Kevin A. Naudé
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
11 Papers
8 Citations
Kevin A. Naudé is an academic researcher from Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Similarity measure & Similarity (network science). The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 11 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
Refined pivot selection for maximal clique enumeration in graphs
TL;DR: This article re-examines the pivoting Bron-Kerbosch algorithm for identifying all maximal cliques within a graph and finds that there exist pivot candidates which may be selected with no penalty to the worst-case running time, even if they do not satisfy the established conditions for the known complexity bound.
31
Jenuity: a lightweight development environment for intermediate level programming courses
Martin van Tonder,Kevin A. Naudé,Charmain Cilliers +2 more
- 30 Jun 2008
TL;DR: The requirements, development and optimisation of Jenuity, an efficient development environment for the Java programming language, are discussed and techniques used to optimise Jenuity for low specification student hardware are presented.
7
Assessing program code through static structural similarity
Kevin A. Naudé
- 01 Jan 2007
TL;DR: A novel graph similarity measure, the Weighted Assignment Similarity measure, which is related to SimRank, but derives propagation scores from only the locally optimal mapping between child vertices, and a method for incorporating these local attribute similarities into the larger similarity propagation method.
4
The effective use of the exhaustive search block matching algorithm in railway line tracking
Enock T. Chekure,Kevin A. Naudé,Peter Freere +2 more
- 01 Sep 2017
TL;DR: The main focus of the research is to implement the exhaustive search block matching algorithm optimally and resolve any implementation problems that may arise, and to eliminate many video processing techniques.
3
Sketch-based interfaces: drawings to data
Timothy Matthews,Dieter Vogts,Kevin A. Naudé +2 more
- 07 Oct 2013
TL;DR: The main findings of the evaluation were that users found the sketch-based interaction intuitive, easy to learn and preferred it to standard interaction techniques.
2