Laurent Lamy
Paris School of Economics
31 Papers
79 Citations
Laurent Lamy is an academic researcher from Paris School of Economics. The author has contributed to research in topics: Common value auction & Bidding. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 27 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
On Discrimination in Auctions with Endogenous Entry
Philippe Jehiel,Laurent Lamy +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the optimal discrimination for first-price auctions is investigated. But the authors consider a different form of optimal discrimination: when entry is exogenous, strong buyers should be discriminated against weak buyers to maximize revenues.
Core-selecting package auctions: a comment on revenue-monotonicity
TL;DR: It is shown that no bidder-optimal Core-selecting auction can satisfy revenue-monotonicity for general preferences when there are at least three goods for sale, while the property holds for any bidder- optimize Core- selecting auction in environments with only two goods or if the characteristic function is submodular.
31
On absolute auctions and secret reserve prices
Philippe Jehiel,Laurent Lamy +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the use of auctions with zero public reserve prices, also called absolute auctions, or auctions with secret reserve prices is somewhat puzzling despite being common, and it is shown in a competitive environment that these auction formats may endogenously emerge.
30
The Shill Bidding Effect versus the Linkage Principle
TL;DR: The General Symmetric Model introduced by Milgrom and Weber is characterized, with the full set of separating equilibria that are symmetric among buyers and with a strategic seller being able to bid in the same way as any buyer through a so-called shill bidding activity.
28
•Posted Content
On the benefits of set-asides
Philippe Jehiel,Laurent Lamy +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that when the set of potential participants is composed of an incumbent and of entrants who show up endogenously (in such a way that their expected rents are fixed by outside options), then it is always beneficial to exclude the incumbent in the second-price auction.
16