Social entrepreneurship (SE), as a field of practice that is widely endorsed and supported by political institutions, has come a long way in ‘mainstreaming from the margins’ in recent decades. Yet SE exists in a state of highly contested discourse, i.e. capable of forging social cohesion as well as shattering existing boundaries between state and society. Difficult and ambiguous to agreeably define, the optimistic rush to (re)invent and promote SE has faded somewhat as politicians, citizens and social entrepreneurs try to suitably reframe SE in a post-Global Financial Crisis (GFC) environment. In the United Kingdom, political support has been maintained because SE offers a way to engage so-called 'third sector' organisations more efficiently with state processes and requirements (Office of the Third Sector, 2009, Aiken and Bode, 2009, Kelly, 2007, Haugh and Kitson, 2007). General publics have been both interested but also sceptical about SE - how is it different to the work done by voluntary and community organizations? What does one 'look' like and what are the benefits at local levels of social action? While we might expect that these questions have been already suitably answered, recent research shows that they have not (Steyaert and Dey, 2010, Curtis, 2008, Haugh, 2012). Instead of theorizing SE as a conceptual whole, I adopt a critical view which tolerates both the contradictory multiplicities in SE identities, and the centrality of fractured power relations in the SE construct and its discourses (Tomlinson and Schwabenland, 2010, Sharp and Richardson, 2001). In doing so, I draw from some key research dealing with SE identity, especially that which centres on articulation of the self and the suppressed-self (Jones et al., 2008, Parkinson and Howorth, 2008). Following this, I develop an account of the contemporary importance of conceptual 'fault-lines' in SE discourse, which bears testament to the diverse histories and cultural legacies that have produced socially enterprising organizations. Building on this, I seek to further problematize SE discourse with reference to the current critical turn in SE research, especially in terms of the type of power relations in discourse. This assists current knowledge by acknowledging the necessary incompleteness of the SE idea and identities, and shows that political discourse overlooks this reality, creating a false consensus that SE offers a 'whole' solution. Indeed, I argue that it is perhaps less than necessary for a full ‘mainstreaming’ of SE when there seems to still be a great deal of value inhabiting the margins where corporations and the state cannot make sustainable impact.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2152728_code1212121.pdf?abstractid=2152728&mirid=1&type=2

It’s Not You: It’s Me! Breaking up Social Entrepreneurship Identity

This essay began as a paper for a day of critical reflection, drawing on three sources - promotional material for 'Social Enterprise Day' in November 2006, the 'Social Enterprise Awards' in the same month, and ministerial statements - to illustrate some observations about a dominant view of social enterprise. The purpose of making this essay public in 2011is not simply to record a worry about the direction of an aspect of social policy in the United Kingdom during the second and third terms of the New Labour government (from 2001 onwards), but also to draw attention to the continuing relevance of the worry.

Social enterprise under New Labour and beyond: many good ideas with the potential to become a disaster

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

Jon Griffith

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

Social enterprise under New Labour and beyond: many good ideas with the potential to become a disaster