Russell J. Shiel
University of Adelaide
88 Papers
1K Citations
Russell J. Shiel is an academic researcher from University of Adelaide. The author has contributed to research in topics: Zooplankton & Wetland. The author has an hindex of 33, co-authored 85 publications. Previous affiliations of Russell J. Shiel include Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation & University of Waterloo.
Chat about Author
Papers
Monitoring change in aquatic invertebrate biodiversity : sample size, faunal elements and analytical methods.
TL;DR: Results of testing an alternative protocol, whereby only two samples are collected from a wetland per monitoring event and then analysed using ordination to detect any changes in invertebrate biodiversity over time, suggest it would be a cost-effective method of monitoring changes in biodiversity.
42
Halophile aquatic invertebrates in the wheatbelt region of south-western Australia.
Adrian Pinder,Stuart Halse,Russell J. Shiel,David J. Cale,Jane M. McRae +4 more
- 01 Dec 2002
TL;DR: In the wheatbelt region o f inland south-western Australia, extensive dearing of native vegetation for dryland agriculture has reduced evapotran-piratio-1 which, in turn, has caused ground water to sink and waterlogging of aquatic and terrestrial environments.
Australian Rotifera: ecology and biogeography
Russell J. Shiel,W. Koste +1 more
- 01 Jan 1986
TL;DR: The status of studies on Australian rotifera is reviewed in this paper, where the ecology of rotifers in four broad habitat categories (saline lakes, billabongs, reservoirs and rivers) is summarized and the biogeography of the known fauna considered.
36
Feeding Behaviour and Limb Morphology of Two Cladocerans with Small Intersetular Distances
George G. Ganf,Russell J. Shiel +1 more
TL;DR: Both cladocerans showed differences in their feeding behaviour when offered a range of phytoplankton species but both fed most efficiently on A. falcatus, indicating that limb morphologies that differentiated them from their Northern Hemisphere counterparts, this was not reflected in theirfeeding behaviour.
36