sheth,Anna Wexler +20 more
TL;DR: This article draws on, reviews, specifies, and interprets existing ethical frameworks, literature, and subject matter expertise to address 3 specific ethical challenges in neural devices research: analysis of risk, informed consent, and posttrial responsibilities to research participants.
80
Potential consequences of clinical application of artificial gametes: a systematic review of stakeholder views
TL;DR: Of course, clinical introduction of artificial gametes should only be considered on the basis of reassuring outcomes of appropriate preclinical effectiveness and safety studies, but as clinical application of these new technologies may have wider societal consequences, a proactive consideration of the possible impact seems timely and important.
The importance of genetic parenthood for infertile men and women.
S Hendriks,Karen Peeraer,Henny M. W. Bos,Sjoerd Repping,Eline Dancet,Eline Dancet,Eline Dancet +6 more
TL;DR: The presumed preference of couples for genetic parenthood was confirmed and resistance against using donor gametes is more likely among lower educated individuals.
37
The ethics of clinical applications of germline genome modification: a systematic review of reasons.
Ivy van Dijke,Ivy van Dijke,Lance Bosch,Annelien L. Bredenoord,Martina C. Cornel,Sjoerd Repping,S Hendriks,S Hendriks +7 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a systematic search yielded 1179 articles and 180 articles were included, covering reasons for or against clinical application of intentional modification of the nuclear DNA of the germline were included.
37