Keshi Dai
Northeastern University
8 Papers
69 Citations
Keshi Dai is an academic researcher from Northeastern University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Relevance (information retrieval) & Metasearch engine. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 8 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
Recognizing emotion in speech using neural networks
Keshi Dai,Harriet J. Fell,Joel MacAuslan +2 more
- 16 Apr 2008
TL;DR: This paper used landmark and other acoustic features to recognize different emotional states in speech and extracted 62 features from each utterance to build a neural network classifier that obtained over 90% accuracy in distinguishing hot anger and neutral states.
Modeling score distributions for information retrieval
Javed A. Aslam,Keshi Dai +1 more
- 01 Jan 2012
TL;DR: A new framework for inferring score distributions when the relevance information is unavailable is presented, and it is demonstrated that it is more effective when it is applied on the task of metasearch.
24
Comparing emotions using acoustics and human perceptual dimensions
Keshi Dai,Harriet J. Fell,Joel MacAuslan +2 more
- 04 Apr 2009
TL;DR: A study of human perception of six emotions based on three perceptual dimensions and compared the human classification with machine classification based on many acoustic parameters shows that the six emotions cluster differently according to acoustic features and to perceptions.
16
Extended expectation maximization for inferring score distributions
Keshi Dai,Virgil Pavlu,Evangelos Kanoulas,Javed A. Aslam +3 more
- 01 Apr 2012
TL;DR: The EM algorithm is extended by simultaneously considering the ranked lists of documents returned by multiple retrieval systems, and by encoding in the algorithm the constraint that the same document retrieved by multiple systems should have the same, global, probability of relevance.
•Proceedings Article
Northeastern University in TREC 2009 Million Query Track
Evangelos Kanoulas,Keshi Dai,Virgiliu Pavlu,Stefan Savev,Javed A. Aslam +4 more
- 01 Nov 2009
TL;DR: This work states that relatively little research has been conducted on the construction of appropriate learning to rank data sets nor on the effect of these data sets on the ability of a learning-to-rank algorithm to "learn" effectively.