Katherine M. Kelley
Fort Hays State University
9 Papers
94 Citations
Katherine M. Kelley is an academic researcher from Fort Hays State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Deception & Organizational communication. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 9 publications. Previous affiliations of Katherine M. Kelley include University of Oklahoma & Oral Roberts University.
Chat about Author
Papers
Effects of Veracity, Modality, and Sanctioning on Credibility Assessment During Mediated and Unmediated Interviews:
Norah E. Dunbar,Matthew L. Jensen,Judee K. Burgoon,Katherine M. Kelley,Kylie J. Harrison,Bradley J. Adame,Daniel R. Bernard +6 more
TL;DR: Those in the deceptive VC conditions (especially sanctioned liars) were rated by interviewers as more dominant, involved, relaxed, and active than those in the FtF condition, revealing that modality affected deceivers’ demeanor.
54
Empowered by Persuasive Deception: The Effects of Power and Deception on Dominance, Credibility, and Decision Making
Norah E. Dunbar,Matthew L. Jensen,Elena Bessarabova,Judee K. Burgoon,Daniel R. Bernard,Kylie J. Harrison,Katherine M. Kelley,Bradley J. Adame,Jacqueline M. Eckstein +8 more
TL;DR: Examination of how power differences and deception jointly influence interactional dominance, credibility, and the outcomes of decision-making revealed that participants in the deception condition reported asignificant increase in perceptions of their own power whereas their truthful partners reported a significant decrease in perceptions.
38
Hierarchical Mum Effect: A New Investigation of Organizational Ethics
TL;DR: This paper found that females, younger workers, and those with the least work experience are more indirect in denying an unethical request than supervisors and coworkers, while a hierarchical mum effect was observed in denial directness.
26
When Serial Arguments Predict Harm: Examining the Influences of Argument Function, Topic of the Argument, Perceived Resolvability, and Argumentativeness
TL;DR: This article examined features of serial arguments that predict whether these arguments lead to perceived relational harm and perceived harm to the arguing individual, and found that the argument functioned to resolve behavioral incompatibility was positively related to both relational and personal harm.
25
The Viability of Using Rapid Judgments as a Method of Deception Detection
Norah E. Dunbar,Matthew L. Jensen,Lindsey A. Harvell-Bowman,Katherine M. Kelley,Judee K. Burgoon +4 more
TL;DR: This paper showed that trained coders were reliably making rapid judgments after watching both long and short interaction segments but their judgments were not more accurate than the expert interviewers, which raises more questions about the conditions under which making rapid judgment from verbal and nonverbal cues achieves accurate detection of veracity.