Computational models are an essential tool for the design, characterization, and discovery of novel materials. Computationally hard tasks in materials science stretch the limits of existing high-performance supercomputing centers, consuming much of their resources for simulation, analysis, and data processing. Quantum computing, on the other hand, is an emerging technology with the potential to accelerate many of the computational tasks needed for materials science. In order to do that, the quantum technology must interact with conventional high-performance computing in several ways: approximate results validation, identification of hard problems, and synergies in quantum-centric supercomputing. In this paper, we provide a perspective on how quantum-centric supercomputing can help address critical computational problems in materials science, the challenges to face in order to solve representative use cases, and new suggested directions. 

Quantum-centric supercomputing for materials science: A perspective on challenges and future directions

The emerging field of quantum computing has shown it might change how we process information by using the unique principles of quantum mechanics. As researchers continue to push the boundaries of quantum technologies to unprecedented levels, distributed quantum computing raises as an obvious path to explore with the aim of boosting the computational power of current quantum systems. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of the current state of the art in the distributed quantum computing field, exploring its foundational principles, landscape of achievements, challenges, and promising directions for further research. From quantum communication protocols to entanglement-based distributed algorithms, each aspect contributes to the mosaic of distributed quantum computing, making it an attractive approach to address the limitations of classical computing. Our objective is to provide an exhaustive overview for experienced researchers and field newcomers. 

pdf/review-of-distributed-quantum-computing-from-single-qpu-to-1knkz1gj46.pdf

Review of Distributed Quantum Computing. From single QPU to High
  Performance Quantum Computing

Quantum computing (QC) introduces a novel mode of computation with the possibility of greater computational power that remains to be exploited $\unicode{x2013}$ presenting exciting opportunities for high performance computing (HPC) applications. However, recent advancements in the field have made clear that QC does not supplant conventional HPC, but can rather be incorporated into current heterogeneous HPC infrastructures as an additional accelerator, thereby enabling the optimal utilization of both paradigms. The desire for such integration significantly affects the development of software for quantum computers, which in turn influences the necessary software infrastructure. To date, previous review papers have investigated various quantum programming tools (QPTs) (such as languages, libraries, frameworks) in their ability to program, compile, and execute quantum circuits. However, the integration effort with classical HPC frameworks or systems has not been addressed. This study aims to characterize existing QPTs from an HPC perspective, investigating if existing QPTs have the potential to be efficiently integrated with classical computing models and determining where work is still required. This work structures a set of criteria into an analysis blueprint that enables HPC scientists to assess whether a QPT is suitable for the quantum-accelerated classical application at hand.

pdf/integration-of-quantum-accelerators-with-high-performance-4yyu8q6sey.pdf

Integration of Quantum Accelerators with High Performance Computing - A Review of Quantum Programming Tools

Learning the problem structure at multiple levels of coarseness to inform the decomposition-based hybrid quantum-classical combinatorial optimization solvers is a promising approach to scaling up variational approaches. We introduce a multilevel algorithm reinforced with the spectral graph representation learning-based accelerator to tackle large-scale graph maximum cut instances and fused with several versions of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) and QAOA-inspired algorithms. The graph representation learning model utilizes the idea of QAOA variational parameters concentration and substantially improves the performance of QAOA. We demonstrate the potential of using multilevel QAOA and representation learning-based approaches on very large graphs by achieving high-quality solutions in a much faster time.\\ Reproducibility: Our source code and results are available at \url{https://github.com/bachbao/MLQAOA} 

