Correction to: Screening for autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions during pregnancy and preconception: a practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Summary Background Huntington's disease is a fatal neurodegenerative disorder that is caused by CAG-CAA repeat expansion, encoding polyglutamine, in the huntingtin (HTT) gene. Current age-of-clinical-onset prediction models for Huntington's disease are based on polyglutamine length and explain only a proportion of the variability in age of onset observed between patients. These length-based assays do not interrogate the underlying genetic variation, because known genetic variants in this region do not alter the protein coding sequence. Given that individuals with identical repeat lengths can present with Huntington's disease decades apart, the search for genetic modifiers of clinical age of onset has become an active area of research. Recent developments Results from three independent genetic studies of Huntington's disease have shown that glutamine-encoding CAA variants that interrupt DNA CAG repeat tracts, but do not alter polyglutamine length or polyglutamine homogeneity, are associated with substantial differences in age of onset of Huntington's disease in carriers. A variant that results in the loss of CAA interruption is associated with early onset and is particularly relevant to individuals that carry alleles in the reduced penetrance range (ie, CAG 36–39). Approximately a third of clinically manifesting carriers of reduced penetrance alleles, defined by current diagnostics, carry this variant. Somatic repeat instability, modified by interrupted CAG tracts, is the most probable cause mediating this effect. This relationship is supported by genome-wide screens for disease modifiers, which have revealed the importance of DNA-repair genes in Huntington's disease (ie, FAN1, LIG1, MLH1, MSH3, PMS1, and PMS2). Where next? Focus needs to be placed on refining our understanding of the effect of the loss-of-interruption and duplication-of-interruption variants and other interrupting sequence variants on age of onset, and assessing their effect in disease-relevant brain tissues, as well as in diverse population groups, such as individuals from Africa and Asia. Diagnostic tests should be augmented or updated, since current tests do not assess the underlying DNA sequence variation, especially when assessing individuals that carry alleles in the reduced penetrance range. Future studies should explore somatic repeat instability and DNA repair as new therapeutic targets to modify age of onset in Huntington's disease and in other repeat-mediated disorders. Disease-modifying therapies could potentially be developed by therapeutically targeting these processes. Promising approaches include therapeutically targeting the expanded repeat or directly perturbing key DNA-repair genes (eg, with antisense oligonucleotides or small molecules). Targeting the CAG repeat directly with naphthyridine-azaquinolone, a compound that induces contractions, and altering the expression of MSH3, represent two viable therapeutic strategies. However, as a first step, the capability of such novel therapeutic approaches to delay clinical onset in animal models should be assessed.

Interrupting sequence variants and age of onset in Huntington's disease: clinical implications and emerging therapies.

Genetic ancestry analysis on >93,000 individuals undergoing expanded carrier screening reveals limitations of ethnicity-based medical guidelines.

Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) provides people with information about their chance of having children with autosomal recessive or X-linked genetic conditions, enabling informed reproductive decision-making. RGCS is recommended to be offered to all couples during preconception or in early pregnancy. However, cost and a lack of awareness may prevent access. To address this, the Australian Government funded Mackenzie’s Mission—the Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project. Mackenzie’s Mission aims to assess the acceptability and feasibility of an easily accessible RGCS program, provided free of charge to the participant. In study Phase 1, implementation needs were mapped, and key study elements were developed. In Phase 2, RGCS is being offered by healthcare providers educated by the study team. Reproductive couples who provide consent are screened for over 1200 genes associated with >750 serious, childhood-onset genetic conditions. Those with an increased chance result are provided comprehensive genetic counseling support. Reproductive couples, recruiting healthcare providers, and study team members are also invited to complete surveys and/or interviews. In Phase 3, a mixed-methods analysis will be undertaken to assess the program outcomes, psychosocial implications and implementation considerations alongside an ongoing bioethical analysis and a health economic evaluation. Findings will inform the implementation of an ethically robust RGCS program.

/pdf/the-australian-reproductive-genetic-carrier-screening-11ggs6o7.pdf

The Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project (Mackenzie’s Mission): Design and Implementation

Expanded carrier screening (ECS) intends to broadly screen healthy individuals to determine their reproductive chance for autosomal recessive (AR) and X‐linked (XL) conditions with infantile or early‐childhood onset, which may impact reproductive management (Committee Opinion 690, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2017, 129, e35). Compared to ethnicity‐based screening, which requires accurate knowledge of ancestry for optimal test selection and appropriate risk assessment, ECS panels consist of tens to hundreds of AR and XL conditions that may be individually rare in various ancestries but offer a comprehensive approach to inherited disease screening. As such, the term “equitable carrier screening” may be preferable. This practice guideline provides evidence‐based recommendations for ECS using the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework (Guyatt et al., BMJ, 2008, 336, 995; Guyatt et al., BMJ, 2008, 336, 924). We used evidence from a recent systematic evidence review (Ramdaney et al., Genetics in Medicine, 2022, 20, 374) and compiled data from peer‐reviewed literature, scientific meetings, and clinical experience. We defined and prioritized the outcomes of informed consent, change in reproductive plans, yield in identification of at‐risk carrier pairs/pregnancies, perceived barriers to ECS, amount of provider time spent, healthcare costs, frequency of severely/profoundly affected offspring, incidental findings, uncertain findings, patient satisfaction, and provider attitudes. Despite the recognized barriers to implementation and change in management strategies, this analysis supported implementation of ECS for these outcomes. Based upon the current level of evidence, we recommend ECS be made available for all individuals considering reproduction and all pregnant reproductive pairs, as ECS presents an ethnicity‐based carrier screening alternative which does not rely on race‐based medicine. The final decision to pursue carrier screening should be directed by shared decision‐making, which takes into account specific features of patients as well as their preferences and values. As a periconceptional reproductive risk assessment tool, ECS is superior compared to ethnicity‐based carrier screening in that it both identifies more carriers of AR and XL conditions as well as eliminates a single race‐based medical practice. ECS should be offered to all who are currently pregnant, considering pregnancy, or might otherwise biologically contribute to pregnancy. Barriers to the broad implementation of and access to ECS should be identified and addressed so that test performance for carrier screening will not depend on social constructs such as race.

Expanded carrier screening for reproductive risk assessment: An evidence‐based practice guideline from the National Society of Genetic Counselors

Clinical experience with carrier screening in a general population: support for a comprehensive pan-ethnic approach.

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

Robert Boostanfar

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

Clinical experience with carrier screening in a general population: support for a comprehensive pan-ethnic approach.