The year 2018 marks the twenty-fifth anniversary of publication of Joan Tronto’s Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. The argument advanced by Tronto in Moral Boundaries represented a significant intervention in feminist scholarship on the question of care and its provision, principally because it called our attention to the political contexts within which this work is always conducted. In this symposium, we have asked contributors to revisit Tronto’s contribution with an eye toward assessing the current state of our theoretical as well as political engagement with the question of “social reproduction” in its many forms. This symposium concludes with a response by Tronto to her interlocutors. For those who are unfamiliar with this path-breaking book or who have not read it recently, Moral Boundaries opens with a question: “What would it mean in late twentieth century American society to take seriously, as part of our definition of a good society, the values of caring — attentiveness, responsibility, nurturance, compassion, meeting others’ needs — traditionally associated with women and traditionally excluded from public consideration?” (2–3). The very asking of this question represented a challenge to much influential feminist scholarship at the

Symposium Review: 25th Anniversary of Moral Boundaries by Joan Tronto

政治自由主义 = Political liberalism

Some people may be laughing when looking at you reading in your spare time. Some may be admired of you. And some may want be like you who have reading hobby. What about your own feel? Have you felt right? Reading is a need and a hobby at once. This condition is the on that will make you feel that you must read. If you know are looking for the book enPDFd a defense of abortion as the choice of reading, you can find here.

/pdf/a-defense-of-abortion-4q0qplu2pt.pdf

A Defense of Abortion

HRS Expert Consensus Statement on the Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) in patients nearing end of life or requesting withdrawal of therapy. This document was developed in collaboration and endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Geriatrics Society (AGS), the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM);

One of liberalism’s core commitments is to safeguarding individuals’ autonomy.
And a central aspect of liberal social justice is the commitment
to protecting the vulnerable. Taken together, and combined with an understanding
of autonomy as an acquired set of capacities to lead one’s
own life, these commitments suggest that liberal societies should be especially
concerned to address vulnerabilities of individuals regarding the
development and maintenance of their autonomy. In this chapter, we
develop an account of what it would mean for a society to take seriously
the obligation to reduce individuals’ autonomy-related vulnerabilities to
an acceptable minimum. In particular, we argue that standard liberal accounts
underestimate the scope of this obligation because they fail to
appreciate various threats to autonomy.
The reason these vulnerabilities have been underestimated, we believe,
is because autonomy has generally been understood in an essentially individualistic
fashion. The alternative account of autonomy we sketch here
highlights the ways in which individuals’ autonomy can be diminished or
impaired through damage to the social relations that support autonomy.
By articulating a conception of autonomy in terms of, more specifically,
a theory of mutual recognition, we aim to pinpoint the individualistic
bias in liberal accounts and the concomitant underestimation of our dependence
on relationships of respect, care, and esteem. We conclude
by anticipating some broader implications of this for how proceduralist
accounts of social justice ought to be revised.

/pdf/autonomy-vulnerability-recognition-and-justice-3eupriht0z.pdf

Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice

Definition d'un fondement philosophique pour la pensee commune et la pensee juridique du statut moral de l'enfant et d'une theorie philosophique pour justifier nos convictions morales et la politique publique en matiere de parente, d'adoption et d'education. Reconciliant la these de la consideration et du traitement egaux de l'enfant et l'adulte, d'une part, avec la these d'un droit parental limite, d'autre part, l'A. developpe une approche de l'enfant fondee sur ses droits et sur le respect de sa personne

The Moral Status of Children: Children's Rights, Parents' Rights, and Family Justice

Distinguant huit cas d'actions manipulatrices fondees sur la tentation, l'incitation, l'insinuation, le conditionement et le jeu sur les emotions, l'A. developpe une analyse conceptuelle de la notion de manipulation et une analyse morale de l'action trompeuse qui revelent le traitement mecanique de la personne et le non-respect de la personnalite de la victime

Manipulative Actions: A Conceptual and Moral Analysis

Cass Sunstein and Richard Thaler recommend helping people make better decisions by employing 'nudges', which they define as noncoercive methods of influencing choice for the better. Not surprisingly, healthcare practitioners and public policy professionals have become interested in whether nudges might be a promising method of improving health-related behaviors without resorting to heavy-handed methods such as coercion, deception, or government regulation. Many nudges seem unobjectionable as they merely improve the quality and quantity available for the decision-maker. However, other nudges influence decision-making in ways that do not involve providing more and better information. Nudges of this sort raise concerns about manipulation. This paper will focus on noninformational nudges that operate by changing the salience of various options. It will survey two approaches to understanding manipulation, one which sees manipulation as a kind of pressure, and one that sees it as a kind of trickery. On the pressure view, salience nudges do not appear to be manipulative. However, on the trickery view (which the author favors), salience nudges will be manipulative if they increase the salience so that it is disproportionate to that fact's true relevance and importance for the decision at hand. By contrast, salience nudges will not be manipulative if they merely highlight some fact that is true and important for the decision at hand. The paper concludes by providing examples of both manipulative and nonmanipulative salience nudges.

Manipulation, salience, and nudges.

Autonomy and the paradox of self-creation infinite regresses, finite selves, and the limits of authenticity

L'A. defend la conception internaliste du bien-etre fondee sur le desir de la personne, contre les objections qui font reference a l'argument glissant (slippery slope) de la perspective de l'observateur ideal. S'appuyant sur une theorie du moi qui distingue les aspects essentiels et les aspects peripheriques de l'identite, et examinant les notions vie bonne et vertu, l'A. etablit une relation necessaire, mais non pas identique, entre le concept psychologique d'integrite et le concept ontologique d'identite personnelle

Integrity, the Self, and Desire-based Accounts of the Good

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

Robert A Noggle

Author Tools

Chat about Author