Kai Spohrer
University of Mannheim
37 Papers
47 Citations
Kai Spohrer is an academic researcher from University of Mannheim. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Software development. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 32 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
A Blockchain Research Framework
Marten Risius,Kai Spohrer +1 more
- 01 Jan 2017
TL;DR: An established research framework is adapted to structure the insights of the current body of research on blockchain technology, the present research scope as well as disregarded topics are outlined, and multidisciplinary research approaches are sketched out.
Augmenting Medical Diagnosis Decisions? An Investigation into Physicians’ Decision-Making Process with Artificial Intelligence
TL;DR: The cognitive challenges that medical decision makers face when they receive potentially incorrect advice from AI-based diagnosis systems are uncovers and the crucial role of human actors in compensating for AI errors is spotlights.
211
Coordination Challenges in Large-Scale Software Development: A Case Study of Planning Misalignment in Hybrid Settings
TL;DR: This case study within a large software development unit of 13 teams at a global enterprise software company explores how and why a combination of traditional planning on an inter-team level and agile development on a team level can result in ineffective coordination.
136
Identity Threats as a Reason for Resistance to Artificial Intelligence: Survey Study With Medical Students and Professionals
TL;DR: In this article , the authors investigated how medical professionals' resistance to AI can be understood because of professional identity threats and temporal perceptions of AI systems and concluded that the distinct dimensions of medical professional identity are affected by the upcoming technological change through AI.
•Proceedings Article
Knowledge Creation In Information Systems Development Teams: The Role Of Pair Programming And Peer Code Review
Kai Spohrer,Thomas Kude,Christoph Tobias Schmidt,Armin Heinzl +3 more
- 01 Jan 2013
TL;DR: Findings show that the techniques may be substitutes on a dyadic level, but may complement each other regarding their effects on team-level knowledge creation: if applied simultaneously, they may collectively enable socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization of knowledge.
16