Matt Carter
Bond University
7 Papers
7 Citations
Matt Carter is an academic researcher from Bond University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Systematic review & Technical standard. The author has an hindex of 3, co-authored 7 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: Evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module
TL;DR: The Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module offers users a reliable program to remove duplicate records with greater sensitivity and specificity than EndNote, which will save researchers and information specialists time and avoid research waste.
Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated systematic review automation tool use by systematic reviewers, health technology assessors and clinical guideline developerst, and found that 89% have used systematic review automated tools, most frequently whilst screening.
50
Determining the gaps between Cochrane reviews and trials of effectiveness of interventions for acute respiratory infections: an audit.
Jasmin Alloo,Sanya Vallath,Chris Del Mar,Chris Del Mar,Matt Carter,Sarah Thorning,Justin Clark,Justin Clark +7 more
TL;DR: This study addresses this second approach for the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group (CARIG) in order to identify RCTs of acute respiratory infections that have not been systematically reviewed.
Technical Standards for Integrating Automation Tools for Evidence Synthesis
Alexandra Bannach-Brown,Matt Carter,Paul Glasziou +2 more
- 08 Jul 2019
TL;DR: A set of standards for automation tools and platforms that have been built to aid the systematic review community are proposed to improve the integration of different tools into the research process and to increase transparency in the field of automation tools for evidence synthesis.
2
The TRIP database showed most Acute Respiratory Infections questions were already addressed by Cochrane reviews
TL;DR: ARI questions are common and repeated often, and most may have been addressed by Cochrane reviews or protocols, and form the basis of a priority list to assign resources for future Cochrane topics.
2