Michaela Strinzel
Swiss National Science Foundation
11 Papers
16 Citations
Michaela Strinzel is an academic researcher from Swiss National Science Foundation. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 6 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
Predatory journals: no definition, no defence
Agnes Grudniewicz,David Moher,Kelly D. Cobey,Gregory L. Bryson,Samantha Cukier,Kristiann Allen,Clare L Ardern,Lesley Balcom,Tiago Barros,Monica Berger,Jairo Buitrago Ciro,Lucia Cugusi,Michael R. Donaldson,Matthias Egger,Ian D. Graham,Matt Hodgkinson,Karim M. Khan,Mahlubi Mabizela,Andrea Manca,Katrin Milzow,Johann Mouton,Marvelous Muchenje,Tom Olijhoek,Alexander Ommaya,Bhushan Patwardhan,Deborah Poff,Laurie Proulx,Marc A. Rodger,Anna Severin,Michaela Strinzel,Mauro Sylos-Labini,Robyn Tamblyn,Marthie van Niekerk,Jelte M. Wicherts,Manoj M. Lalu +34 more
TL;DR: Leading scholars and publishers from ten countries have agreed a definition of predatory publishing that can protect scholarship that took 12 hours of discussion, 18 questions and 3 rounds to reach.
Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis
TL;DR: An in-depth understanding of quality criteria for scholarly journals is developed by analyzing journals and publishers indexed in blacklists of predatory journals and whitelists of legitimate journals and the lists’ inclusion criteria to provide insights into their utility and delineates the different notions of quality and legitimacy in scholarly publishing used.
134
Characteristics of scholars who review for predatory and legitimate journals: linkage study of Cabells Scholarly Analytics and Publons data.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compared the characteristics of scholars who reviewed for predatory or legitimate journals in terms of their sociodemographic characteristics and reviewing and publishing behaviour using the Jaro-Winkler string metric.
20
Ten ways to improve academic CVs for fairer research assessment
Michaela Strinzel,Josh Brown,Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner,Sarah de Rijcke,Michael Hill +4 more
- 29 Oct 2021
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present ten ways to further develop the content and structure of academic CVs, inspired by a workshop of the CV Harmonization Group (H-Group), a joint initiative between researchers on research, academic data infrastructure organizations, and representatives from >15 funding organizations.
Who reviews for predatory journals? A study on reviewer characteristics
TL;DR: The characteristics of scholars who review for potentially predatory journals resemble those of authors who publish their work in these outlets, and stakeholders will need to adopt a holistic approach that takes into account the entire research workflow.