INTRODUCTION
The echocardiographic diagnosis criteria for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) are highly specific but sensitivity is low, especially in the early stages of the disease. The role of echocardiographic strain in ARVC has not been fully elucidated, although prior studies suggest that it can improve the detection of subtle functional abnormalities. The purposes of the study were to determine whether these advanced measures of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction on echocardiogram, including RV strain, increase diagnostic value for ARVC disease detection and to evaluate the association of echocardiographic parameters with arrhythmic outcomes.


METHODS
The study included 28 patients from the Heart Institute of São Paulo ARVC cohort with a definite diagnosis of ARVC established according to the 2010 Task Force Criteria. All patients were submitted to ECHO's advanced techniques including RV strain, and the parameters were compared to prior conventional visual ECHO and CMR.


RESULTS
In total, 28 patients were enrolled in order to perform ECHO's advanced techniques. A total of 2/28 (7%) patients died due to a cardiovascular cause, 2/28 (7%) underwent heart transplantation, and 14/28 (50%) patients developed sustained ventricular arrhythmic events. Among ECHO's parameters, RV dilatation, measured by RVDd (p = 0.018) and RVOT PSAX (p = 0.044), was significantly associated with arrhythmic outcomes. RV free wall longitudinal strain < 14.35% in absolute value was associated with arrhythmic outcomes (p = 0.033).


CONCLUSION
Our data suggest that ECHO's advanced techniques improve ARVC detection and that abnormal RV strain can be associated with arrhythmic risk stratification. Further studies are necessary to better demonstrate these findings and contribute to risk stratification in ARVC, in addition to other well-known risk markers.

Enhancing Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Detection and Risk Stratification: Insights from Advanced Echocardiographic Techniques.

Artificial intelligence-enhanced automation for M-mode echocardiographic analysis: ensuring fully automated, reliable, and reproducible measurements.

An echocardiogram is a sophisticated ultrasound imaging technique employed to diagnose heart conditions. The transthoracic echocardiogram, one of the most prevalent types, is instrumental in evaluating significant cardiac diseases. However, interpreting its results heavily relies on the clinician's expertise. In this context, artificial intelligence has emerged as a vital tool for helping clinicians. This study critically analyzes key state-of-the-art research that uses deep learning techniques to automate transthoracic echocardiogram analysis and support clinical judgments. We have systematically organized and categorized articles that proffer solutions for view classification, enhancement of image quality and dataset, segmentation and identification of cardiac structures, detection of cardiac function abnormalities, and quantification of cardiac functions. We compared the performance of various deep learning approaches within each category, identifying the most promising methods. Additionally, we highlight limitations in current research and explore promising avenues for future exploration. These include addressing generalizability issues, incorporating novel AI approaches, and tackling the analysis of rare cardiac diseases. 

Deep learning supported echocardiogram analysis: A comprehensive review

/pdf/editors-choice-to-the-may-2022-issue-2o4kfnp7.pdf

Editor’s choice to the May 2022 issue

Continuous measurement of pressure in the right atrium and pulmonary artery has commonly been used to monitor right ventricular function in critically ill and surgical patients. This approach is largely based upon the assumption that right atrial and pulmonary arterial pressures provide accurate surrogates for diastolic filling and peak right ventricular pressures, respectively. However, due to both technical and physiologic factors, this assumption is not always true. Accordingly, recent studies have begun to emphasize the potential clinical value of also measuring right ventricular pressure at the bedside. This has highlighted both past and emerging research demonstrating the utility of analyzing not only the amplitude of right ventricular pressure but also the shape of the pressure waveform. This brief review summarizes data demonstrating that combining conventional measurements of right ventricular pressure with variables derived from waveform shape allows for more comprehensive and ideally continuous bedside assessment of right ventricular function, particularly when combined with stroke volume measurement or 3D echocardiography, and discusses the potential use of right ventricular pressure analysis in computational models for evaluating cardiac function.

Right Ventricular Pressure Waveform Analysis – Clinical Relevance and Future Directions

We aimed to compare the segmentation performance of the current prominent deep learning (DL) algorithms with ground-truth segmentations and to validate the reproducibility of the manually created 2D echocardiographic four cardiac chamber ground-truth annotation. Recently emerged DL based fully-automated chamber segmentation and function assessment methods have shown great potential for future application in aiding image acquisition, quantification, and suggestion for diagnosis. However, the performance of current DL algorithms have not previously been compared with each other. In addition, the reproducibility of ground-truth annotations which are the basis of these algorithms have not yet been fully validated. We retrospectively enrolled 500 consecutive patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) from December 2019 to December 2020. Simple U-net, Res-U-net, and Dense-U-net algorithms were compared for the segmentation performances and clinical indices such as left atrial volume (LAV), left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV), LV mass, and ejection fraction (EF) were evaluated. The inter- and intra-observer variability analysis was performed by two expert sonographers for a randomly selected echocardiographic view in 100 patients (apical 2-chamber, apical 4-chamber, and parasternal short axis views). The overall performance of all DL methods was excellent [average dice similarity coefficient (DSC) 0.91 to 0.95 and average Intersection over union (IOU) 0.83 to 0.90], with the exception of LV wall area on PSAX view (average DSC of 0.83, IOU 0.72). In addition, there were no significant difference in clinical indices between ground truth and automated DL measurements. For inter- and intra-observer variability analysis, the overall intra observer reproducibility was excellent: LAV (ICC = 0.995), LVEDV (ICC = 0.996), LVESV (ICC = 0.997), LV mass (ICC = 0.991) and EF (ICC = 0.984). The inter-observer reproducibility was slightly lower as compared to intraobserver agreement: LAV (ICC = 0.976), LVEDV (ICC = 0.982), LVESV (ICC = 0.970), LV mass (ICC = 0.971), and EF (ICC = 0.899). The three current prominent DL-based fully automated methods are able to reliably perform four-chamber segmentation and quantification of clinical indices. Furthermore, we were able to validate the four cardiac chamber ground-truth annotation and demonstrate an overall excellent reproducibility, but still with some degree of inter-observer variability. 

/pdf/fully-automated-quantification-of-cardiac-chamber-and-2b25zrye.pdf

Fully automated quantification of cardiac chamber and function assessment in 2-D echocardiography: clinical feasibility of deep learning-based algorithms

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

John J. McDermott

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

Fully automated quantification of cardiac chamber and function assessment in 2-D echocardiography: clinical feasibility of deep learning-based algorithms