The present AST-IDCOP guidelines update information on BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection, replication, and disease, which impact kidney transplantation (KT), but rarely non-kidney solid organ transplantation (SOT). As pretransplant risk factors in KT donors and recipients presently do not translate into clinically validated measures regarding organ allocation, antiviral prophylaxis, or screening, all KT recipients should be screened for BKPyV-DNAemia monthly until month 9, and then every 3 months until 2 years posttransplant. Extended screening after 2 years may be considered in pediatric KT. Stepwise immunosuppression reduction is recommended for KT patients with plasma BKPyV-DNAemia of >1000 copies/mL sustained for 3 weeks or increasing to >10 000 copies/mL reflecting probable and presumptive BKPyV-associated nephropathy, respectively. Reducing immunosuppression is also the primary intervention for biopsy-proven BKPyV-associated nephropathy. Hence, allograft biopsy is not required for treating BKPyV-DNAemic patients with baseline renal function. Despite virological rationales, proper randomized clinical trials are lacking to generally recommend treatment by switching from tacrolimus to cyclosporine-A, from mycophenolate to mTOR inhibitors or leflunomide or by the adjunct use of intravenous immunoglobulins, leflunomide, or cidofovir. Fluoroquinolones are not recommended for prophylaxis or therapy. Retransplantation after allograft loss due to BKPyV nephropathy can be successful if BKPyV-DNAemia is definitively cleared, independent of failed allograft nephrectomy.

BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ajt.14314

Histological Evolution of BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy: Importance of Integrating Clinical and Pathological Findings.

This paper aims to present an overview of MICA and NKG2D genetic and functional interactions and their impact on kidney transplant outcome. Organ transplantation has gone from what can accurately be called a ‘‘clinical experiment’’ to a routine and reliable practice, which has proven to be clinically relevant, life-saving and cost effective when compared with non-transplantation management strategies of both chronic and acute end stage organ failures. The kidney is the most frequently transplanted organ in the world (transplant-observatory). The two treatment options for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are dialysis and/or transplantation. Compared with dialysis, transplantation is associated with significant improvements in quality of life and overall longevity. A strong relationship exists between allograft loss and Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) antibodies. HLA antibodies are not the only factor involved in graft loss, as multiple studies have shown that non-HLA antigens are also involved, even when a patient has a good HLA matche and receives standard immunosuppressive therapy. A deeper understanding of other biomarkers is therefore important, as it is likely to lead to better monitoring (and consequent success) of organ transplants. The objective is to fill the void left by extensive reviews that don’t often dive this deep into the importance of MICA and NKG2D in allograft acceptance and their partnership in the immune response. There are few papers that explore the relationship between these two protagonists when it comes to kidney transplantation. This is especially true for the role of NKG2D in kidney transplantation. These reasons give a special importance to this review, which aims to be a helpful tool in the hands of researchers in this field.

/pdf/mica-and-nkg2d-is-there-an-impact-on-kidney-transplant-1pjic5d55p.pdf

MICA and NKG2D: Is There an Impact on Kidney Transplant Outcome?

The current transplant immunology dogma defends that allograft rejection is initiated by recipient's adaptive immune system. In this prevalent model, innate immune cells in general, and NK cells in particular, are merely considered as downstream effectors which participate in the destruction of the graft only upon recruitment by adaptive effectors: alloreactive T cells or donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Challenging this vision, recent data demonstrated that recipients' NK cells are capable of a form of allorecognition because they can sense the absence of self HLA class I molecules on the surface of graft endothelial cells. Missing-self triggers mTORC1-dependent activation of NK cells, which in turn promote the development of graft microvascular inflammation and detrimentally impact graft survival. The fact that some patients develop chronic vascular rejection in absence of DSA or genetically-predicted missing self suggest that other molecular mechanisms could underly NK cell allorecognition. This review provides an overview of these proven and putative molecular mechanisms and discusses future research directions in this emerging field in organ transplant immunology. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Allograft recognition by recipient's NK cells: molecular mechanisms and role in transplant rejection

Background
BK virus is a common opportunistic post-transplantation viral infection. Although some risk factors have been studied in this context, the contribution of NK cells has not been assessed in detail.

Methods
In a group of kidney transplant recipients, we studied the association between (i) the likelihood of BK virus replication during the two-year period after kidney transplantation and (ii) the genotypes of the killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) repertoire and their human leukocyte antigen (HLA) ligands. Other clinical factors (such as defective organ recovery and immunosuppressive treatment) were also assessed.

Results
BK virus replication was observed in 43 of the 103 recipients (41%). Patients with BK virus replication in the plasma were more likely to display defective organ recovery in the first seven days post-transplantation. BK virus replication was not associated with Missing KIR ligands. However, BK virus replication was more frequent in patients with responsive NK cells (i.e. when a ligand for activating KIRs was not homozygous in the recipient and present in the donor).

Conclusion
Our results suggest that defective organ recovery and the recipient's activating KIR repertoire may be related (depending on HLA ligands present in the couple recipient / donor) to the reactivation of BK virus replication after kidney transplantation.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/tri.12820

The association between killer‐cell immunoglobulin‐like receptor (KIR) and KIR ligand genotypes and the likelihood of BK virus replication after kidney transplantation

Background BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) frequently reactivates in kidney transplant recipients during immunosuppressive therapy and triggers BKPyV-associated nephropathy and graft rejection. Determining effective risk factors for BKPyV reactivation is required to achieve efficient prevention. Methods This study investigated the role of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-related chain A (MICA) in BKPyV reactivation in a cohort of 144 transplant donor/recipient pairs, including recipients with no reactivation (controllers) and those with mild (virurics) or severe (viremics) BKPyV reactivation after graft receipt. Results We show that, in the kidney, MICA is predominantly expressed in tubule epithelial cells, the natural targets of BKPyV, questioning a role for MICA in the immune control of BKPyV infection. Focusing on MICA genotype, we found a lower incidence of BKPyV reactivation in recipients of a renal graft from a donor carrying the MICA A5.1 mutant, which encodes a truncated nonconventional MICA. We established that a mismatch for MICA A5.1 between transplant donor and recipient is critical for BKPyV reactivation and BKPyV-associated nephropathy. Functionally, we found that a low prevalence of BKPyV reactivation was associated with elevated anti-MICA sensitization and reduced plasma level of soluble MICA in recipients, 2 potential effector mechanisms. Discussions These findings identify the MHC-related MICA as an immunogenetic factor that may functionally influence anti-BKPyV immune responses and infection outcomes.

/pdf/mica-mutant-a5-1-influences-bk-polyomavirus-reactivation-and-1f5opndskl.pdf

MICA Mutant A5.1 Influences BK Polyomavirus Reactivation and Associated Nephropathy After Kidney Transplantation

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

Mary-Luce Cheneau

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

MICA Mutant A5.1 Influences BK Polyomavirus Reactivation and Associated Nephropathy After Kidney Transplantation