M. Hellman
Nova Southeastern University
8 Papers
5 Citations
M. Hellman is an academic researcher from Nova Southeastern University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Frozen shoulder. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 8 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
Efficacy of a static progressive stretch device as an adjunct to physical therapy in treating adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a prospective, randomised study.
TL;DR: Use of a static progressive stretch device in combination with traditional therapy appears to have beneficial long-term effects on shoulder range of motion, pain and functional outcomes in patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder.
49
Long-term results of radial extracorporeal shock wave treatment for chronic plantar fasciopathy: A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with two years follow-up
Mahmoud Ibrahim Ibrahim,Robert A. Donatelli,M. Hellman,Ahmed Z. Hussein,John P. Furia,Christoph Schmitz +5 more
TL;DR: Data indicate that rESWT is effective and safe for the management of cPF with long‐term follow‐up of 2 years.
40
Static progressive stretch is effective in treating shoulder adhesive capsulitis: Prospective, randomized, controlled study with a two-year follow-up
TL;DR: Lasting favorable effects of the SPS device used with traditional physical therapy in treating subjects with shoulder adhesive capsulitis showed lasting favorable effects.
12
Partial versus full range of back extension endurance testing using the Swiss ball in discogenic low back pain patients: A comparative study
Tarek M. El-gohary,M. Hellman,Mahmoud I. Ibrahim,Amr Almaz Abdel-aziem,Usama Ahmed Khaled,Sameh Ahmed +5 more
TL;DR: Patients with chronic DLBP had increased holding time when back extension endurance testing was performed at partial as opposed to full range of motion, according to the intraclass correlation coefficient.
6
A preliminary analysis of outcomes and end range procedures used to achieve centralization in people with low back pain.
TL;DR: Limiting the end range procedures used to assess centralization may fail to identify patients who can achieve centralization and subsequently have positive clinical outcomes, and larger cohort studies investigating relationships between outcomes and the types of end range procedure used to achievecentralization would contribute to management of people with LBP.
1