Janalt Damstra
University Medical Center Groningen
19 Papers
97 Citations
Janalt Damstra is an academic researcher from University Medical Center Groningen. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cone beam computed tomography & Voxel. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 19 publications. Previous affiliations of Janalt Damstra include University of Groningen.
Chat about Author
Papers
Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems
TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated the accuracy and reliability of standard anthropometric linear measurements made with three different three-dimensional scanning systems namely laser surface scanning (Minolta Vivid 900), cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), 3D stereo-photogrammetry (Di3D system) and compared them to physical linear measurements.
207
Accuracy and reliability of facial soft tissue depth measurements using cone beam computer tomography
TL;DR: There was no clinical significant difference between the measurements made on the CBCT images and the physical measurements and increasing the voxel size from 0.4 to 0.3mm resulted in a slight increase of accuracy.
131
A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry
TL;DR: Care has to be taken using cephalometric midsagittal planes for diagnosis and treatment planning of craniofacial asymmetry as they might differ from the true plane of symmetry as determined by morphometrics.
Evaluation and comparison of postero-anterior cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography images for the detection of mandibular asymmetry.
TL;DR: Postero-anterior cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images are very reliable and accurate for the detection of asymmetry and should be considered over conventional PA cephalometry when a chin deviation is present.
61
Reliability and the smallest detectable difference of measurements on 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images
TL;DR: The measurement errors of 3D cephalometric measurements (except for the ANB angle) can be considered clinically relevant and questions the use of linear and angular 3D measurements to detect true treatment effects when a high level of accuracy is required.
48