Nicolas Bedon
University of Rouen
22 Papers
190 Citations
Nicolas Bedon is an academic researcher from University of Rouen. The author has contributed to research in topics: Countable set & Decidability. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 22 publications. Previous affiliations of Nicolas Bedon include Institut Gaspard Monge & University of Marne-la-Vallée.
Chat about Author
Papers
Finite automata and ordinals
TL;DR: The domain of Wojciechowski automata is restricted to the domain of Choueka's ones (that is, given n ω , the authors keep only α-sequences for α ω n +1 in the language defined by a WojCiechowsky automaton) in order to prove the equivalence between Choueka automata and Woj ciechowski automata.
44
An Eilenberg Theorem for Words on Countable Ordinals
Nicolas Bedon,Olivier Carton +1 more
- 20 Apr 1998
TL;DR: It is shown that finite Ω1-semigroups are equivalent to automata, and the proof gives a new algorithm for determinizing automata on countable ordinals.
29
Logic and Rational Languages of Words Indexed by Linear Orderings
TL;DR: It is proved that every rational language of words indexed by linear orderings is definable in monadic second-order logic, and it is shown that the converse is true for the class of languages indexed by countable scattered linear ordering, but false in the general case.
Automata, semigroups and recognizability of words on ordinals
TL;DR: For a given integer n, ωn-semigroups are defined as a generalization of ω-semIGroups for languages of words of length less than ω n+1, and those algebraic structures define the same sets as those recognized by Choueka automata when they are finite.
26
Logic and rational languages of words indexed by linear orderings
Nicolas Bedon,Alexis Bès,Olivier Carton,Chloé Rispal +3 more
- 07 Jun 2008
TL;DR: It is proved that every rational language of words indexed by linear orderings is definable in monadic second-order logic, and it is shown that the converse is true for the class of languages indexed by countable scattered linear ordering, but false in the general case.