Jasmin Werker
Forschungszentrum Jülich
5 Papers
Jasmin Werker is an academic researcher from Forschungszentrum Jülich. The author has contributed to research in topics: Sustainability & Sustainable development. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 5 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
Review of Sustainability Assessment Approaches Based on Life Cycles
TL;DR: In this article, a review is performed on sustainability assessment based on Life Cycle Thinking, which mostly means Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA), and until the end of 2018, 258 publications can be found, from which 146 include a case study.
88
Sustainable Development Goals as a Guideline for Indicator Selection in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment
Christina Wulf,Jasmin Werker,Petra Zapp,Andrea Schreiber,Holger Schlör,Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs +5 more
TL;DR: In this article, a case study of electrolytic hydrogen production is used to compare between the goal-based and indicator-based assessment, and the results show meaningful differences between them.
76
Working conditions in hydrogen production: A social life cycle assessment
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed the social impact of hydrogen production by advanced alkaline water electrolysis (AEL) from a life cycle perspective and found that the AEL had the least social impact along the German process chain, followed by the Spanish and the Austrian.
46
Social LCA for rare earth NdFeB permanent magnets
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored whether there is a difference in social risks for rare earth permanent magnet production from three different rare earth ore production locations and the associated value chains and the Product Social Impact Life Cycle Assessment (PSILCA) 2.0 database is used to assess the social implications.
23
Community compensation in the context of Carbon Capture and Storage: Current debates and practices
Christine Boomsma,Emma ter Mors,C. Jack,K.P.F. Broecks,Corina Buzoianu,Diana Cismaru,Ruben Peuchen,Pim Piek,Diana Schumann,Simon Shackley,Jasmin Werker +10 more
TL;DR: A review of the community compensation literature in the form of four debates is provided in this paper, drawing together environmental social science research on different low carbon technologies (e.g. CCS, renewable energy).
17