Michael D. Fayer
Stanford University
558 Papers
9K Citations
Michael D. Fayer is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Chemistry & Excited state. The author has an hindex of 84, co-authored 537 publications. Previous affiliations of Michael D. Fayer include University of California, Berkeley & Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Chat about Author
Papers
Translational-rotational coupling in supercooled liquids : heterodyne detected density induced molecular alignment
TL;DR: In this paper, an eightfold experimental cycle analogous to phase cycles in NMR is used to separate the DIHARD signal (density induced heterodyne amplified rotational dynamics) from optical Kerr effect contributions and thermal lensing effects.
Cytochrome c552 mutants : Structure and dynamics at the active site probed by multidimensional NMR and vibration echo spectroscopy
Aaron M. Massari,Brian L. McClain,Ilya J. Finkelstein,Andrew P. Lee,Heather L. Reynolds,Kara L. Bren,Michael D. Fayer +6 more
TL;DR: The vibrational echo experiments suggest a general trend for rapid ligand vibrational dynamics in the presence of a hydrogen bond donor.
Vibrational relaxation of carbon monoxide in model heme compounds. 6-coordinate metalloporphyrins (M = Fe, Ru, Os)
Jeffrey R. Hill,Dana D. Dlott,Michael D. Fayer,Kristen A. Peterson,Chris W. Rella,Michael M. Rosenblatt,Kenneth S. Suslick,Christopher J. Ziegler +7 more
TL;DR: In this article, the vibrational relaxation of carbon monoxide bound to a series of metalloporphyrin complexes (M-(coproporphyrinate-I tetraisopropyl ester)(CO)(pyridine); M = Fe, Ru, Os) was measured using picosecond infrared pump-probe experiments.
19
Solvent Control of the Soft Angular Potential in Hydroxyl−π Hydrogen Bonds: Inertial Orientational Dynamics
TL;DR: It is implied that local solvent structure acts as the controlling influence in determining the extent of inertial orientational relaxation, and therefore the angular potential, and that variation in the pi-hydrogen bond strength is of secondary importance.
18