Pavel Trofimovich
Concordia University
141 Papers
259 Citations
Pavel Trofimovich is an academic researcher from Concordia University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Pronunciation & Fluency. The author has an hindex of 30, co-authored 113 publications. Previous affiliations of Pavel Trofimovich include Northern Arizona University & Concordia University Wisconsin.
Chat about Author
Papers
Language experience in L2 phonological learning: Effects of psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic variables
TL;DR: This paper discussed the role of language experience in L2 phonological learning, with a particular focus on lexical frequency, attention to form, and ethnic identity as factors that influence language experience.
Kick the Ball or Kicked the Ball?: Perception of the Past Morpheme –ed by Second Language Learners
TL;DR: This article explored the roles of three perceptual factors (phonological environment, speech rate, semantic clues) among 106 second-language learners and 81 English speakers of a similar age in a forced-choice auditory identification task contrasting perceptually easy and hard contexts at a slowed-down speech rate.
19
Using ASR Technology in Language Training for Specific Purposes: A Perspective from Quebec, Canada
TL;DR: Analysis of the data file automatically generated by the module revealed improvements in acceptability of the nurses’ pronunciation of the medical interview questions, suggesting that the module can be effective in language training for healthcare professionals.
17
Engaging the senses: A sensory-based approach to L2 pronunciation instruction for actors
Suzanne Cerreta,Pavel Trofimovich +1 more
- 01 Jan 2018
TL;DR: This article examined the benefits of a sensory-based approach for teaching second language pronunciation to actors, addressing the unique learning goal of nativelike speech for nonnative professional actors, and found a significant improvement in accentedness for Marianne and greater comprehensibility for both actors, while qualitative data revealed actors' preferences for different types of instruction.
17