Jennifer Dill
Portland State University
141 Papers
862 Citations
Jennifer Dill is an academic researcher from Portland State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Travel behavior & Poison control. The author has an hindex of 35, co-authored 138 publications. Previous affiliations of Jennifer Dill include University of California, Berkeley & Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná.
Chat about Author
Papers
Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review
TL;DR: Most of the evidence examined in this review supports the crucial role of public policy in encouraging bicycling, including infrastructure provision and pro-bicycle programs, supportive land use planning, and restrictions on car use.
1.4K
Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data
TL;DR: The findings suggest that cyclists are sensitive to the effects of distance, turn frequency, slope, intersection control, and traffic volumes, and appear to place relatively high value on off-street bike paths, enhanced neighborhood bikeways with traffic calming features (aka “bicycle boulevards”), and bridge facilities.
706
Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them
Jennifer Dill,Theresa Carr +1 more
TL;DR: For example, this article found that cities with higher levels of bicycle infrastructure (lanes and paths) experienced higher bicycle commuting, and that the presence of a striped lane or separated path can increase a cyclist's perception of safety.
603
Bicycling for Transportation and Health: The Role of Infrastructure
TL;DR: The data support the need for well-connected neighborhood streets and a network of bicycle-specific infrastructure to encourage more bicycling among adults and can be accomplished through comprehensive planning, regulation, and funding.
519
Factors Affecting Bicycling Demand: Initial Survey Findings from the Portland, Oregon, Region
Jennifer Dill,Kim Voros +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the results from a random phone survey of adults in the Portland, Oregon, region were used to explore the relationship between levels of cycling and demographics, objective environmental factors, perceptions of the environment, and attitudes.