Ping Li
Jilin University
11 Papers
Ping Li is an academic researcher from Jilin University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Randomized controlled trial & Meta-analysis. The author has an hindex of 3, co-authored 11 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
The effectiveness of aromatherapy on preoperative anxiety in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
TL;DR: Aromatherapy is an effective intervention for reducing preoperative anxiety in adults and short-length aromatherapy inhalation seems to be more worthy of being recommended in clinical settings.
82
Effects of exercise on pregnancy and postpartum fatigue: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
TL;DR: The results of meta-analysis of five studies showed that exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period may have beneficial effects on women's fatigue and more available data from large-scale and high-quality trials are needed to demonstrate the effects of exercise on pregnant and post partum fatigue.
37
Complementary and alternative medicine for natural and treatment-induced vasomotor symptoms: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
TL;DR: Evidence has shown that acupuncture, hypnosis, paced respiration, cognitive behavioural therapy, genistein, soy isoflavones, S-equol, combined preparations of black cohosh, and omega-3 supplements could significantly reduce VMS.
29
Web-based decision aids to support breast cancer screening decisions: systematic review and meta-analysis.
TL;DR: A positive effect of web-based DAs on patient-centered outcomes in breast cancer screening was showed and more internet devices and free or larger discount WI-FI should be established to ensure more women can benefit from this effective tool.
28
Mind-body interventions on stress management in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
TL;DR: The overall meta-analysis showed that antenatal stress of pregnant women in the mind-body interventions groups showed significant high improvements and should be interpreted with caution because of high heterogeneity and publication bias.
23