The following recommendations for post-polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance apply to all patients who had one or more polyps that were completely removed during a high quality baseline colonoscopy 1 ESGE recommends that patients with complete removal of 1 – 4 Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence If organized screening is not available, repetition of colonoscopy 10 years after the index procedure is recommended Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence 2 ESGE recommends surveillance colonoscopy after 3 years for patients with complete removal of at least 1 adenoma ≥ 10 mm or with high grade dysplasia, or ≥ 5 adenomas, or any serrated polyp ≥ 10 mm or with dysplasia Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence 3 ESGE recommends a 3 – 6-month early repeat colonoscopy following piecemeal endoscopic resection of polyps ≥ 20 mm Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence A first surveillance colonoscopy 12 months after the repeat colonoscopy is recommended to detect late recurrence Strong recommendation, high quality evidence 4 If no polyps requiring surveillance are detected at the first surveillance colonoscopy, ESGE suggests to perform a second surveillance colonoscopy after 5 years Weak recommendation, low quality evidence After that, if no polyps requiring surveillance are detected, patients can be returned to screening 5 ESGE suggests that, if polyps requiring surveillance are detected at first or subsequent surveillance examinations, surveillance colonoscopy may be performed at 3 years Weak recommendation, low quality evidence A flowchart showing the recommended surveillance intervals is provided ( Fig 1 )

/pdf/post-polypectomy-colonoscopy-surveillance-european-society-4e7fj7b5e5.pdf

Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020

Currently, the main targets of drug therapy for ulcerative colitis [UC] are endoscopic and clinical remission. However, there is active discussion about the additional advantages of including histological remission as a target. Accumulating evidence indicates that microscopic activity persists in endoscopically quiescent UC, that histological changes may lag behind clinical remission after treatment, and that absence of histological activity predicts lower rates of relapse, hospitalization, surgery and subsequent neoplasia. Obtaining useful information from mucosal biopsies in this setting depends on accurate and consistent evaluation of histological features. However, there is no standardization of biopsy procedures, histological sample processing technique or histological scoring systems, and there is no agreement on the definitions of histological remission, response or activity. Accordingly, a consensus expert panel convened by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] reviewed the literature and agreed a number of position statements regarding harmonization of UC histopathology. The objective was to provide evidence-based guidance for the standardization and harmonization of procedures, definitions and scoring systems for histology in UC, and to reach expert consensus where possible. We propose the absence of intraepithelial neutrophils, erosion and ulceration as a minimum requirement for the definition of histological remission. For randomized control trials we recommend the use of the Robarts histopathology index [RHI] or the Nancy index [NI]. For observational studies or in clinical practice we recommend the use of the NI. To predict the risk of future neoplasia in UC, cumulative histological scores over time are more useful than single scores.

ECCO Position Paper: Harmonization of the Approach to Ulcerative Colitis Histopathology.

https://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(14)00038-8/pdf

Colonoscopy utilization and outcomes 2000 to 2011

https://www.gastroenterologyandhepatology.net/files/2013/10/gh1011_Abreu1.pdf

Predictors of aggressive inflammatory bowel disease

Augmented reality (AR) is an environment-enhancing technology, widely applied in the computer sciences, which has only recently begun to permeate the medical field. Gastrointestinal endoscopy—which relies on the integration of highdefinition video data with pathologic correlates—requires endoscopists to assimilate and process a tremendous amount of data in real time. We believe that AR is well positioned to provide computer-guided assistance with a wide variety of endoscopic applications, beginning with polyp detection. In this article, we review the principles of AR, describe its potential integration into an endoscopy set-up, and envisage a series of novel uses. With close collaboration between physicians and computer scientists, AR promises to contribute significant improvements to the field of endoscopy.

/pdf/computer-vision-and-augmented-reality-in-gastrointestinal-rpqcfmx8sy.pdf

Computer vision and augmented reality in gastrointestinal endoscopy

BACKGROUND: Adenomatous polyps greater than 1 cm are defined as advanced adenomas. Inaccurate size estimation can lead to inappropriate surveillance recommendations of colorectal adenomas. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of endoscopic polyp mis-sizing on colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations. DESIGN: This is a prospective study. SETTING: This study was conducted in a gastroenterology practice at a US academic medical center. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance colonoscopies from 2010 to 2011 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Endoscopic size estimates of polyps 10 to 25 mm were compared with postfixation histopathologic polyp measurements for 15 different gastroenterologists. Only adenomatous polyps removed in entirety by snare polypectomy were included in the analysis. Size variation was defined as (endoscopic estimate − histopathologic size)/(histopathologic size). Clinical mis-sizing was defined as a size variation of >33%. The mean size variation, the percentage of clinical mis-sizing, and the percentage of inappropriate surveillance recommendation due to size variation >33% were reported per endoscopist. RESULTS: Included for analysis were 4990 procedures from 15 gastroenterologists. A total of 230 polyps from 200 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 62.6 years (SD 10.1), and 52% were men. The mean size variation between the endoscopic polyp size estimation and the histopathologic polyp was 73.6% (range of mean size variation, 13%–127%). 62.6% (range, 0%–91%) of included polyps had clinical mis-sizing. Of included polypectomies, 35.2% (range, 0%–67%) resulted in an inappropriate surveillance recommendation due to clinical mis-sizing even after considering histology and synchronous polyps. LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: There is marked variation in endoscopists’ ability to accurately size adenomatous polyps. Some endoscopists rarely mis-size adenomas, and their surveillance recommendations are appropriate in regard to sizing. However, other endoscopists inaccurately size adenomas, and this leads to inappropriate surveillance of colorectal polyps. In this study, approximately 1 of 3 included polypectomies yielded inappropriate surveillance recommendations because of clinical mis-sizing.

Endoscopic mis-sizing of polyps changes colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations.

PURPOSE: The ability of ulcerative colitis histology to predict medically refractory disease was evaluated. METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent colectomy for medically refractory disease were compared with 48 medically managed patients. All patients were followed up for > or =6 months. The study design was a retrospective longitudinal observational chart review to determine whether specific histologic parameters were predictive of a later colectomy for medically refractory disease. RESULTS: On initial biopsy, medically refractory patients were more likely to have severe cryptitis, 75% vs 49%; lymphoid follicles, 78% vs 48%; and erosions, 35% vs 11%. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of crypt abscesses, mucin depletion, crypt distortion, or mucosal ulceration between medically refractory and medically managed patients. Active inflammation on endoscopy was not statistically different between groups (P = .192). In a recursive partition model, the strongest predictors of future colectomy were age dependent. Among older patients (>38 y), severe cryptitis was the strongest determinant of refractory disease. Only 1 of 21 (5%) of the patients who initially did not have severe cryptitis progressed to colectomy. In younger patients (< or =38 y), the presence of lymphoid follicles was the strongest predictor of future colectomy; 9 of 14 (64%) patients with lymphoid follicles progressed to colectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Medically refractory ulcerative colitis was associated with initial biopsy findings of severe cryptitis, lymphoid follicles, and erosions. Refractory disease was not predicted by the severity or extent of endoscopic findings. In younger patients, the presence of lymphoid follicles, and in older patients, severe cryptitis, were the most important predictors of medically refractory disease.

Histopathology predictors of medically refractory ulcerative colitis.

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

Peter Eichenseer

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

Endoscopic mis-sizing of polyps changes colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations.

Histopathology predictors of medically refractory ulcerative colitis.