The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is increasingly used as the standard method for detection and characterization of microorganisms and genetic markers in a variety of sample types. However, the method is prone to inhibiting substances, which may be present in the analysed sample and which may affect the sensitivity of the assay or even lead to false-negative results. The PCR inhibitors represent a diverse group of substances with different properties and mechanisms of action. Some of them are predominantly found in specific types of samples thus necessitating matrix-specific protocols for preparation of nucleic acids before PCR. A variety of protocols have been developed to remove the PCR inhibitors. This review focuses on the general properties of PCR inhibitors and their occurrence in specific matrices. Strategies for their removal from the sample and for quality control by assessing their influence on the individual PCR test are presented and discussed.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05384.x

PCR inhibitors - occurrence, properties and removal.

The discovery of Helicobacter pylori in 1982 was the starting point of a revolution concerning the concepts and management of gastroduodenal diseases. It is now well accepted that the most common stomach disease, peptic ulcer disease, is an infectious disease, and all consensus conferences agree that the causative agent, H. pylori, must be treated with antibiotics. Furthermore, the concept emerged that this bacterium could be the trigger of various malignant diseases of the stomach, and it is now a model for chronic bacterial infections causing cancer. Most of the many different techniques involved in diagnosis of H. pylori infection are performed in clinical microbiology laboratories. The aim of this article is to review the current status of these methods and their application, highlighting the important progress which has been made in the past decade. Both invasive and noninvasive techniques will be reviewed.

Helicobacter pylori Detection and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The genus Entamoeba contains many species, six of which (Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, Entamoeba moshkovskii, Entamoeba polecki, Entamoeba coli, and Entamoeba hartmanni) reside in the human intestinal lumen. Entamoeba histolytica is the causative agent of amebiasis and is considered a leading parasitic cause of death worldwide in humans. Although recent studies highlight the recovery of E. dispar and E. moshkovskii from patients with gastrointestinal symptoms, there is still no convincing evidence of a causal link between the presence of these two species and the symptoms of the host. New approaches to the identification of E. histolytica are based on detection of E. histolytica-specific antigen and DNA in stool and other clinical samples. Several molecular diagnostic tests, including conventional and real-time PCR, have been developed for the detection and differentiation of E. histolytica, E. dispar, and E. moshkovskii in clinical samples. The purpose of this review is to discuss different methods that exist for the identification of E. histolytica, E. dispar, and E. moshkovskii which are available to the clinical diagnostic laboratory. To address the need for a specific diagnostic test for amebiasis, a substantial amount of work has been carried out over the last decade in different parts of the world. The molecular diagnostic tests are increasingly being used for both clinical and research purposes. In order to minimize undue treatment of individuals infected with other species of Entamoeba such as E. dispar and E. moshkovskii, efforts have been made for specific diagnosis of E. histolytica infection and not to treat based simply on the microscopic examination of Entamoeba species in the stool. The incorporation of many new technologies into the diagnostic laboratory will lead to a better understanding of the public health problem and measures to control the disease.

/pdf/laboratory-diagnostic-techniques-for-entamoeba-species-2wdhseuvsk.pdf

Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques for Entamoeba Species

The PCR is an extremely powerful method for detecting microorganisms. However, its full potential as a rapid detection method is limited by the inhibition of the thermostable DNA polymerase from Thermus aquaticus by many components found in complex biological samples. In this study, we have compared the effects of known PCR-inhibiting samples on nine thermostable DNA polymerases. Samples of blood, cheese, feces, and meat, as well as various ions, were added to PCR mixtures containing various thermostable DNA polymerases. The nucleic acid amplification capacity of the nine polymerases, under buffer conditions recommended by the manufacturers, was evaluated by using a PCR-based detection method for Listeria monocytogenes in the presence of purified template DNA and different concentrations of PCR inhibitors. The AmpliTaq Gold and the Taq DNA polymerases from Thermus aquaticus were totally inhibited in the presence of 0.004% (vol/vol) blood in the PCR mixture, while the HotTub, Pwo, rTth, and Tfl DNA polymerases were able to amplify DNA in the presence of 20% (vol/vol) blood without reduced amplification sensitivity. The DNA polymerase from Thermotoga maritima (Ultma) was found to be the most susceptible to PCR inhibitors present in cheese, feces, and meat samples. When the inhibitory effect of K and Na ions was tested on the nine polymerases, HotTub from Thermus flavus and rTth from Thermus thermophilus were the most resistant. Thus, the PCR-inhibiting effect of various components in biological samples can, to some extent, be eliminated by the use of the appropriate thermostable DNA polymerase.

