Jakob de Haan
University of Groningen
459 Papers
2.9K Citations
Jakob de Haan is an academic researcher from University of Groningen. The author has contributed to research in topics: Monetary policy & Interest rate. The author has an hindex of 67, co-authored 416 publications. Previous affiliations of Jakob de Haan include ETH Zurich & Center for Economic Studies.
Chat about Author
Papers
•Posted Content
Central Bank Communication and Monetary Policy: A Survey of Theory and Evidence
Alan S. Blinder,Alan S. Blinder,Michael Ehrmann,Michael Ehrmann,Marcel Fratzscher,Marcel Fratzscher,Jakob de Haan,Jakob de Haan,Jakob de Haan,David-Jan Jansen,David-Jan Jansen +10 more
TL;DR: The authors survey the literature on central bank communication and find that communication can be an important and powerful part of the central bank's toolkit since it has the ability to move financial markets, to enhance the predictability of monetary policy decisions, and potentially to help achieve central banks' macroeconomic objectives.
154
Taylor rules for the ECB using expectations data
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors estimate Taylor rules for the euro area using Consensus Economics data for expected inflation and output growth, and compare these estimates with more conventional specifications in which actual outcomes are used.
151
Look who's talking: ECB communication during the first years of EMU
David-Jan Jansen,Jakob de Haan +1 more
TL;DR: The authors studied the communication by European central bankers during the first years of the European Economic and Monetary Union and found that comments by central bankers on interest rates, inflation and economic growth in the Eurozone have often been contradictory.
145
Bank Regulation, the Quality of Institutions, and Banking Risk in Emerging and Developing Countries : An Empirical Analysis
Jeroen Klomp,Jakob de Haan +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the effect of bank regulation and supervision on banking risk, and found that stricter regulations and supervision reduce bank riskiness, but only when there is a high level of institutional quality.
139