pdf/mlqaoa-graph-learning-accelerated-hybrid-quantum-classical-y8y6cb57m5.pdf

MLQAOA: Graph Learning Accelerated Hybrid Quantum-Classical Multilevel
  QAOA

Quantum computers are the next evolution of computing hardware. Quantum devices are being exposed through the same familiar cloud platforms used for classical computers, and enabling seamless execution of hybrid applications that combine quantum and classical components. Quantum devices vary in features, e.g., number of qubits, quantum volume, CLOPS, noise profile, queuing delays and resource cost. So, it may be useful to split hybrid workloads with either large quantum circuits or large number of quantum circuits, into smaller units. In this paper, we profile two workload splitting techniques on IBM's Quantum Cloud: (1) Circuit parallelization, to split one large circuit into multiple smaller ones, and (2) Data parallelization to split a large number of circuits run on one hardware to smaller batches of circuits run on different hardware. These can improve the utilization of heterogenous quantum hardware, but involve trade-offs. We evaluate these techniques on two key algorithmic classes: Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) and Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM), and measure the impact on circuit execution times, pre- and post-processing overhead, and quality of the result relative to a baseline without parallelization. Results are obtained on real hardware and complemented by simulations. We see that (1) VQE with circuit cutting is ~39\% better in ground state estimation than the uncut version, and (2) QSVM that combines data parallelization with reduced feature set yields upto 3x improvement in quantum workload execution time and reduces quantum resource use by 3x, while providing comparable accuracy. Error mitigation can improve the accuracy by ~7\% and resource foot-print by ~4\% compared to the best case among the considered scenarios.

Parallelizing Quantum-Classical Workloads: Profiling the Impact of Splitting Techniques

Quantum computing has potential to provide exponential speedups over classical computing for many important applications. However, today's quantum computers are in their early stages, and hardware quality issues hinder the scale of program execution. Benchmarking and simulation of quantum circuits on classical computers is therefore essential to advance the understanding of how quantum computers and programs operate, enabling both algorithm discovery that leads to high-impact quantum computation and engineering improvements that deliver to more powerful quantum systems. Unfortunately, the nature of quantum information causes simulation complexity to scale exponentially with problem size. In this paper, we debut Super.tech's SuperSim framework, a new approach for high fidelity and scalable quantum circuit simulation. SuperSim employs two key techniques for accelerated quantum circuit simulation: Clifford-based simulation and circuit cutting. Through the isolation of Clifford subcircuit fragments within a larger non-Clifford circuit, resource-efficient Clifford simulation can be invoked, leading to significant reductions in runtime. After fragments are independently executed, circuit cutting and recombination procedures allow the final output of the original circuit to be reconstructed from fragment execution results. Through the combination of these two state-of-art techniques, SuperSim is a product for quantum practitioners that allows quantum circuit evaluation to scale beyond the frontiers of current simulators. Our results show that Clifford-based circuit cutting accelerates the simulation of near-Clifford circuits, allowing 100s of qubits to be evaluated with modest runtimes.

pdf/clifford-based-circuit-cutting-for-quantum-simulation-2oz48s96.pdf

Clifford-based Circuit Cutting for Quantum Simulation

We describe Superstaq, a quantum software platform that optimizes the execution of quantum programs by tailoring to underlying hardware primitives. For benchmarks such as the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm and the Qubit Coupled Cluster chemistry method, we find that deep optimization can improve program execution performance by at least 10x compared to prevailing state-of-the-art compilers. To highlight the versatility of our approach, we present results from several hardware platforms: superconducting qubits (AQT @ LBNL, IBM Quantum, Rigetti), trapped ions (QSCOUT), and neutral atoms (Infleqtion). Across all platforms, we demonstrate new levels of performance and new capabilities that are enabled by deeper integration between quantum programs and the device physics of hardware. 

Superstaq: Deep Optimization of Quantum Programs

Recent results on the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) have cast pessimism on its potential to exhibit practical quantum speedups. For instance, QAOA’s locality limits its performance on tasks such as coloring bipartite graphs—which is easy for classical methods. Motivated by these limitations, the Recursive QAOA was introduced to overcome the locality and symmetry of QAOA. Despite being more powerful than QAOA, RQAOA is fully classically simulable at level-1 depth (p = 1). We report results on RQAOA in this classically simulable regime, benchmarked on random Quantum Unconstrainted Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems with up to 100 variables. We find that RQAOA generally matches the performance of classical simulated annealing and significantly outperforms ordinary QAOA.

Benchmarking the recursive quantum approximate optimization algorithm

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

P. Frederick

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

Clifford-based Circuit Cutting for Quantum Simulation

Superstaq: Deep Optimization of Quantum Programs

Benchmarking the recursive quantum approximate optimization algorithm