Capacity of nine thermostable DNA polymerases To mediate DNA amplification in the presence of PCR-inhibiting samples.

A robust high-throughput multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme for Clostridium difficile was developed and validated using a diverse collection of 50 reference isolates representing 45 different PCR ribotypes and 102 isolates from recent clinical samples. A total of 49 PCR ribotypes were represented overall. All isolates were typed by MLST and yielded 40 sequence types (STs). A web-accessible database was set up (http://pubmlst.org/cdifficile/) to facilitate the dissemination and comparison of C. difficile MLST genotyping data among laboratories. MLST and PCR ribotyping were similar in discriminatory abilities, having indices of discrimination of 0.90 and 0.92, respectively. Some STs corresponded to a single PCR ribotype (32/40), other STs corresponded to multiple PCR ribotypes (8/40), and, conversely, the PCR ribotype was not always predictive of the ST. The total number of variable nucleotide sites in the concatenated MLST sequences was 103/3,501 (2.9%). Concatenated MLST sequences were used to construct a neighbor-joining tree which identified four phylogenetic groups of STs and one outlier (ST-11; PCR ribotype 078). These groups apparently correlate with clades identified previously by comparative genomics. The MLST scheme was sufficiently robust to allow direct genotyping of C. difficile in total stool DNA extracts without isolate culture. The direct (nonculture) MLST approach may prove useful as a rapid genotyping method, potentially benefiting individual patients and informing hospital infection control.

Multilocus Sequence Typing of Clostridium difficile

A model was developed to study inhibitors present in feces which prevent the use of PCR for the detection of Helicobacter pylori. A DNA fragment amplified with the same primers as H. pylori was used to spike samples before extraction by a modified QIAamp tissue method. Inhibitors, separated on an Ultrogel AcA44 column, were characterized. Inhibitors in feces are complex polysaccharides possibly originating from vegetable material in the diet.

Complex polysaccharides as PCR inhibitors in feces: Helicobacter pylori model.

Detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA in human feces by PCR: DNA stability and removal of inhibitors.

PCR is recognized as a promising method for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens. However, detection of PCR products by gel electrophoresis is difficult to implement in routine clinical laboratories. The aim of this study was to compare three new DNA enzyme immunoassays with the standard method in their ability to detect PCR products. The three assays were based on the amplification of a fragment of the ureC gene of H. pylori and a colorimetric hybridization assay. The first assay (GEN-ETI-K DNA enzyme immunoassay; Sorin, Sallugia, Italy) was based on the hybridization of amplified DNA with a probe bound in microtiter wells and detected with labelled anti-DNA antibody. The second assay (Pylori-prob; Biocode, Sclessin, Belgium) comprised a solid-phase sandwich hybridization system with a specific biotinylated probe being used for detection. Finally, the third assay (PCR enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany) was based on the hybridization of amplified DNA labelled with digoxigenin as a probe (used as a coating in microtiter wells) and detected with antidigoxigenin-peroxidase as conjugate. The sensitivity of the colorimetric assay was evaluated by using amplification products from PCR assays performed on several 10-fold dilutions of DNA from H. pylori CIP 101260, and the specificity was assessed with different urease-positive bacteria. Biopsy specimens from 199 patients were tested; 106 were classified as H. pylori positive, and 93 were classified as H. pylori negative by culture and/or histological examination as the "gold standard." The receiving operating characteristic curve was used to determine the best cutoff point for each assay. The detection of PCR products by colorimetric hybridization increases the sensitivity up to 100-fold compared to that with gel electrophoresis. The results are rapid (4 h) and easy to interpret and can be automated.

Evaluation of performances of three DNA enzyme immunoassays for detection of Helicobacter pylori PCR products from biopsy specimens.

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

José Cabrita

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

Complex polysaccharides as PCR inhibitors in feces: Helicobacter pylori model.

Detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA in human feces by PCR: DNA stability and removal of inhibitors.

Evaluation of performances of three DNA enzyme immunoassays for detection of Helicobacter pylori PCR products from biopsy specimens.