Along with the rapid developments in communication technologies and the surge in the use of mobile devices, a brand-new computation paradigm, Edge Computing, is surging in popularity. Meanwhile, Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications are thriving with the breakthroughs in deep learning and the many improvements in hardware architectures. Billions of data bytes, generated at the network edge, put massive demands on data processing and structural optimization. Thus, there exists a strong demand to integrate Edge Computing and AI, which gives birth to Edge Intelligence. In this paper, we divide Edge Intelligence into AI for edge (Intelligence-enabled Edge Computing) and AI on edge (Artificial Intelligence on Edge). The former focuses on providing more optimal solutions to key problems in Edge Computing with the help of popular and effective AI technologies while the latter studies how to carry out the entire process of building AI models, i.e., model training and inference, on the edge. This paper provides insights into this new inter-disciplinary field from a broader perspective. It discusses the core concepts and the research road-map, which should provide the necessary background for potential future research initiatives in Edge Intelligence.

Edge Intelligence: The Confluence of Edge Computing and Artificial Intelligence

Along with the rapid developments in communication technologies and the surge in the use of mobile devices, a brand-new computation paradigm, edge computing, is surging in popularity. Meanwhile, the artificial intelligence (AI) applications are thriving with the breakthroughs in deep learning and the many improvements in hardware architectures. Billions of data bytes, generated at the network edge, put massive demands on data processing and structural optimization. Thus, there exists a strong demand to integrate edge computing and AI, which gives birth to edge intelligence. In this article, we divide edge intelligence into AI for edge (intelligence-enabled edge computing) and AI on edge (artificial intelligence on edge). The former focuses on providing more optimal solutions to key problems in edge computing with the help of popular and effective AI technologies while the latter studies how to carry out the entire process of building AI models, i.e., model training and inference, on the edge. This article provides insights into this new interdisciplinary field from a broader perspective. It discusses the core concepts and the research roadmap, which should provide the necessary background for potential future research initiatives in edge intelligence.

pdf/edge-intelligence-the-confluence-of-edge-computing-and-e4418we89y.pdf

Federated learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning strategy that generates a global model by learning from multiple decentralized edge clients. FL enables on-device training, keeping the client’s local data private, and further, updating the global model based on the local model updates. While FL methods offer several advantages, including scalability and data privacy, they assume there are available computational resources at each edge-device/client. However, the Internet-of-Things (IoT)-enabled devices, e.g., robots, drone swarms, and low-cost computing devices (e.g., Raspberry Pi), may have limited processing ability, low bandwidth and power, or limited storage capacity. In this survey article, we propose to answer this question: how to train distributed machine learning models for resource-constrained IoT devices? To this end, we first explore the existing studies on FL, relative assumptions for distributed implementation using IoT devices, and explore their drawbacks. We then discuss the implementation challenges and issues when applying FL to an IoT environment. We highlight an overview of FL and provide a comprehensive survey of the problem statements and emerging challenges, particularly during applying FL within heterogeneous IoT environments. Finally, we point out the future research directions for scientists and researchers who are interested in working at the intersection of FL and resource-constrained IoT environments. 

A Survey on Federated Learning for Resource-Constrained IoT Devices

/pdf/train-big-then-compress-rethinking-model-size-for-efficient-2kd0lrgwub.pdf

Train Big, Then Compress: Rethinking Model Size for Efficient Training and Inference of Transformers

Executing machine learning workloads locally on resource constrained microcontrollers (MCUs) promises to drastically expand the application space of IoT. However, so-called TinyML presents severe technical challenges, as deep neural network inference demands a large compute and memory budget. To address this challenge, neural architecture search (NAS) promises to help design accurate ML models that meet the tight MCU memory, latency and energy constraints. A key component of NAS algorithms is their latency/energy model, i.e., the mapping from a given neural network architecture to its inference latency/energy on an MCU. In this paper, we observe an intriguing property of NAS search spaces for MCU model design: on average, model latency varies linearly with model operation (op) count under a uniform prior over models in the search space. Exploiting this insight, we employ differentiable NAS (DNAS) to search for models with low memory usage and low op count, where op count is treated as a viable proxy to latency. Experimental results validate our methodology, yielding our MicroNet models, which we deploy on MCUs using Tensorflow Lite Micro, a standard open-source NN inference runtime widely used in the TinyML community. MicroNets demonstrate state-of-the-art results for all three TinyMLperf industry-standard benchmark tasks: visual wake words, audio keyword spotting, and anomaly detection.

pdf/micronets-neural-network-architectures-for-deploying-tinyml-1jycvhv81y.pdf

MicroNets: Neural Network Architectures for Deploying TinyML Applications on Commodity Microcontrollers

Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) can be difficult to deploy on resource constrained devices due to their this http URL a result, there is a need for compression techniques that can significantly compress RNNs without negatively impacting task accuracy. This paper introduces a method to compress RNNs for resource constrained environments using Kronecker product (KP). KPs can compress RNN layers by 15-38x with minimal accuracy loss. By quantizing the resulting models to 8-bits, we further push the compression factor to 50x. We show that KP can beat the task accuracy achieved by other state-of-the-art compression techniques across 5 benchmarks spanning 3 different applications, while simultaneously improving inference run-time. We show that the KP compression mechanism does introduce an accuracy loss, which can be mitigated by a proposed hybrid KP (HKP) approach. Our HKP algorithm provides fine-grained control over the compression ratio, enabling us to regain accuracy lost during compression by adding a small number of model parameters.

pdf/compressing-rnns-for-iot-devices-by-15-38x-using-kronecker-24eqxg0zu1.pdf

Compressing RNNs for IoT devices by 15-38x using Kronecker Products

Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) break a time-series input (or a sentence) into multiple time-steps (or words) and process it one time-step (word) at a time. However, not all of these time-steps (words) need to be processed to determine the final output accurately. Prior work has exploited this intuition by incorporating an additional predictor in front of the RNN model to prune time-steps that are not relevant. However, they jointly train the predictor and the RNN model, allowing one to learn from the mistakes of the other. In this work we present a method to skip RNN time-steps without retraining or fine tuning the original RNN model. Using an ideal predictor, we show that even without retraining the original model, we can train a predictor to skip 45% of steps for the SST dataset and 80% of steps for the IMDB dataset without impacting the model accuracy. We show that the decision to skip is not easy by comparing against 5 different baselines based on solutions derived from domain knowledge. Finally, we present a case study about the cost and accuracy benefits of realizing such a predictor. This realistic predictor on the SST dataset is able to reduce the computation by more than 25% with at most 0.3% loss in accuracy while being 40× smaller than the original RNN model.

Skipping RNN State Updates without Retraining the Original Model

Recurrent neural networks can be large and compute-intensive, yet many applications that benefit from RNNs run on small devices with very limited compute and storage capabilities while still having run-time constraints. As a result, there is a need for compression techniques that can achieve significant compression without negatively impacting inference run-time and task accuracy. This paper explores a new compressed RNN cell implementation called Hybrid Matrix Decomposition (HMD) that achieves this dual objective. This scheme divides the weight matrix into two parts - an unconstrained upper half and a lower half composed of rank-1 blocks. This results in output features where the upper sub-vector has "richer" features while the lower-sub vector has "constrained features". HMD can compress RNNs by a factor of 2-4x while having a faster run-time than pruning (Zhu &Gupta, 2017) and retaining more model accuracy than matrix factorization (Grachev et al., 2017). We evaluate this technique on 5 benchmarks spanning 3 different applications, illustrating its generality in the domain of edge computing.

Run-Time Efficient RNN Compression for Inference on Edge Devices

Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) can be difficult to deploy on resource constrained devices due to their size. As a result, there is a need for compression techniques that can significantly compress RNNs without negatively impacting task accuracy. This paper introduces a method to compress RNNs for resource constrained environments using Kronecker product (KP). KPs can compress RNN layers by 16-38x with minimal accuracy loss. We show that KP can beat the task accuracy achieved by other state-of-the-art compression techniques (pruning and low-rank matrix factorization) across 4 benchmarks spanning 3 different applications, while simultaneously improving inference run-time.

Pushing the limits of RNN Compression

Recurrent neural networks can be large and compute-intensive, yet many applications that benefit from RNNs run on small devices with very limited compute and storage capabilities while still having run-time constraints. As a result, there is a need for compression techniques that can achieve significant compression without negatively impacting inference run-time and task accuracy. This paper explores a new compressed RNN cell implementation called Hybrid Matrix Decomposition (HMD) that achieves this dual objective. HMD creates dense matrices that results in output features where the upper sub-vector has "richer" features while the lower sub vector has "constrained" features". On the benchmarks evaluated in this paper, this results in faster inference runtime than pruning and better accuracy than matrix factorization for compression factors of 2-4x.

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

Jesse Beu

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

Compressing RNNs for IoT devices by 15-38x using Kronecker Products

Skipping RNN State Updates without Retraining the Original Model

Run-Time Efficient RNN Compression for Inference on Edge Devices

Pushing the limits of RNN Compression

Run-Time Efficient RNN Compression for Inference on Edge Devices