Background Caudal block is a common technique for paediatric analgesia but with the disadvantage of short duration of action after single injection. Caudal dexmedetomidine and clonidine could offer significant analgesic benefits. We compared the analgesic effects and side-effects of dexmedetomidine and clonidine added to bupivacaine in paediatric patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries. Methods Sixty patients (6 months to 6 yr) were evenly and randomly assigned into three groups in a double-blinded manner. After sevoflurane in oxygen anaesthesia, each patient received a single caudal dose of bupivacaine 0.25% (1 ml kg−1) combined with either dexmedetomidine 2 µg kg−1 in normal saline 1 ml, clonidine 2 µg kg−1 in normal saline 1 ml, or corresponding volume of normal saline according to group assignment. Haemodynamic variables, end-tidal sevoflurane, and emergence time were monitored. Postoperative analgesia, use of analgesics, and side-effects were assessed during the first 24 h. Results Addition of dexmedetomidine or clonidine to caudal bupivacaine significantly promoted analgesia time [median (95% confidence interval, CI): 16 (14–18) and 12 (3–21) h, respectively] than the use of bupivacaine alone [median (95% CI): 5 (4–6) h] with P Conclusions Addition of dexmedetomidine or clonidine to caudal bupivacaine significantly promoted analgesia in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries with no significant advantage of dexmedetomidine over clonidine and without an increase in incidence of side-effects.

Addition of clonidine or dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine prolongs caudal analgesia in children

UNLABELLED Ropivacaine is a long-acting, enantiomerically pure (S-enantiomer) amide local anaesthetic with a high pKa and low lipid solubility which blocks nerve fibres involved in pain transmission (Adelta and C fibres) to a greater degree than those controlling motor function (Abeta fibres). The drug was less cardiotoxic than equal concentrations of racemic bupivacaine but more so than lidocaine (lignocaine) in vitro and had a significantly higher threshold for CNS toxicity than racemic bupivacaine in healthy volunteers (mean maximum tolerated unbound arterial plasma concentrations were 0.56 and 0.3 mg/L, respectively). Extensive clinical data have shown that epidural ropivacaine 0.2% is effective for the initiation and maintenance of labour analgesia, and provides pain relief after abdominal or orthopaedic surgery especially when given in conjunction with opioids (coadministration with opioids may also allow for lower concentrations of ropivacaine to be used). The drug had efficacy generally similar to that of the same dose of bupivacaine with regard to pain relief but caused less motor blockade at low concentrations. Lumbar epidural administration of 20 to 30ml ropivacaine 0.5% provided anaesthesia of a similar quality to that achieved with bupivacaine 0.5% in women undergoing caesarean section, but the duration of motor blockade was shorter with ropivacaine. For lumbar epidural anaesthesia for lower limb or genitourinary surgery, comparative data suggest that higher concentrations of ropivacaine (0.75 or 1.0%) may be needed to provide the same sensory and motor blockade as bupivacaine 0.5 and 0.75%. In patients about to undergo upper limb surgery, 30 to 40ml ropivacaine 0.5% produced brachial plexus anaesthesia broadly similar to that achieved with equivalent volumes of bupivacaine 0.5%, although the time to onset of sensory block tended to be faster and the duration of motor block shorter with ropivacaine. Ropivacaine had an adverse event profile similar to that of bupivacaine in clinical trials. Several cases of CNS toxicity have been reported after inadvertent intravascular administration of ropivacaine, but only 1 case of cardiovascular toxicity has been reported to date. The outcome of these inadvertent intravascular administrations was favourable. CONCLUSION Ropivacaine is a well tolerated regional anaesthetic with an efficacy broadly similar to that of bupivacaine. However, it may be a preferred option because of its reduced CNS and cardiotoxic potential and its lower propensity for motor block.

Ropivacaine: an update of its use in regional anaesthesia.

Caudal additives in children—solutions or problems?

BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to determine whether caudal S-ketamine or clonidine prolonged analgesia together with ropivacaine. METHODS Sixty-three boys, aged 1-5 years, who were undergoing minor surgery, were allocated in order to receive one of three solutions for caudal anaesthesia. Group R received 2 mg x kg(-1) 0.2% ropivacaine; group C, 2 mg x kg(-1) 0.2% ropivacaine + clonidine 2 microg x kg(-1); and group K, 2 mg x kg(-1) 0.2% ropivacaine + S-ketamine 0.5 mg x kg(-1). RESULTS Postoperative analgesia assessed by CHEOPS lasted 701 min in group K (P < 0.05) compared with 492 min in group C and 291 min in group R. There were no significant differences between the groups for incidence of haemodynamic and respiratory alterations, motor block or sedation. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that S-ketamine 0.5 mg x kg(-1) when added to 0.2% caudal ropivacaine provides better postoperative analgesia than clonidine without any clinically significant side-effect.

How to prolong postoperative analgesia after caudal anaesthesia with ropivacaine in children: S-ketamine versus clonidine.

https://rapm.bmj.com/content/rapm/27/2/157.full.pdf

Comparison of Racemic Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine, and Levo-Bupivacaine for Pediatric Caudal Anesthesia: Effects on Postoperative Analgesia and Motor Block

Background: Adding clonidine to weak ropivacaine solutions (<0.2%) could potentially enhance analgesia as well as further reduce the risk for unwanted motor blockade. The aim of the present study was to compare the postoperative pain-relieving quality of a ropivacaine 0.1%-clonidine mixture to that of plain ropivacaine 0.2% following caudal administration in children.



Methods: In a prospective, observer-blinded fashion, 40 ASA 1 paediatric patients undergoing subumbilical surgery were randomly allocated to receive a caudal injection of either plain ropivacaine 0.2% (1 ml/kg) (R0.2) or a mixture of ropivacaine 0.1% with clonidine 2 μg/kg (1 ml/kg) (R0.1C). Objective pain scale score and need for supplemental analgesia were used to evaluate analgesia during the first 24 h postoperatively. Residual postoperative sedation was also assessed.



Results: A significantly higher number of patients in the R0.1C group (18/20) could be managed without supplemental analgesia during the first 24 h postoperatively compared to the R0.2 group (11/20) (P=0.034). Both the degree and the duration of postoperative sedation was similar in both groups. No signs of postoperative motor blockade were observed.



Conclusions: The combination of clonidine (2 μg/kg) and ropivacaine 0.1% is associated with an improved quality of postoperative analgesia compared to plain 0.2% ropivacaine. The improved analgesic quality of the clonidine-ropivacaine mixture is achieved without causing any significant degree of postoperative sedation.

Ropivacaine‐clonidine combination for caudal blockade in children

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

S. Giannone

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

Ropivacaine‐clonidine combination for caudal blockade in children